HPQ vs AAPL

For growth investors, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for HP Inc. (HPQ). HP Inc. (HPQ) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apple Inc. (AAPL) a "Buy" — based on 110 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, HP Inc.

(HPQ) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, HP Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HP Inc. wins at 1. 29x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) delivered a total return of +125. 3%, compared to -23. 6% for HP Inc. (HPQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1175% versus HPQ's +158. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus HP Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning HPQ is approximately 4% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus 3. 2% for HP Inc. (HPQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apple Inc. grew EPS 22. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for HP Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAPL leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 4. 6% for HP Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus 6. 6% for HPQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, HP Inc. (HPQ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 29x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, HP Inc. (HPQ) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AAPL: 10. 3% to $317. 11.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

HP Inc. (HPQ) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 0. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1175% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1175%, HPQ: +158. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HPQ is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. HPQ pays a dividend while AAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.