Financial - Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HVII vs RSVR vs WMG vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Information Technology Services
HVII vs RSVR vs WMG vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Entertainment | Entertainment | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $271M | $668M | $16.21B | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $170M | $7.13B | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48K | $7M | $452M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.4% | 44.4% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.7% | 12.7% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 101.8x | 23.4x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $77K | $394M | $4.61B | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20K | $21M | $532M | $1.35B |
HVII vs RSVR vs WMG vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hennessy Capital In… (HVII) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| Reservoir Media, In… (RSVR) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 47.4 | -52.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HVII vs RSVR vs WMG vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HVII is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs WMG's 15.3%
- Beta 0.05, current ratio 0.07x
- Beta 0.05 vs PSFE's 2.35
RSVR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth -17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 1.20x
- 9.6% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2%
- +39.3% vs PSFE's -37.1%
WMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 2.4%
- 6.3% margin vs PSFE's -10.7%
- 2.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- 4.5% ROA vs HVII's -4.8%
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 23.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 23.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs PSFE's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.3% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs HVII's -4.8% |
HVII vs RSVR vs WMG vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HVII vs RSVR vs WMG vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RSVR leads in 2 of 6 categories
WMG leads 2 • PSFE leads 1 • HVII leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RSVR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMG and HVII operate at a comparable scale, with $7.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. WMG is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, WMG holds the edge at +16.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $170M | $7.1B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $66M | $1.3B | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $7M | $452M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $12.8B | $694M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +64.4% | +44.4% | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.7% | +12.7% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +3.9% | +6.3% | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +75.5% | +9.7% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.8% | +16.7% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -58.3% | -100.0% | -183.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 44.3x trailing earnings, WMG trades at a 48% valuation discount to RSVR's 84.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMG's 17.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $668M | $16.2B | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $271M | $1.0B | $20.3B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5788.89x | 84.83x | 44.34x | -2.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 101.80x | 23.45x | 4.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.95x | 17.55x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.21x | 2.42x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.83x | 21.28x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 30.08x | 2.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMG delivers a 55.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. RSVR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMG's 6.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RSVR scores 6/9 vs WMG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.0% | +55.9% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.8% | +0.0% | +4.5% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.7% | +11.4% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.2% | +4.6% | +12.8% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.08x | 6.09x | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56,785 | $372M | $4.1B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20,005 | $21M | $532M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76,790 | $394M | $4.6B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.37x | 5.43x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSVR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HVII five years ago would be worth $10,611 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, RSVR leads with a +39.3% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSVR at 17.7% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +36.1% | +2.6% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.4% | +39.3% | +5.6% | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +62.9% | +16.4% | -34.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +0.7% | -6.2% | -94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +1.6% | +15.3% | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | +17.7% | +5.2% | -13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HVII and RSVR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HVII is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSVR currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 0.82x | 0.65x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.99 | $10.32 | $34.63 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.98 | $6.97 | $23.34 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +98.6% | +89.6% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 62.4 | 66.2 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 113K | 2.0M | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
WMG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RSVR as "Buy", WMG as "Buy", PSFE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for WMG (target: $36) vs 6.5% for PSFE (target: $10). WMG is the only dividend payer here at 2.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.50 | $35.50 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 24 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.74 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +20.9% |
RSVR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WMG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HVII vs RSVR vs WMG vs PSFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Reservoir Media, Inc.
(RSVR) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) offers the better valuation at 44. 3x trailing P/E (23. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Reservoir Media, Inc. (RSVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE?
On trailing P/E, Warner Music Group Corp.
(WMG) is the cheapest at 44. 3x versus Reservoir Media, Inc. at 84. 8x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE?
Over the past 5 years, Hennessy Capital Investment Corp.
VII (HVII) delivered a total return of +6. 1%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMG returned +15. 3% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Capital Investment Corp.
VII (HVII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 4648% more volatile than HVII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reservoir Media, Inc. (RSVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 6% for Warner Music Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Reservoir Media, Inc.
(RSVR) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Music Group Corp. grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RSVR leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE?
Warner Music Group Corp.
(WMG) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 4% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSVR leads at 22. 1% versus 0. 0% for HVII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSVR leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 101. 8x for Reservoir Media, Inc. — 97. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMG: 14. 4% to $35. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE?
In this comparison, WMG (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. HVII, RSVR, PSFE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HVII or RSVR or WMG or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Capital Investment Corp.
VII (HVII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HVII: +6. 1%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HVII and RSVR and WMG and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (HVII (Financial Services) and RSVR (Communication Services) and WMG (Communication Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WMG pays a dividend while HVII, RSVR, PSFE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 38%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.