Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOVR vs GE vs TDG vs BA vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
HOVR vs GE vs TDG vs BA vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $105M | $310.47B | $68.62B | $187.11B | $237.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $48.35B | $9.11B | $92.18B | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $8.66B | $1.97B | $2.27B | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.8% | 59.0% | 4.8% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.5% | 46.5% | -5.9% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 39.3x | 30.6x | 95.7x | 25.4x |
| Total Debt | $30K | $20.49B | $30.03B | $54.43B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $12.39B | $2.81B | $10.92B | $7.43B |
HOVR vs GE vs TDG vs BA vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Horizon Aircraf… (HOVR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 376.5 | +276.5% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 114.8 | +14.8% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 176.3 | +76.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOVR vs GE vs TDG vs BA vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOVR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (19.2x vs 95.7x)
- +377.0% vs TDG's -5.8%
Among these 5 stocks, GE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs GE's 117.1%
- PEG 0.98 vs GE's 3.33
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.6%, current ratio 3.21x
- 21.6% margin vs HOVR's 1.4%
BA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
- 34.5% revenue growth vs HOVR's -414.1%
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.50 vs HOVR's 3.06
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs HOVR's -414.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 95.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs HOVR's 1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs HOVR's 3.06 | |
| Dividends | 13.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs RTX's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +377.0% vs TDG's -5.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs HOVR's -121.4% |
HOVR vs GE vs TDG vs BA vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HOVR vs GE vs TDG vs BA vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories
RTX leads 1 • HOVR leads 1 • GE leads 1 • BA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA and HOVR operate at a comparable scale, with $92.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BA's 2.5%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $48.4B | $9.1B | $92.2B | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $9.9B | $4.6B | -$3.4B | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $8.7B | $2.0B | $2.3B | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $7.5B | $1.9B | -$1.0B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +34.8% | +59.0% | +4.8% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +18.5% | +46.5% | -5.9% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +17.9% | +21.6% | +2.5% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.4% | +20.6% | -1.1% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +24.7% | +13.9% | +14.0% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -1.1% | -13.1% | +31.3% | +32.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RTX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.2x trailing earnings, HOVR trades at a 80% valuation discount to BA's 95.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TDG offers better value at 1.22x vs GE's 3.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $310.5B | $68.6B | $187.1B | $237.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $318.6B | $95.8B | $230.6B | $269.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.21x | 36.42x | 37.88x | 95.71x | 35.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.27x | 30.56x | — | 25.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.08x | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 31.89x | 21.15x | — | 20.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.77x | 7.77x | 2.09x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 38.78x | 16.78x | — | 33.16x | 3.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 42.74x | 37.79x | — | 29.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOVR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOVR. HOVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs HOVR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +45.8% | — | +2.9% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -121.4% | +6.8% | +8.6% | +1.4% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +24.7% | +20.9% | -9.5% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +9.6% | +20.8% | -9.1% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.08x | — | 9.97x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $8.1B | $27.2B | $43.5B | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $12.4B | $2.8B | $10.9B | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30,000 | $20.5B | $30.0B | $54.4B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.69x | 2.55x | 1.89x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $45,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,341 for HOVR. Over the past 12 months, HOVR leads with a +377.0% total return vs TDG's -5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 55.1% vs HOVR's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.6% | -7.2% | -10.6% | +4.2% | -5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +377.0% | +39.3% | -5.8% | +23.8% | +39.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +273.2% | +83.2% | +20.3% | +92.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +352.5% | +138.4% | +1.9% | +121.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +117.1% | +583.3% | +99.4% | +233.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.5% | +55.1% | +22.4% | +6.4% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BA and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOVR's 3.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs HOVR's 57.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.06x | 1.19x | 0.79x | 0.99x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.18 | $348.48 | $1623.83 | $254.35 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $210.51 | $1123.61 | $176.77 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +85.3% | +74.8% | +93.3% | +82.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 54.5 | 57.8 | 57.8 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 5.7M | 368K | 6.6M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TDG and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOVR as "Buy", GE as "Buy", TDG as "Buy", BA as "Buy", RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.0% upside for GE (target: $386) vs 12.6% for BA (target: $267). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.62% vs BA's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $386.20 | $1568.30 | $267.36 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 34 | 39 | 54 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | +13.6% | +0.2% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.36 | $165.45 | $0.43 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). RTX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HOVR vs GE vs TDG vs BA vs RTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX?
On trailing P/E, New Horizon Aircraft Ltd.
(HOVR) is the cheapest at 19. 2x versus The Boeing Company at 95. 7x. On forward P/E, RTX Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TransDigm Group Incorporated wins at 0. 98x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +352.
5%, compared to -76. 6% for New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDG returned +583. 3% versus HOVR's -76. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. 's 3. 06β — meaning HOVR is approximately 512% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to 25. 2% for TransDigm Group Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDG leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus 0. 0% for New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -6. 1% for BA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RTX Corporation (RTX) trades at 25. 4x forward P/E versus 39. 3x for GE Aerospace — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 30. 0% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
6% yield), RTX (1. 5% yield), GE (0. 5% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HOVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOVR or GE or TDG or BA or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 1. 5% yield, +233. 5% 10Y return). New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) carries a higher beta of 3. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +233. 5%, HOVR: -76. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOVR and GE and TDG and BA and RTX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. TDG, RTX pay a dividend while HOVR, GE, BA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.