Personal Products & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HRB vs FISV vs WEX vs INTU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
HRB vs FISV vs WEX vs INTU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $4.60B | $30.38B | $5.00B | $113.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.52B | $21.09B | $2.70B | $20.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $300M | $3.20B | $310M | $4.34B |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 60.8% | 57.4% | 81.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 24.4% | 24.7% | 27.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 7.0x | 7.4x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.35B | $29.12B | $4.86B | $6.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.00B | $798M | $906M | $2.88B |
HRB vs FISV vs WEX vs INTU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) | 100 | 213.4 | +113.4% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
| Intuit Inc. (INTU) | 100 | 140.1 | +40.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HRB vs FISV vs WEX vs INTU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HRB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 4.0%
- Beta 0.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.90x
- Beta 0.02 vs WEX's 1.16
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs INTU's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs INTU's 1.20
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 17.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.20
WEX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +19.0% vs FISV's -68.8%
INTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.6%, EPS growth 31.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 326.4% 10Y total return vs HRB's 140.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- 15.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 17.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs WEX's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs WEX's 1.16 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs INTU's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.0% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs WEX's 2.1%, ROIC 46.4% vs 9.6% |
HRB vs FISV vs WEX vs INTU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HRB vs FISV vs WEX vs INTU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRB leads in 2 of 6 categories
INTU leads 1 • FISV leads 1 • WEX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 13.9x HRB's $1.5B. INTU is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WEX's 11.5%. On growth, INTU holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $21.1B | $2.7B | $20.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $7.5B | $952M | $5.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $300M | $3.2B | $310M | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$649M | $4.0B | $460M | $6.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +60.8% | +57.4% | +81.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +24.4% | +24.7% | +27.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +15.2% | +11.5% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | +19.0% | +17.0% | +34.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -2.0% | +5.8% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | -29.1% | +22.7% | +47.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, HRB trades at a 72% valuation discount to INTU's 29.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs INTU's 2.04x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $30.4B | $5.0B | $113.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $58.7B | $9.0B | $117.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.26x | 8.96x | 17.03x | 29.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.26x | 7.01x | 7.43x | 17.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.25x | — | 2.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.29x | 6.63x | 8.89x | 20.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 1.43x | 1.88x | 6.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 56.05x | 1.21x | 4.20x | 5.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.68x | 7.00x | 15.94x | 18.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRB delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $12 for FISV. INTU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRB's 26.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTU scores 9/9 vs WEX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +12.4% | +27.0% | +22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.6% | +4.0% | +2.1% | +12.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +46.4% | +8.1% | +9.6% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +39.4% | +10.2% | +13.4% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 26.41x | 1.13x | 3.94x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $28.3B | $4.0B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $798M | $906M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $29.1B | $4.9B | $6.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.05x | 6.39x | 2.76x | 428.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRB five years ago would be worth $18,257 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,829 for FISV. Over the past 12 months, WEX leads with a +19.0% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRB at 8.1% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -13.4% | -2.8% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.5% | -68.8% | +19.0% | -35.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.3% | -52.5% | -18.2% | -1.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.6% | -51.7% | -26.5% | +5.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.6% | +9.7% | +60.9% | +326.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | -22.0% | -6.5% | -0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HRB and WEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRB is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WEX's 1.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WEX currently trades 77.2% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 0.94x | 1.16x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.62 | $191.91 | $186.85 | $813.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.16 | $52.91 | $120.03 | $342.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.1% | +29.6% | +77.2% | +50.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 36.5 | 38.0 | 44.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 5.3M | 518K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HRB and INTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRB as "Hold", FISV as "Buy", WEX as "Hold", INTU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.9% upside for INTU (target: $667) vs 13.0% for HRB (target: $41). For income investors, HRB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.96% vs INTU's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $74.64 | $177.67 | $666.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 60 | 32 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | — | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.44 | — | — | $4.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.5% | +19.4% | +16.0% | +2.4% |
HRB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). INTU leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HRB vs FISV vs WEX vs INTU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the stronger pick with 15. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU?
On trailing P/E, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus Intuit Inc. at 29. 8x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Intuit Inc. 's 1. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU?
Over the past 5 years, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) delivered a total return of +82. 6%, compared to -51. 7% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INTU returned +326. 4% versus FISV's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus WEX Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning WEX is approximately 4929% more volatile than HRB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuit Inc. (INTU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 26% for H&R Block, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is pulling ahead at 15. 6% versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuit Inc. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to 6. 6% for H&R Block, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INTU leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU?
Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 11. 4% for WEX Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 22. 0% for HRB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INTU leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Intuit Inc. 's 1. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Intuit Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INTU: 63. 9% to $666. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU?
In this comparison, HRB (4.
0% yield), INTU (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. FISV, WEX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HRB or FISV or WEX or INTU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), 4. 0% yield, +140. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRB: +140. 6%, WEX: +60. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HRB and FISV and WEX and INTU?
These companies operate in different sectors (HRB (Consumer Cyclical) and FISV (Technology) and WEX (Technology) and INTU (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HRB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; INTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock. HRB, INTU pay a dividend while FISV, WEX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.