Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HWC vs UBSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HWC
Hancock Whitney Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.55B
5Y Perf.+215.0%
UBSI
United Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.06B
5Y Perf.+49.3%

HWC vs UBSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HWC logoHWC
UBSI logoUBSI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$5.55B$6.06B
Revenue (TTM)$2.02B$1.82B
Net Income (TTM)$486M$465M
Gross Margin73.1%65.4%
Operating Margin31.0%32.4%
Forward P/E10.7x12.0x
Total Debt$1.34B$921M
Cash & Equiv.$563M$2.54B

HWC vs UBSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HWC
UBSI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Hancock Whitney Cor… (HWC)100315.0+215.0%
United Bankshares, … (UBSI)100149.3+49.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HWC vs UBSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UBSI leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Hancock Whitney Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HWC
Hancock Whitney Corporation
The Banking Pick

HWC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 223.3% 10Y total return vs UBSI's 52.4%
  • Lower P/E (10.7x vs 12.0x)
  • +31.0% vs UBSI's +28.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
UBSI
United Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

UBSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.4%
  • Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 18.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 28.21x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUBSI logoUBSI12.3% NII/revenue growth vs HWC's -1.5%
ValueHWC logoHWCLower P/E (10.7x vs 12.0x)
Quality / MarginsUBSI logoUBSIEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs HWC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyUBSI logoUBSIBeta 0.95 vs HWC's 1.14, lower leverage
DividendsUBSI logoUBSI3.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HWC's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)HWC logoHWC+31.0% vs UBSI's +28.2%
Efficiency (ROA)UBSI logoUBSIEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs HWC's 0.4%

HWC vs UBSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HWCHancock Whitney Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
29.3%$99M
Fiduciary and Trust
26.4%$90M
Credit and Debit Card
25.4%$86M
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
14.5%$49M
Mortgage Banking
4.4%$15M
UBSIUnited Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
37.6%$39M
Fiduciary and Trust
21.9%$23M
Service, Other
19.1%$20M
Mortgage Banking
9.2%$10M
Credit Card
7.6%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.5%$5M

HWC vs UBSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUBSILAGGINGHWC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UBSI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

HWC and UBSI operate at a comparable scale, with $2.0B and $1.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 25.5% (UBSI) to 24.1% (HWC).

MetricHWC logoHWCHancock Whitney C…UBSI logoUBSIUnited Bankshares…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.0B$1.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$656M$590M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$486M$465M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$523M$487M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.1%+65.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+31.0%+32.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.1%+25.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.9%+26.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.4%+30.0%
UBSI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.0x trailing earnings, HWC trades at a 10% valuation discount to UBSI's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBSI's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HWC's 9.7x.

MetricHWC logoHWCHancock Whitney C…UBSI logoUBSIUnited Bankshares…
Market CapShares × price$5.6B$6.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.3B$4.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.99x13.28x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.70x11.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.08x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.65x7.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.75x3.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.29x1.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.62x12.60x
HWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UBSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HWC delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for UBSI. UBSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWC's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBSI scores 7/9 vs HWC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHWC logoHWCHancock Whitney C…UBSI logoUBSIUnited Bankshares…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.1%+8.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.6%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.2%+3.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$775M-$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$563M$2.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.3B$921M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.23x1.01x
UBSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HWC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWC five years ago would be worth $15,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,368 for UBSI. Over the past 12 months, HWC leads with a +31.0% total return vs UBSI's +28.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWC at 29.6% vs UBSI's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHWC logoHWCHancock Whitney C…UBSI logoUBSIUnited Bankshares…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+7.2%+14.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.0%+28.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+117.7%+61.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.2%+23.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+223.3%+52.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+29.6%+17.4%
HWC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UBSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

UBSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HWC's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBSI currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs HWC's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHWC logoHWCHancock Whitney C…UBSI logoUBSIUnited Bankshares…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$75.43$45.93
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$52.89$34.10
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.3%+94.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.155.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded779K916K
UBSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

UBSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates HWC as "Buy" and UBSI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.2% upside for HWC (target: $78) vs 7.5% for UBSI (target: $47). For income investors, UBSI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.42% vs HWC's 2.68%.

MetricHWC logoHWCHancock Whitney C…UBSI logoUBSIUnited Bankshares…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$77.75$46.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts2311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+3.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises35
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.82$1.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.4%+2.1%
UBSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

UBSI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HWC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallUnited Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HWC vs UBSI: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HWC or UBSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, United Bankshares, Inc.

(UBSI) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC). Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HWC or UBSI?

On trailing P/E, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) is the cheapest at 12.

0x versus United Bankshares, Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, Hancock Whitney Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HWC or UBSI?

Over the past 5 years, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) delivered a total return of +52.

2%, compared to +23. 7% for United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWC returned +223. 3% versus UBSI's +52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HWC or UBSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Bankshares, Inc.

(UBSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Hancock Whitney Corporation's 1. 14β — meaning HWC is approximately 20% more volatile than UBSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 30% for Hancock Whitney Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HWC or UBSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Bankshares, Inc.

(UBSI) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -1. 5% for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Hancock Whitney Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HWC or UBSI?

United Bankshares, Inc.

(UBSI) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 5% net margin versus 24. 1% for Hancock Whitney Corporation — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBSI leads at 32. 4% versus 31. 0% for HWC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWC leads at 73. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HWC or UBSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) trades at 10.

7x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for United Bankshares, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HWC: 14. 2% to $77. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HWC or UBSI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 2. 7% for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC).

09

Is HWC or UBSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, United Bankshares, Inc.

(UBSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 3. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBSI: +52. 4%, HWC: +223. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HWC and UBSI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HWC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UBSI

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HWC and UBSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HWC: -1.5% · UBSI: 12.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(HWC: 24.1% · UBSI: 25.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HWC: 12.0x · UBSI: 13.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.