Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HNVR vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
HNVR vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $167M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $143M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $136M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $209M | $25M |
HNVR vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hanover Bancorp, In… (HNVR) | 100 | 113.4 | +13.4% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNVR vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.14x
- Beta 0.63, yield 1.7%, current ratio 0.14x
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.4%, EPS growth 210.0%
- 126.9% 10Y total return vs HNVR's 17.8%
- NIM 3.1% vs HNVR's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.4% NII/revenue growth vs HNVR's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MNSB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs MNSB's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.4% vs HNVR's +4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MNSB's 0.4% |
HNVR vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HNVR vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNVR and MNSB operate at a comparable scale, with $143M and $136M in trailing revenue. MNSB is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNVR's 5.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $143M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.2% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HNVR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 43% valuation discount to HNVR's 23.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HNVR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $167M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.26x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.34x | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.44x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.78x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNSB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNSB delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $4 for HNVR. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HNVR's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNVR scores 6/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$83M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $209M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $136M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.14x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNSB five years ago would be worth $12,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,782 for HNVR. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +26.4% total return vs HNVR's +4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HNVR at 10.8% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.7% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.9% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.8% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.8% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.8% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HNVR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.49 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.91 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HNVR as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". HNVR is the only dividend payer here at 1.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% |
MNSB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HNVR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
HNVR vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNVR or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the stronger pick with -1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNVR or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Hanover Bancorp, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Hanover Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNVR or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to +17. 8% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 9% versus HNVR's +17. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNVR or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hanover Bancorp, Inc.
(HNVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning MNSB is approximately 5% more volatile than HNVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 68% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNVR or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is pulling ahead at -1. 4% versus -3. 4% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -39. 8% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNVR or MNSB?
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 5. 2% for Hanover Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSB leads at 14. 0% versus 6. 9% for HNVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNSB leads at 54. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNVR or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hanover Bancorp, Inc.
(HNVR) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNVR or MNSB?
In this comparison, HNVR (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HNVR or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hanover Bancorp, Inc.
(HNVR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNVR: +17. 8%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNVR and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HNVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. HNVR pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.