Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HUIZ vs ACMR vs EZGO vs FINV vs CNF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Mortgages
HUIZ vs ACMR vs EZGO vs FINV vs CNF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Semiconductors | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $791K | $3.92B | $624.00 | $2.90B | $1M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $901M | $39M | $13.07B | $626M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $94M | $-16M | $2.80B | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 44.4% | 7.8% | 79.3% | 87.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 12.1% | -11.1% | 19.4% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 33.9x | 29.7x | — | 0.6x | 4.5x |
| Total Debt | $91M | $303M | $11M | $34M | $4.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $233M | $766M | $517K | $4.67B | $338M |
HUIZ vs ACMR vs EZGO vs FINV vs CNF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huize Holding Limit… (HUIZ) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| EZGO Technologies L… (EZGO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| CNFinance Holdings … (CNF) | 100 | 10.4 | -89.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HUIZ vs ACMR vs EZGO vs FINV vs CNF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HUIZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs CNF's -60.9%
- +195.6% vs EZGO's -99.3%
Among these 5 stocks, EZGO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FINV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
- PEG 0.19 vs ACMR's 0.84
- Beta 1.12, yield 4.8%, current ratio 4.31x
CNF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.09 vs ACMR's 3.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs CNF's -60.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.2% margin vs CNF's -73.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.6% vs EZGO's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs EZGO's -23.1%, ROIC 12.9% vs -2.2% |
HUIZ vs ACMR vs EZGO vs FINV vs CNF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HUIZ vs ACMR vs EZGO vs FINV vs CNF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FINV leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 1 • HUIZ leads 0 • EZGO leads 0 • CNF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FINV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FINV is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.1B annually — 337.5x EZGO's $39M. FINV is the more profitable business, keeping 18.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNF's -73.1%. On growth, HUIZ holds the edge at +40.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $901M | $39M | $13.1B | $626M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $126M | -$3M | $3.3B | $198M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $94M | -$16M | $2.8B | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$69M | -$19M | $1.5B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +44.4% | +7.8% | +79.3% | +87.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +12.1% | -11.1% | +19.4% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +10.4% | -41.3% | +18.2% | -73.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | -7.6% | -48.4% | +21.9% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.2% | +9.4% | +21.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -76.1% | -26.4% | -2.1% | -8.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HUIZ and EZGO and FINV each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.9x trailing earnings, FINV trades at a 91% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FINV offers better value at 1.13x vs ACMR's 1.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $790,764 | $3.9B | $624 | $2.9B | $1M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$20M | $3.5B | $11M | $2.2B | $571M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.29x | 43.21x | -0.00x | 3.85x | -0.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.91x | 29.68x | — | 0.65x | 4.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | 1.13x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -8.95x | 27.49x | — | 5.76x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 4.35x | 0.00x | 1.51x | 0.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.06x | 0.00x | 0.59x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 6.89x | 0.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FINV leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FINV delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-31 for EZGO. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNF's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EZGO scores 5/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +6.1% | -31.4% | +17.4% | -1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +3.9% | -23.1% | +11.2% | -0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.0% | +7.0% | -2.2% | +12.9% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | +6.6% | -3.1% | +13.8% | -0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.16x | 0.22x | 0.00x | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$142M | -$463M | $11M | -$4.6B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $233M | $766M | $517,337 | $4.7B | $338M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $91M | $303M | $11M | $34M | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 20.44x | -69.66x | — | -0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for EZGO. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs EZGO's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs EZGO's -96.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.2% | +31.9% | -96.6% | +3.6% | -46.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | +195.6% | -99.3% | -35.3% | -56.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +487.9% | -100.0% | +45.1% | -88.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | +133.4% | -100.0% | -2.3% | -90.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | +3065.8% | -100.0% | -47.5% | -95.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.2% | +80.5% | -96.6% | +13.2% | -50.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACMR and CNF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNF is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs EZGO's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 3.24x | 0.14x | 1.12x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.53 | $71.65 | $17.24 | $10.90 | $8.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.19 | $19.26 | $0.07 | $4.50 | $2.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +82.6% | +0.4% | +47.0% | +36.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 60.7 | 29.4 | 58.4 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 292K | 1.2M | 10.0M | 1.3M | 5K |
Analyst Outlook
FINV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUIZ as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy", FINV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.0% upside for FINV (target: $6) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, FINV offers the higher dividend yield at 4.80% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 | — | $5.94 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | +4.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | $1.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +3.3% | +23.7% |
FINV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
HUIZ vs ACMR vs EZGO vs FINV vs CNF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). FinVolution Group (FINV) offers the better valuation at 3. 9x trailing P/E (0. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF?
On trailing P/E, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the cheapest at 3.
9x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, FinVolution Group is actually cheaper at 0. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FinVolution Group wins at 0. 19x versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 0. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for EZGO Technologies Ltd. (EZGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus EZGO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
09β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 3440% more volatile than CNF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 118% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FinVolution Group grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to -122. 3% for CNFinance Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF?
FinVolution Group (FINV) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
2% net margin versus -73. 1% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FINV leads at 19. 4% versus -11. 2% for CNF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNF leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 0. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FinVolution Group (FINV) trades at 0. 6x forward P/E versus 33. 9x for Huize Holding Limited — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FINV: 16. 0% to $5. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF?
In this comparison, FINV (4.
8% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HUIZ, EZGO, CNF do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HUIZ or ACMR or EZGO or FINV or CNF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
09)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNF: -95. 8%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HUIZ and ACMR and EZGO and FINV and CNF?
These companies operate in different sectors (HUIZ (Financial Services) and ACMR (Technology) and EZGO (Consumer Cyclical) and FINV (Financial Services) and CNF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HUIZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; EZGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FINV pays a dividend while HUIZ, ACMR, EZGO, CNF do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.