Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HNVR vs FXNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
HNVR vs FXNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $167M | $253M | $206M | $176M | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $143M | $112M | $90M | $136M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $18M | $14M | $16M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 74.0% | 54.7% | 54.4% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 19.6% | 7.0% | 14.0% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 11.9x | 11.8x | 10.4x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $136M | $43M | $52M | $70M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $209M | $161M | $119M | $25M | $599M |
HNVR vs FXNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hanover Bancorp, In… (HNVR) | 100 | 113.5 | +13.5% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 158.9 | +58.9% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNVR vs FXNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNVR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FXNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 161.7%
- NIM 3.6% vs HNVR's 2.5%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45 vs FXNC's 0.68
Among these 5 stocks, MNSB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.28 vs FXNC's 7.95
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.28 vs 2.32
- 22.9% margin vs HNVR's 5.2%
- 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.28 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs HNVR's 5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs FXNC's 0.68 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs FIS's -42.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HNVR's 0.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.2% |
HNVR vs FXNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HNVR vs FXNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories
FXNC leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • HNVR leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNVR's 5.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $143M | $112M | $90M | $136M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $25M | $9M | $23M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $18M | $14M | $16M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $21M | $11M | $13M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +74.0% | +54.7% | +54.4% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +19.6% | +7.0% | +14.0% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +15.8% | +16.0% | +11.5% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +18.7% | +11.5% | +7.8% | +23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.2% | +7.1% | +63.0% | +120.9% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 77% valuation discount to FIS's 58.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FIS offers better value at 2.38x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $167M | $253M | $206M | $176M | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | $134M | $139M | $221M | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.27x | 14.27x | 14.66x | 13.35x | 58.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.70x | 11.87x | 11.76x | 10.44x | 6.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.55x | 2.89x | — | 2.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.45x | 6.13x | 15.63x | 11.57x | 7.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 2.25x | 2.29x | 1.30x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 1.35x | 1.11x | 0.82x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.79x | 12.03x | 19.85x | 16.56x | 8.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $4 for HNVR. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HNVR's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +10.0% | +7.8% | +7.3% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +7.7% | +2.0% | +5.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +9.9% | +0.6% | +0.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.32x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$83M | -$118M | -$67M | $45M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $209M | $161M | $119M | $25M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $136M | $43M | $52M | $70M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.14x | 0.84x | 0.16x | 0.31x | 15.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,303 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,487 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +46.0% total return vs FIS's -42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 38.4% vs FIS's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +14.6% | +24.0% | +19.3% | -33.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.4% | +45.5% | +46.0% | +26.6% | -42.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.9% | +110.8% | +165.0% | +21.4% | -13.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.9% | +69.2% | +73.0% | +20.9% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.9% | +241.1% | +161.7% | +126.8% | -18.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.8% | +28.2% | +38.4% | +6.7% | -4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HNVR and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FXNC's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HNVR currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.68x | 0.45x | 0.64x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.49 | $29.85 | $22.62 | $25.17 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.91 | $18.31 | $12.83 | $17.86 | $43.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +93.7% | +94.6% | +93.4% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 52.1 | 64.4 | 52.1 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 80K | 40K | 53K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FXNC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HNVR as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs HNVR's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $21.00 | — | — | $67.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +2.2% | +1.7% | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.61 | $0.37 | — | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.1% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +6.3% |
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FXNC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HNVR vs FXNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus First National Corporation's 7. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 0%, compared to -65. 1% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus FIS's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus First National Corporation's 0. 68β — meaning FXNC is approximately 50% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 68% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FXNC leads at 19. 6% versus 6. 9% for HNVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus First National Corporation's 7. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for First National Corporation — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 54. 3% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
8% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield), HNVR (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HNVR or FXNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 7% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, MNSB: +126. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNVR and FXNC and CZWI and MNSB and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HNVR (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HNVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. HNVR, FXNC, CZWI, FIS pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.