HLNE vs BN vs BX vs KKR

For growth investors, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the stronger pick with 28.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the cheapest at 16.

4x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Hamilton Lane Incorporated is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hamilton Lane Incorporated wins at 0. 72x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +89.

3%, compared to +7. 1% for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus BN's +308. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

25β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 36% more volatile than HLNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 159% for Brookfield Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is pulling ahead at 28.

7% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hamilton Lane Incorporated grew EPS 46. 6% year-over-year, compared to -99. 8% for Brookfield Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the more profitable company, earning 30.

5% net margin versus 1. 7% for Brookfield Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Blackstone Inc. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLNE: 92. 8% to $171. 50.

In this comparison, BX (6.

3% yield), HLNE (2. 8% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

25), 2. 8% yield, +464. 7% 10Y return). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLNE: +464. 7%, BN: +308. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HLNE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HLNE, BX, KKR pay a dividend while BN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.