Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HMN vs BLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
HMN vs BLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.85B | $166.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.64B | $20.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $162M | $6.10B |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 49.4% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 37.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $593M | $14.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $12.76B |
HMN vs BLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horace Mann Educato… (HMN) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 203.1 | +103.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HMN vs BLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HMN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.26, Low D/E 40.0%
- Beta 0.26, yield 3.0%
BLK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 15.1%
- 246.4% 10Y total return vs HMN's 76.0%
- PEG 2.49 vs HMN's 3.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% NII/revenue growth vs HMN's 9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.2% margin vs HMN's 9.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs BLK's 1.28 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs BLK's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.7% vs HMN's +13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs HMN's 1.1%, ROIC 9.9% vs 51.1% |
HMN vs BLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HMN vs BLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HMN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.4B annually — 12.4x HMN's $1.6B. BLK is the more profitable business, keeping 31.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HMN's 9.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $20.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $505M | $8.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $162M | $6.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $553M | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | +49.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +37.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +31.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +23.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HMN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, HMN trades at a 54% valuation discount to BLK's 25.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HMN offers better value at 3.00x vs BLK's 3.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $166.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $168.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.72x | 25.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.28x | 20.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.00x | 3.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.84x | 20.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 8.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.84x | 35.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HMN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HMN delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for BLK. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HMN's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLK scores 6/9 vs HMN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +51.1% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $567M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $12.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $593M | $14.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.00x | 9.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLK five years ago would be worth $13,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,979 for HMN. Over the past 12 months, BLK leads with a +19.7% total return vs HMN's +13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLK at 20.9% vs HMN's 14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.3% | +19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.2% | +76.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.8% | +35.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.0% | +246.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.8% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HMN is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HMN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.33 | $1219.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.04 | $906.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 218K | 798K |
Analyst Outlook
HMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HMN as "Hold" and BLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for BLK (target: $1312) vs -8.9% for HMN (target: $42). For income investors, HMN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs BLK's 1.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.67 | $1311.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | $20.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +1.2% |
HMN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BLK leads in 1 (Total Returns).
HMN vs BLK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HMN or BLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN). Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HMN or BLK?
On trailing P/E, Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, Horace Mann Educators Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HMN or BLK?
Over the past 5 years, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) delivered a total return of +35. 2%, compared to +29. 8% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +246. 4% versus HMN's +76. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HMN or BLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
26β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning BLK is approximately 396% more volatile than HMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 40% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HMN or BLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 9. 7% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horace Mann Educators Corporation grew EPS 57. 3% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HMN or BLK?
BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 2% net margin versus 9. 5% for Horace Mann Educators Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HMN leads at 77. 1% versus 37. 1% for BLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HMN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HMN or BLK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) trades at 10.
3x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for BlackRock, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 22. 2% to $1311. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — HMN or BLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 9% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK).
09Is HMN or BLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
26), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HMN: +76. 0%, BLK: +246. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HMN and BLK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HMN is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.