Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HUIZ vs EZGO vs ACMR vs AIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
HUIZ vs EZGO vs ACMR vs AIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $791K | $624.00 | $3.92B | $463M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $39M | $901M | $436M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $-16M | $94M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 7.8% | 44.4% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | -11.1% | 12.1% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | 33.9x | — | 29.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $91M | $11M | $303M | $287M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $233M | $517K | $766M | $49M |
HUIZ vs EZGO vs ACMR vs AIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huize Holding Limit… (HUIZ) | 100 | 30.9 | -69.1% |
| EZGO Technologies L… (EZGO) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 256.7 | +156.7% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 74.4 | -25.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HUIZ vs EZGO vs ACMR vs AIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HUIZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EZGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 22.4%, current ratio 3.21x
- Beta 0.14, current ratio 3.21x
- Beta 0.14 vs ACMR's 3.24
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs AIOT's -28.7%
- Better valuation composite
- 10.4% margin vs EZGO's -41.3%
- 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AIOT's 22.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
AIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.70, yield 22.2%
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs HUIZ's 4.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs HUIZ's 4.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs EZGO's -41.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AIOT's 22.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.6% vs EZGO's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs EZGO's -23.1%, ROIC 7.0% vs -2.2% |
HUIZ vs EZGO vs ACMR vs AIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HUIZ vs EZGO vs ACMR vs AIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
AIOT leads 1 • HUIZ leads 0 • EZGO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUIZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 34.5x EZGO's $39M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EZGO's -41.3%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $39M | $901M | $436M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$3M | $126M | $69M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | -$16M | $94M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$19M | -$69M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +7.8% | +44.4% | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -11.1% | +12.1% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -41.3% | +10.4% | -7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | -48.4% | -7.6% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.2% | +21.9% | +9.4% | +47.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -26.4% | -76.1% | -25.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HUIZ and EZGO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACMR's 27.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIOT's 44.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $790,764 | $624 | $3.9B | $463M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$20M | $11M | $3.5B | $701M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.29x | -0.00x | 43.21x | -7.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.91x | — | 29.68x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.22x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -8.95x | — | 27.49x | 44.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.00x | 4.35x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.00x | 2.06x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-31 for EZGO. ACMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EZGO scores 5/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | -31.4% | +6.1% | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -23.1% | +3.9% | -3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.0% | -2.2% | +7.0% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | -3.1% | +6.6% | -5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.22x | 0.16x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$142M | $11M | -$463M | $238M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $233M | $517,337 | $766M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $91M | $11M | $303M | $287M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -69.66x | 20.44x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for EZGO. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs EZGO's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs EZGO's -96.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.2% | -96.6% | +31.9% | -35.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | -99.3% | +195.6% | -32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | -100.0% | +487.9% | -28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -100.0% | +133.4% | -28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | -100.0% | +3065.8% | -28.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.2% | -96.6% | +80.5% | -10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EZGO and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EZGO is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs EZGO's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.14x | 3.24x | 2.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.53 | $17.24 | $71.65 | $6.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.19 | $0.07 | $19.26 | $2.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +0.4% | +82.6% | +56.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 29.4 | 60.7 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 292K | 10.0M | 1.2M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUIZ as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy", AIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.3% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 22.15% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $40.00 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | +22.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.11 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.6% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AIOT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
HUIZ vs EZGO vs ACMR vs AIOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT?
On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for EZGO Technologies Ltd. (EZGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus EZGO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EZGO Technologies Ltd.
(EZGO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 2187% more volatile than EZGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 64% for PowerFleet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus 4. 5% for Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PowerFleet, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1271. 5% for EZGO Technologies Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -42. 4% for EZGO Technologies Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -9. 5% for EZGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIOT leads at 53. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 33. 9x for Huize Holding Limited — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIOT: 135. 3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT?
In this comparison, AIOT (22.
2% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HUIZ, EZGO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HUIZ or EZGO or ACMR or AIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EZGO Technologies Ltd.
(EZGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EZGO: -100. 0%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HUIZ and EZGO and ACMR and AIOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (HUIZ (Financial Services) and EZGO (Consumer Cyclical) and ACMR (Technology) and AIOT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HUIZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EZGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. AIOT pays a dividend while HUIZ, EZGO, ACMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.