Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HSHP vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
HSHP vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $737M | $342M | $3.09B | $730M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $132M | $153M | $1.04B | $275M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $15M | $84M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 72.0% | 45.4% | 33.0% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 51.6% | 23.4% | 13.6% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 6.9x | 8.0x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $689M | $290M | $1.07B | $537M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $63M | $500M | $84M |
HSHP vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Himalaya Shipping L… (HSHP) | 100 | 272.2 | +172.2% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 320.4 | +220.4% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) | 100 | 187.9 | +87.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSHP vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSHP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SHIP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.6x)
- +207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
SB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
- Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
- 8.2% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.8% margin vs SBLK's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs HSHP's 2.1%, ROIC 6.6% vs 6.3% |
HSHP vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HSHP vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SB leads in 3 of 6 categories
HSHP leads 1 • SHIP leads 1 • SBLK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSHP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 7.9x HSHP's $132M. SB is the more profitable business, keeping 16.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBLK's 8.1%. On growth, HSHP holds the edge at +42.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $132M | $153M | $1.0B | $275M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $68M | $311M | $131M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $15M | $84M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | -$6M | $209M | $55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.0% | +45.4% | +33.0% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +23.4% | +13.6% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +9.7% | +8.1% | +16.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | -4.2% | +20.0% | +19.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.2% | +18.6% | -2.7% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +84.4% | +58.3% | -31.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, SB trades at a 80% valuation discount to HSHP's 41.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SB's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSHP's 13.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $737M | $342M | $3.1B | $730M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $570M | $3.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.55x | 16.05x | 36.73x | 8.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.12x | 6.93x | 8.00x | 12.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.90x | 7.38x | 11.87x | 6.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 2.16x | 2.97x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.49x | 1.18x | 1.26x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.25x | 20.11x | 14.73x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSHP delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HSHP's 4.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +5.3% | +3.4% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +2.5% | +2.2% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +6.1% | +3.2% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +7.1% | +4.0% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.26x | 1.03x | 0.44x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $657M | $228M | $572M | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $63M | $500M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $689M | $290M | $1.1B | $537M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.34x | 1.68x | 2.08x | 2.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSHP five years ago would be worth $29,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,564 for SHIP. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +82.1% | +79.9% | +40.3% | +44.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +204.3% | +207.0% | +83.1% | +110.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +206.4% | +282.1% | +60.6% | +105.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.6% | +65.6% | +79.1% | +94.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.6% | -99.7% | +977.3% | +765.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.2% | +56.3% | +17.1% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSHP and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSHP currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs SB's 96.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.21x | 0.73x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.84 | $16.77 | $27.20 | $7.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.27 | $5.37 | $14.79 | $3.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +96.6% | +98.6% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 62.9 | 72.8 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 314K | 258K | 1.4M | 576K |
Analyst Outlook
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HSHP as "Sell", SHIP as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", SB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $29.00 | $4.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 3 | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +2.9% | +1.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.46 | $0.30 | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +4.0% |
SB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HSHP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
HSHP vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
On trailing P/E, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Himalaya Shipping Ltd. at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
Over the past 5 years, Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
(HSHP) delivered a total return of +199. 6%, compared to +65. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 66% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 4% for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHIP leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus 8. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSHP leads at 53. 2% versus 13. 5% for SBLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HSHP leads at 77. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Safe Bulkers, Inc. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is HSHP or SHIP or SBLK or SB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HSHP and SHIP and SBLK and SB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HSHP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.