Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HLLY vs THRM vs MPAA vs DORM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
HLLY vs THRM vs MPAA vs DORM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $302M | $944M | $220M | $3.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $608M | $1.53B | $771M | $2.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $23M | $2M | $190M |
| Gross Margin | 42.7% | 23.6% | 19.2% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 4.7% | 6.1% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 11.6x | 15.3x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $523M | $295M | $201M | $633M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $161M | $9M | $49M |
HLLY vs THRM vs MPAA vs DORM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holley Inc. (HLLY) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 54.2 | -45.8% |
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 57.0 | -43.0% |
| Dorman Products, In… (DORM) | 100 | 134.8 | +34.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HLLY vs THRM vs MPAA vs DORM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HLLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 15.0x)
- +42.4% vs DORM's +0.5%
THRM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MPAA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DORM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.85
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 8.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 129.7% 10Y total return vs THRM's -14.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 42.9%, current ratio 3.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs HLLY's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.8% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs HLLY's 1.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.4% vs DORM's +0.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs MPAA's 0.2%, ROIC 13.9% vs 6.2% |
HLLY vs THRM vs MPAA vs DORM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HLLY vs THRM vs MPAA vs DORM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DORM leads in 3 of 6 categories
HLLY leads 0 • THRM leads 0 • MPAA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HLLY and THRM and DORM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DORM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 3.5x HLLY's $608M. DORM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPAA's 0.3%. On growth, THRM holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $608M | $1.5B | $771M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $82M | $127M | $49M | $377M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $23M | $2M | $190M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $79M | $30M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.7% | +23.6% | +19.2% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +4.7% | +6.1% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +1.5% | +0.3% | +8.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +5.1% | +3.9% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +11.3% | -9.9% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +154.2% | — | -18.2% | -23.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HLLY and MPAA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, HLLY trades at a 69% valuation discount to THRM's 51.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HLLY's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DORM's 10.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $302M | $944M | $220M | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $787M | $1.1B | $412M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.75x | 51.35x | -11.59x | 18.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.41x | 11.57x | 15.29x | 15.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.10x | 8.21x | 8.19x | 10.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.63x | 0.29x | 1.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 1.32x | 0.88x | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.07x | 15.45x | 5.39x | 49.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DORM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DORM delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for MPAA. THRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HLLY's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPAA scores 7/9 vs THRM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +3.2% | +0.8% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.6% | +0.2% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +7.3% | +6.2% | +13.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +8.2% | +6.6% | +18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.16x | 0.41x | 0.78x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $485M | $134M | $192M | $584M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $161M | $9M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $523M | $295M | $201M | $633M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.30x | 5.83x | 0.94x | 8.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DORM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DORM five years ago would be worth $11,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,517 for HLLY. Over the past 12 months, HLLY leads with a +42.4% total return vs DORM's +0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 34.5% vs THRM's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.1% | -16.3% | -7.2% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.4% | +19.1% | +24.3% | +0.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | -48.0% | +143.5% | +41.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.8% | -58.0% | -51.7% | +19.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.2% | -14.9% | -62.7% | +129.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | -19.6% | +34.5% | +12.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — THRM and DORM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DORM is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HLLY's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THRM currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs HLLY's 56.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 1.43x | 0.99x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.48 | $39.48 | $18.12 | $166.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $25.47 | $9.09 | $98.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.3% | +78.0% | +63.3% | +74.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 59.7 | 58.0 | 71.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 822K | 239K | 87K | 273K |
Analyst Outlook
DORM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HLLY as "Buy", THRM as "Buy", MPAA as "Buy", DORM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 148.0% upside for HLLY (target: $6) vs 12.4% for DORM (target: $140).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.25 | $36.67 | $20.00 | $140.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 15 | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +2.2% | +1.1% |
DORM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
HLLY vs THRM vs MPAA vs DORM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for Holley Inc. (HLLY). Holley Inc. (HLLY) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Holley Inc. (HLLY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM?
On trailing P/E, Holley Inc.
(HLLY) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Gentherm Incorporated at 51. 4x. On forward P/E, Holley Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM?
Over the past 5 years, Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) delivered a total return of +19. 2%, compared to -74. 8% for Holley Inc. (HLLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DORM returned +129. 7% versus HLLY's -74. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Holley Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning HLLY is approximately 128% more volatile than DORM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 116% for Holley Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus 1. 9% for Holley Inc. (HLLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Holley Inc. grew EPS 180. 0% year-over-year, compared to -70. 9% for Gentherm Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, THRM leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM?
Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DORM leads at 16. 8% versus 5. 2% for THRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLLY leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Holley Inc.
(HLLY) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLLY: 148. 0% to $6. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HLLY or THRM or MPAA or DORM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dorman Products, Inc.
(DORM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), +129. 7% 10Y return). Holley Inc. (HLLY) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DORM: +129. 7%, HLLY: -74. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HLLY and THRM and MPAA and DORM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HLLY is a small-cap deep-value stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DORM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.