Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HWBK vs MOFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
HWBK vs MOFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $260M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $351M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $205M |
HWBK vs MOFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK) | 100 | 215.4 | +115.4% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 231.6 | +131.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWBK vs MOFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 31.4%
- 301.1% 10Y total return vs MOFG's 96.2%
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +71.2% vs HWBK's +35.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs MOFG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.2% vs HWBK's +35.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
HWBK vs MOFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HWBK vs MOFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $351M annually — 3.1x HWBK's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.2% (HWBK) to 16.7% (MOFG).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $351M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.3% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +113.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HWBK and MOFG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $260M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $929M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.99x | -13.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.32x | 4.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.37x | 16.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWBK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWBK delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $10 for MOFG. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWBK's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HWBK scores 6/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | -9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | -9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | -$88M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $205M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 0.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,984 for MOFG. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs HWBK's +35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 33.6% vs HWBK's 30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +71.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | +79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | +96.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.98 | $49.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.07 | $26.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 74.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HWBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs MOFG's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.0% |
HWBK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
HWBK vs MOFG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWBK or MOFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or MOFG?
Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to +79. 8% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus MOFG's +96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HWBK or MOFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately 283% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 89% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HWBK or MOFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HWBK or MOFG?
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or MOFG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 2. 0% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG).
07Is HWBK or MOFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HWBK and MOFG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.