HSII
Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$1.23B
5Y Perf.+166.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HSII vs RGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
Consulting Services
Market Cap$167M
5Y Perf.-56.0%
HSII vs RGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HSII | RGP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $167M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $507M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $-132M |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | -25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $101M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $516M | $86M |
HSII vs RGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HSII
RGP
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heidrick & Struggle… (HSII) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| Resources Connectio… (RGP) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSII vs RGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HSII leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Resources Connection, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HSII
Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
The Growth Play
HSII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth -84.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 240.0% 10Y total return vs RGP's -36.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 1.60x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
The Income Pick
RGP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 12.7%
- Beta 1.15, yield 12.7%, current ratio 2.70x
- 12.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HSII's 1.0%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HSII | 7.2% revenue growth vs RGP's -12.9% |
| Value | HSII | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | HSII | 3.1% margin vs RGP's -26.1% |
| Stability / Safety | HSII | Beta 0.77 vs RGP's 1.15 |
| Dividends | RGP | 12.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HSII's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HSII | +39.9% vs RGP's -16.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HSII | 2.9% ROA vs RGP's -45.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs -62.9% |
HSII vs RGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2025
HSII vs RGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLHSIILAGGINGRGP
RGPResources Connection,…
2leads
HSIIHeidrick & Struggles …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RGPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HSII4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RGP3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
HSII6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
HSII5/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
HSII2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
RGP2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSII is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 2.4x RGP's $507M. HSII is the more profitable business, keeping 3.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RGP's -26.1%. On growth, HSII holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HSIIHeidrick & Strugg… | RGPResources Connect… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $507M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | -$119M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | -$132M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $24M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +38.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | -25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | -26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | -19.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.9% | +81.7% |
HSII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RGP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HSIIHeidrick & Strugg… | RGPResources Connect… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $167M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $812M | $106M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 143.93x | -0.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.72x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.78x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.76x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.88x | 10.30x |
RGP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSII leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSII delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-68 for RGP. RGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HSII's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HSII scores 6/9 vs RGP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HSIIHeidrick & Strugg… | RGPResources Connect… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | -68.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | -62.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$415M | -$61M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $516M | $86M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $101M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -300.18x |
HSII leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSII leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSII five years ago would be worth $14,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,716 for RGP. Over the past 12 months, HSII leads with a +39.9% total return vs RGP's -16.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSII at 34.9% vs RGP's -26.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HSIIHeidrick & Strugg… | RGPResources Connect… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | -16.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.7% | -59.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.4% | -52.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.0% | -36.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | -26.0% |
HSII leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSII is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGP's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSII currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RGP's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HSIIHeidrick & Strugg… | RGPResources Connect… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.05 | $6.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.10 | $3.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +70.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.9 | 68.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 315K |
HSII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
RGP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HSII as "Hold" and RGP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 192.1% upside for RGP (target: $13) vs -0.0% for HSII (target: $59). For income investors, RGP offers the higher dividend yield at 12.67% vs HSII's 1.03%.
| Metric | HSIIHeidrick & Strugg… | RGPResources Connect… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.00 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +12.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +7.8% |
RGP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
HSII leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RGP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallHeidrick & Struggles Intern… (HSII)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HSII vs RGP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSII or RGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII) offers the better valuation at 143. 9x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HSII or RGP?
Over the past 5 years, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) delivered a total return of +47. 4%, compared to -52. 8% for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSII returned +240. 0% versus RGP's -36. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HSII or RGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Resources Connection, Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning RGP is approximately 48% more volatile than HSII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 22% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HSII or RGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -12. 9% for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. grew EPS -84. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1035. 5% for Resources Connection, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HSII leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HSII or RGP?
Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 8% net margin versus -34. 8% for Resources Connection, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSII leads at 0. 7% versus -35. 7% for RGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RGP leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HSII or RGP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RGP: 192.
1% to $13. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — HSII or RGP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) offers the highest yield at 12. 7%, versus 1. 0% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII).
08Is HSII or RGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 1. 0% yield, +240. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSII: +240. 0%, RGP: -36. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HSII and RGP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RGP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HSII: 14.2% · RGP: -19.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.