Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HQI vs KELYA vs KFRC vs TBI vs MAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
HQI vs KELYA vs KFRC vs TBI vs MAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $172M | $349M | $790M | $182M | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $3.09B | $1.33B | $1.25B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-266M | $35M | $-53M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 26.3% | 27.2% | 28.4% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | -2.8% | 3.8% | -2.6% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.6x | 11.0x | 18.0x | — | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $159M | $70M | $171M | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $33M | $2M | $25M | $871M |
HQI vs KELYA vs KFRC vs TBI vs MAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HireQuest, Inc. (HQI) | 100 | 206.8 | +106.8% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 38.9 | -61.1% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HQI vs KELYA vs KFRC vs TBI vs MAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HQI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 21.9% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KFRC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs HQI's 140.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
TBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs HQI's -8.7%
- +51.0% vs MAN's -17.0%
MAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs HQI's -8.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.9% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.0% vs MAN's -17.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
HQI vs KELYA vs KFRC vs TBI vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HQI vs KELYA vs KFRC vs TBI vs MAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HQI leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • KELYA leads 0 • TBI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HQI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 566.6x HQI's $32M. HQI is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $3.1B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | -$54M | $56M | -$10M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$266M | $35M | -$53M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $66M | $43M | -$60M | -$161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +26.3% | +27.2% | +28.4% | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | -2.8% | +3.8% | -2.6% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | -8.6% | +2.6% | -4.3% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +2.1% | +3.3% | -4.8% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.8% | -100.0% | +0.1% | -100.0% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -2.1% | +2.2% | -37.5% | +36.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 53% valuation discount to HQI's 47.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $172M | $349M | $790M | $182M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $176M | $475M | $858M | $329M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.00x | -1.34x | 22.05x | -3.73x | -104.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.63x | 10.96x | 17.96x | — | 8.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.66x | — | 15.42x | 160.03x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.96x | 0.08x | 0.59x | 0.11x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.62x | 0.35x | 6.17x | 0.65x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.35x | 3.06x | 16.88x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HQI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. HQI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HQI scores 6/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.2% | -24.6% | +27.2% | -18.7% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | -11.3% | +9.2% | -8.1% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | -4.0% | +19.1% | -5.2% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | -4.3% | +20.1% | -5.3% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.16x | 0.56x | 0.62x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $126M | $68M | $146M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $33M | $2M | $25M | $871M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $159M | $70M | $171M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.47x | -12.07x | — | -46.19x | 1.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,130 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, TBI leads with a +51.0% total return vs MAN's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFRC at -4.8% vs TBI's -26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.8% | +13.1% | +39.2% | +36.6% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | -12.2% | +18.9% | +51.0% | -17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.3% | -34.2% | -13.8% | -60.2% | -46.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | -58.3% | -16.8% | -78.7% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.6% | -33.0% | +195.5% | -68.4% | -30.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | -13.0% | -4.8% | -26.4% | -18.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HQI and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBI's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HQI currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.01x | 0.53x | 1.13x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.49 | $14.94 | $47.48 | $7.78 | $47.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.38 | $7.98 | $24.49 | $3.18 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +64.9% | +91.0% | +77.2% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 63.7 | 65.6 | 83.2 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 361K | 305K | 386K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HQI as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", TBI as "Buy", MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -4.3% for TBI (target: $6). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs HQI's 1.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $15.00 | $71.00 | $5.75 | $37.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.2% | +3.6% | — | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $0.31 | $1.55 | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +6.4% | +0.6% | +2.7% |
HQI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HQI vs KELYA vs KFRC vs TBI vs MAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for HireQuest, Inc. (HQI). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HireQuest, Inc. (HQI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus HireQuest, Inc. at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -16. 8%, compared to -78. 7% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus TBI's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 114% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HireQuest, Inc. (HQI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -8. 7% for HireQuest, Inc. (HQI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HQI leads at 15. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN?
HireQuest, Inc.
(HQI) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HQI leads at 12. 6% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HQI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for HireQuest, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield), HQI (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. TBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HQI or KELYA or KFRC or TBI or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HQI and KELYA and KFRC and TBI and MAN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HQI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HQI, KELYA, KFRC, MAN pay a dividend while TBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.