Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HMN vs BLK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HMN
Horace Mann Educators Corporation

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.85B
5Y Perf.+25.2%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$166.54B
5Y Perf.+103.1%

HMN vs BLK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HMN logoHMN
BLK logoBLK
IndustryInsurance - Property & CasualtyAsset Management
Market Cap$1.85B$166.54B
Revenue (TTM)$1.64B$20.41B
Net Income (TTM)$162M$6.10B
Gross Margin51.9%49.4%
Operating Margin29.5%37.1%
Forward P/E10.3x20.2x
Total Debt$593M$14.22B
Cash & Equiv.$26M$12.76B

HMN vs BLKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HMN
BLK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Horace Mann Educato… (HMN)100125.2+25.2%
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK)100203.1+103.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HMN vs BLK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BLK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Horace Mann Educators Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HMN
Horace Mann Educators Corporation
The Insurance Pick

HMN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 3.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.26, Low D/E 40.0%
  • Beta 0.26, yield 3.0%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BLK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 15.1%
  • 246.4% 10Y total return vs HMN's 76.0%
  • PEG 2.49 vs HMN's 3.00
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBLK logoBLK14.3% NII/revenue growth vs HMN's 9.7%
ValueHMN logoHMNLower P/E (10.3x vs 20.2x)
Quality / MarginsBLK logoBLK31.2% margin vs HMN's 9.9%
Stability / SafetyHMN logoHMNBeta 0.26 vs BLK's 1.28
DividendsHMN logoHMN3.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs BLK's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)BLK logoBLK+19.7% vs HMN's +13.3%
Efficiency (ROA)BLK logoBLK3.7% ROA vs HMN's 1.1%, ROIC 9.9% vs 51.1%

HMN vs BLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HMNHorace Mann Educators Corporation
FY 2025
Property And Casualty
83.5%$803M
Life And Retirement
16.5%$159M
BLKBlackRock, Inc.
FY 2024
Investment Advice
78.9%$16.1B
Technology Service
7.9%$1.6B
Distribution and Shareholder Service
6.2%$1.3B
Investment Performance
5.9%$1.2B
Service, Other
1.1%$224M

HMN vs BLK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHMNLAGGINGBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HMN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

BLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.4B annually — 12.4x HMN's $1.6B. BLK is the more profitable business, keeping 31.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HMN's 9.9%.

MetricHMN logoHMNHorace Mann Educa…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.6B$20.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$505M$8.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$162M$6.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$553M$3.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.9%+49.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+29.5%+37.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.9%+31.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+33.7%+23.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.4%-22.7%
HMN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HMN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.7x trailing earnings, HMN trades at a 54% valuation discount to BLK's 25.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HMN offers better value at 3.00x vs BLK's 3.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHMN logoHMNHorace Mann Educa…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$166.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.4B$168.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.72x25.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.28x20.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.00x3.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.84x20.73x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.09x8.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.28x3.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.84x35.43x
HMN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HMN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HMN delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for BLK. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HMN's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLK scores 6/9 vs HMN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHMN logoHMNHorace Mann Educa…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.5%+9.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+51.1%+9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+5.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.40x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$567M$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$26M$12.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$593M$14.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.00x9.27x
HMN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BLK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BLK five years ago would be worth $13,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,979 for HMN. Over the past 12 months, BLK leads with a +19.7% total return vs HMN's +13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLK at 20.9% vs HMN's 14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHMN logoHMNHorace Mann Educa…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.0%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+13.3%+19.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.2%+76.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+29.8%+35.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76.0%+246.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.8%+20.9%
BLK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HMN is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HMN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHMN logoHMNHorace Mann Educa…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.26x1.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.33$1219.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$40.04$906.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.6%+88.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.055.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded218K798K
HMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates HMN as "Hold" and BLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for BLK (target: $1312) vs -8.9% for HMN (target: $42). For income investors, HMN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs BLK's 1.91%.

MetricHMN logoHMNHorace Mann Educa…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.67$1311.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts933
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.0%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.37$20.46
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+1.2%
HMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HMN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BLK leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallHorace Mann Educators Corpo… (HMN)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HMN vs BLK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HMN or BLK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN). Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HMN or BLK?

On trailing P/E, Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) is the cheapest at 11.

7x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, Horace Mann Educators Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HMN or BLK?

Over the past 5 years, BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) delivered a total return of +35. 2%, compared to +29. 8% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +246. 4% versus HMN's +76. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HMN or BLK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

26β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning BLK is approximately 396% more volatile than HMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 40% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HMN or BLK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 9. 7% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horace Mann Educators Corporation grew EPS 57. 3% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HMN or BLK?

BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 2% net margin versus 9. 5% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HMN leads at 77. 1% versus 37. 1% for BLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HMN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HMN or BLK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) trades at 10.

3x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for BlackRock, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 22. 2% to $1311. 78.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HMN or BLK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 9% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK).

09

Is HMN or BLK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

26), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HMN: +76. 0%, BLK: +246. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HMN and BLK?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HMN is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HMN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HMN and BLK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HMN: 10.6% · BLK: 14.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(HMN: 9.9% · BLK: 31.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HMN: 11.7x · BLK: 25.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.