Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Computer Hardware | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $97M | $1.02B | $4.67B | $9.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $26M | $300K | $78M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $-59M | $-618M | $-957M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -234.6% | -2431.0% | -10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 17.7x | 94.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $30K | $18M | $42M | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $168M | $1.02B | $241M |
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Horizon Aircraf… (HOVR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Red Cat Holdings, I… (RCAT) | 100 | 1171.8 | +1071.8% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 327.3 | +227.3% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 251.0 | +151.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 1.4% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
- +352.2% vs ACHR's -26.6%
RCAT is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -28.8% ROA vs HOVR's -121.4%
ACHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JOBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 2.70
- Rev growth 391.8%, EPS growth -29.9%
- -4.8% 10Y total return vs ACHR's -37.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs HOVR's -414.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.70 vs RCAT's 3.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +352.2% vs ACHR's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -28.8% ROA vs HOVR's -121.4% |
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCAT leads in 4 of 6 categories
HOVR leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCAT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JOBY and HOVR operate at a comparable scale, with $78M and $0 in trailing revenue. RCAT is the more profitable business, keeping -2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $26M | $300,000 | $78M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$58M | -$709M | -$759M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | -$59M | -$618M | -$957M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$75M | -$512M | -$661M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +7.9% | — | +11.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.3% | -2431.0% | -10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.3% | -2060.7% | -12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.9% | -1705.7% | -8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | +43.5% | -9.1% |
Valuation Metrics
RCAT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $1.0B | $4.7B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $875M | $3.7B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.66x | -17.27x | -6.34x | -8.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 94.27x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 25.15x | 9999.00x | 183.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 35.65x | 5.03x | 1.78x | 5.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCAT leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCAT delivers a -33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-34 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOVR. HOVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCAT's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHR scores 5/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -33.6% | -37.8% | -74.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -121.4% | -28.8% | -32.9% | -52.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -71.0% | -89.6% | -54.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -42.9% | -44.3% | -49.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.07x | 0.02x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$149M | -$979M | -$180M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $168M | $1.0B | $241M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30,000 | $18M | $42M | $61M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCAT five years ago would be worth $26,979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,155 for HOVR. Over the past 12 months, HOVR leads with a +352.2% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCAT at 125.5% vs HOVR's -40.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.0% | +13.1% | -22.8% | -30.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +352.2% | +92.6% | -26.6% | +55.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.6% | +1047.3% | +193.5% | +128.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | +169.8% | -36.3% | +1.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | -97.8% | -37.0% | -4.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.2% | +125.5% | +43.2% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCAT and JOBY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOBY is the less volatile stock with a 2.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCAT's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCAT currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs ACHR's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.06x | 3.09x | 2.95x | 2.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.18 | $18.78 | $14.62 | $20.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $5.23 | $4.80 | $6.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.6% | +55.2% | +43.0% | +47.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 39.4 | 61.5 | 65.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 994K | 15.8M | 27.6M | 24.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOVR as "Buy", RCAT as "Buy", ACHR as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 96.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 54.3% for JOBY (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $12.33 | $15.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCAT leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 459. 8% for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY?
Over the past 5 years, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
(RCAT) delivered a total return of +169. 8%, compared to -78. 5% for New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JOBY returned +3. 5% versus RCAT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 84β versus Red Cat Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning RCAT is approximately 9% more volatile than JOBY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 459. 8% for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY?
New Horizon Aircraft Ltd.
(HOVR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOVR leads at 0. 0% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCAT leads at 3. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHR: 96.
3% to $12. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JOBY: +3. 5%, RCAT: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HOVR and RCAT and ACHR and JOBY?
These companies operate in different sectors (HOVR (Industrials) and RCAT (Technology) and ACHR (Industrials) and JOBY (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HOVR is a small-cap deep-value stock; RCAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.