Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Computer Hardware | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $105M | $1.03B | $4.82B | $10.69B | $187.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $26M | $300K | $78M | $92.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $-59M | $-618M | $-957M | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% | — | 11.2% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -234.6% | -2431.0% | -10.2% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 94.3x | — | — | 95.7x |
| Total Debt | $30K | $18M | $42M | $61M | $54.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $168M | $1.02B | $241M | $10.92B |
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Horizon Aircraf… (HOVR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Red Cat Holdings, I… (RCAT) | 100 | 1171.8 | +1071.8% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 327.3 | +227.3% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 251.0 | +151.0% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 114.8 | +14.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOVR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (19.2x vs 95.7x)
- +377.0% vs ACHR's -26.0%
RCAT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 459.8%, EPS growth 29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
Among these 5 stocks, ACHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JOBY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.84, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.84, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs HOVR's -414.1%
BA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.2%
- 99.4% 10Y total return vs JOBY's 3.5%
- 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
- Beta 0.99 vs RCAT's 3.09
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs HOVR's -414.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 95.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs RCAT's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +377.0% vs ACHR's -26.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs HOVR's -121.4% |
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BA leads in 3 of 6 categories
RCAT leads 1 • HOVR leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA and HOVR operate at a comparable scale, with $92.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. BA is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $26M | $300,000 | $78M | $92.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$58M | -$709M | -$759M | -$3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | -$59M | -$618M | -$957M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$75M | -$512M | -$661M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +7.9% | — | +11.2% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.3% | -2431.0% | -10.2% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.3% | -2060.7% | -12.3% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.9% | -1705.7% | -8.5% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +14.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | +43.5% | -9.1% | +31.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RCAT and ACHR and BA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.2x trailing earnings, HOVR trades at a 80% valuation discount to BA's 95.7x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $1.0B | $4.8B | $10.7B | $187.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $876M | $3.8B | $10.5B | $230.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.21x | -17.28x | -6.55x | -9.62x | 95.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 94.27x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 25.17x | 9999.00x | 200.04x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 38.78x | 5.04x | 1.84x | 6.37x | 33.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOVR. HOVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BA scores 6/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -33.6% | -37.8% | -74.2% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -121.4% | -28.8% | -32.9% | -52.1% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -71.0% | -89.6% | -54.7% | -9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -42.9% | -44.3% | -49.8% | -9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.07x | 0.02x | 0.04x | 9.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$149M | -$979M | -$180M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $168M | $1.0B | $241M | $10.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30,000 | $18M | $42M | $61M | $54.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCAT five years ago would be worth $26,865 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,341 for HOVR. Over the past 12 months, HOVR leads with a +377.0% total return vs ACHR's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCAT at 125.6% vs HOVR's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.6% | +13.2% | -20.3% | -24.3% | +4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +377.0% | +81.9% | -26.0% | +63.5% | +23.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +1048.4% | +202.8% | +148.7% | +20.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +168.7% | -34.3% | +9.9% | +1.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | -97.8% | -35.0% | +3.5% | +99.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.5% | +125.6% | +44.7% | +35.5% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BA is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCAT's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs ACHR's 44.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.06x | 3.09x | 2.95x | 2.84x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.18 | $18.78 | $14.62 | $20.95 | $254.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $5.43 | $4.80 | $6.42 | $176.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +55.2% | +44.3% | +51.9% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 38.1 | 58.3 | 58.9 | 57.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 15.8M | 27.8M | 24.5M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOVR as "Buy", RCAT as "Buy", ACHR as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", BA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 12.6% for BA (target: $267). BA is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $12.33 | $15.42 | $267.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
HOVR vs RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs BA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 34. 5% for The Boeing Company (BA). New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
On trailing P/E, New Horizon Aircraft Ltd.
(HOVR) is the cheapest at 19. 2x versus The Boeing Company at 95. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
Over the past 5 years, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
(RCAT) delivered a total return of +168. 7%, compared to -76. 6% for New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BA returned +99. 4% versus RCAT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boeing Company (BA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Red Cat Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning RCAT is approximately 211% more volatile than BA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 34. 5% for The Boeing Company (BA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCAT leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
The Boeing Company (BA) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
5% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOVR leads at 0. 0% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BA leads at 4. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHR: 90.
3% to $12. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA?
In this comparison, BA (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HOVR, RCAT, ACHR, JOBY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOVR or RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or BA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99)). Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BA: +99. 4%, RCAT: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOVR and RCAT and ACHR and JOBY and BA?
These companies operate in different sectors (HOVR (Industrials) and RCAT (Technology) and ACHR (Industrials) and JOBY (Industrials) and BA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HOVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.