Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HWBK logo
HWBK
MOFG logo
MOFG
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HWBK vs MOFG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$260M
5Y Perf.+115.4%
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.+131.6%

HWBK vs MOFG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HWBK logoHWBK
MOFG logoMOFG
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$260M$1.02B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$351M
Net Income (TTM)$24M$58M
Gross Margin71.3%63.2%
Operating Margin26.0%21.3%
Forward P/E11.0x13.8x
Total Debt$155M$117M
Cash & Equiv.$105M$205M

HWBK vs MOFGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HWBK
MOFG
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK)100215.4+115.4%
MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG)100231.6+131.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HWBK vs MOFG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HWBK leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇HWBK emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HWBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
  • Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 31.4%
  • 301.1% 10Y total return vs MOFG's 96.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +71.2% vs HWBK's +35.8%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHWBK logoHWBK2.2% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
ValueHWBK logoHWBKLower P/E (11.0x vs 13.8x)
Quality / MarginsHWBK logoHWBKEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHWBK logoHWBKBeta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34
DividendsHWBK logoHWBK2.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs MOFG's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)MOFG logoMOFG+71.2% vs HWBK's +35.8%
Efficiency (ROA)HWBK logoHWBKEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs MOFG's 0.7%

HWBK vs MOFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking
39.9%$4M
Service
37.5%$4M
Fiduciary and Trust
22.5%$2M
MOFGMidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$69M

HWBK vs MOFG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHWBKLAGGINGMOFG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MOFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $351M annually — 3.1x HWBK's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.2% (HWBK) to 16.7% (MOFG).

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$351M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$58M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M$79M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.3%+63.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+21.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.2%+16.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.4%+22.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+113.6%
HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — HWBK and MOFG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…
Market CapShares × price$260M$1.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$310M$929M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.99x-13.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.32x4.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.51x1.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.37x16.74x
Evenly matched — HWBK and MOFG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HWBK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HWBK delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $10 for MOFG. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWBK's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HWBK scores 6/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+10.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.1%-9.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.2%-9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.89x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$50M-$88M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$105M$205M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$117M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.92x0.67x
HWBK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,984 for MOFG. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs HWBK's +35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 33.6% vs HWBK's 30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%+30.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.8%+71.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.3%+79.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+301.1%+96.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+33.6%
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x1.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.98$49.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.07$26.52
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.474.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K0
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, HWBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs MOFG's 1.97%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts8
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises140
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$0.97
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+0.0%
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HWBK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallHawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HWBK vs MOFG: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HWBK or MOFG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or MOFG?

Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to +79. 8% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus MOFG's +96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — HWBK or MOFG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately 283% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 89% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — HWBK or MOFG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — HWBK or MOFG?

Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or MOFG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 2. 0% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG).

07

Is HWBK or MOFG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between HWBK and MOFG?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.