Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOUR vs LESL vs FLXS vs PRCH vs IBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Software - Application
Residential Construction
HOUR vs LESL vs FLXS vs PRCH vs IBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Home Improvement | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Software - Application | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $84M | $15M | $299M | $1.20B | $5.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $141M | $1.21B | $458M | $483M | $2.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $835K | $-275M | $22M | $-9M | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 34.5% | 23.2% | 72.4% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | -0.2% | 6.1% | 10.3% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 128.3x | — | 11.8x | — | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $726K | $1.01B | $59M | $393M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $64M | $40M | $53M | $322M |
HOUR vs LESL vs FLXS vs PRCH vs IBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
| Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) | 100 | 104.0 | +4.0% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 198.6 | +98.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOUR vs LESL vs FLXS vs PRCH vs IBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 14.1%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 1.29 vs LESL's 2.31
- +79.1% vs LESL's -88.5%
Among these 5 stocks, LESL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLXS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.9x)
PRCH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 90.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.5%
- 10.2% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6%
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.5%
- 6.6% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 53.0%
- Beta 1.31, yield 1.5%, current ratio 3.03x
- 8.6% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs LESL's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.1% vs LESL's -88.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 20.7% vs 1.6% |
HOUR vs LESL vs FLXS vs PRCH vs IBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOUR vs LESL vs FLXS vs PRCH vs IBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBP leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLXS leads 1 • HOUR leads 0 • LESL leads 0 • PRCH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PRCH and IBP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 20.9x HOUR's $141M. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, PRCH holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $141M | $1.2B | $458M | $483M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $6M | $31M | $72M | $656M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $834,945 | -$275M | $22M | -$9M | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $8M | $28M | $72M | $63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +34.5% | +23.2% | +72.4% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | -0.2% | +6.1% | +10.3% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | -22.7% | +4.8% | -1.8% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +0.6% | +6.1% | +15.0% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | -16.0% | +9.8% | +15.6% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | -85.8% | -27.2% | -157.1% | -21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 88% valuation discount to HOUR's 128.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOUR's 97.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $15M | $299M | $1.2B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $963M | $318M | $1.5B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 128.34x | -0.06x | 15.73x | -338.58x | 22.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.79x | — | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 97.67x | 20.29x | 10.50x | 26.93x | 13.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 0.01x | 0.68x | 2.49x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.34x | — | 1.89x | 50.81x | 8.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 304.58x | — | 8.85x | 23.05x | 19.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-61 for PRCH. HOUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRCH's 17.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LESL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | — | +12.2% | -60.9% | +37.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -42.4% | +7.5% | -1.1% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +1.6% | +9.9% | +9.9% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +6.5% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | — | 0.35x | 17.55x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $948M | $19M | $340M | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $64M | $40M | $53M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $725,507 | $1.0B | $59M | $393M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.47x | -3.06x | 380.21x | 1.35x | 9.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PRCH and IBP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,172 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, HOUR leads with a +79.1% total return vs LESL's -88.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRCH at 131.3% vs LESL's -80.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.7% | -6.9% | +40.4% | +19.0% | -16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.1% | -88.5% | +77.1% | +0.8% | +37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | -99.3% | +246.5% | +1138.1% | +101.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | -99.7% | +29.5% | -12.9% | +81.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | -99.6% | +53.0% | +10.8% | +660.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | -80.6% | +51.3% | +131.3% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOUR and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOUR is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 8.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 2.31x | 1.45x | 2.06x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.84 | $18.56 | $59.95 | $19.44 | $349.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $0.87 | $29.38 | $6.36 | $150.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.1% | +8.7% | +93.1% | +56.4% | +63.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 44.0 | 60.7 | 75.9 | 28.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 134K | 47K | 1.6M | 345K |
Analyst Outlook
IBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRCH as "Buy", IBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.2% upside for IBP (target: $251) vs -14.9% for PRCH (target: $9). For income investors, IBP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.47% vs FLXS's 1.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $54.00 | $9.33 | $251.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 13 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.63 | — | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
IBP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). FLXS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HOUR vs LESL vs FLXS vs PRCH vs IBP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Porch Group, Inc.
(PRCH) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Hour Loop, Inc. at 128. 3x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +81. 7%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +660. 5% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hour Loop, Inc.
(HOUR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 31β — meaning LESL is approximately 78% more volatile than HOUR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 18% for Porch Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Porch Group, Inc.
(PRCH) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hour Loop, Inc. grew EPS 127. 0% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HOUR leads at 30. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP?
Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 0. 5% for HOUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRCH leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Installed Building Products, Inc. — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBP: 14. 2% to $251. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP?
In this comparison, IBP (1.
5% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HOUR, LESL, PRCH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOUR or LESL or FLXS or PRCH or IBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +660. 5% 10Y return). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +660. 5%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOUR and LESL and FLXS and PRCH and IBP?
These companies operate in different sectors (HOUR (Consumer Cyclical) and LESL (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and PRCH (Technology) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HOUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FLXS, IBP pay a dividend while HOUR, LESL, PRCH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.