Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HYMC vs CDE vs HL vs EXK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.55B
5Y Perf.-69.3%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.63B
5Y Perf.+215.0%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+428.6%

HYMC vs CDE vs HL vs EXK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HYMC logoHYMC
CDE logoCDE
HL logoHL
EXK logoEXK
IndustryGoldGoldGoldOther Precious Metals
Market Cap$3.55B$11.63B$12.13B$2.99B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.57B$1.57B$330M
Net Income (TTM)$-77M$799M$559M$-94M
Gross Margin35.4%50.9%9.3%
Operating Margin39.4%44.1%-1.7%
Forward P/E9.1x19.1x14.3x
Total Debt$0.00$365M$299M$120M
Cash & Equiv.$182M$554M$242M$106M

HYMC vs CDE vs HL vs EXKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HYMC
CDE
HL
EXK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Hycroft Mining Hold… (HYMC)10030.7-69.3%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100315.0+215.0%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100528.6+428.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HYMC vs CDE vs HL vs EXK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. CDE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
The Defensive Pick

HYMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
  • Beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
  • Beta 1.21 vs CDE's 1.81
  • +10.5% vs EXK's +193.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Growth Play

CDE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x)
Best for: growth exposure
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Income Pick

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.1%
  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
  • 35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
  • 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Value Angle

EXK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x)
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
Stability / SafetyHYMC logoHYMCBeta 1.21 vs CDE's 1.81
DividendsHL logoHL0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HYMC logoHYMC+10.5% vs EXK's +193.4%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs -90.1%

HYMC vs CDE vs HL vs EXK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HYMCHycroft Mining Holding Corporation
FY 2022
Gold
97.1%$32M
Silver
2.9%$980,000
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000

HYMC vs CDE vs HL vs EXK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDELAGGINGEXK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CDE and HYMC operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.6B$1.6B$330M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$83M$1.2B$853M$49M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$77M$799M$559M-$94M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$105M$915M$472M-$129M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.4%+50.9%+9.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.4%+44.1%-1.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.1%+35.6%-28.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.6%+30.0%-39.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+137.8%+57.4%+154.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-14.9%+4.9%-160.0%-97.5%
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 45% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$11.6B$12.1B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.4B$11.4B$12.2B$3.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-41.36x20.13x36.92x-78.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.10x19.07x14.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.19x17.25x76.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.62x8.53x13.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.87x3.56x4.58x5.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.48x39.11x
CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-66 for HYMC. CDE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs HYMC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-65.7%+15.2%+22.5%-18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-33.4%+11.2%+16.3%-9.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-90.1%+23.5%+15.3%+1.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-22.8%+23.9%+16.8%+1.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92684
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.12x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$182M-$188M$57M$14M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$182M$554M$242M$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$365M$299M$120M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.35x47.33x19.04x-39.17x
CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HYMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,720 for HYMC. Over the past 12 months, HYMC leads with a +1046.9% total return vs EXK's +193.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYMC at 111.3% vs EXK's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+59.3%+3.2%-4.1%+12.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1046.9%+216.1%+271.0%+193.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+843.7%+414.6%+194.9%+144.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.8%+96.0%+150.3%+61.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.5%+149.9%+360.6%+182.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+111.3%+72.6%+43.4%+34.6%
HYMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HYMC and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HYMC is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXK currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x1.81x1.26x1.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.73$27.77$34.17$15.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.71$5.55$4.68$3.14
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.2%+65.2%+52.9%+67.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.549.346.647.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.0M22.2M15.4M9.4M
Evenly matched — HYMC and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: HYMC as "Hold", CDE as "Buy", HL as "Hold", EXK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13).

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$23.83$12.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1212614
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallCoeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HYMC vs CDE vs HL vs EXK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK?

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to -2. 8% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus HYMC's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

21β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 50% more volatile than HYMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 0. 0% for HYMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is HYMC or CDE or HL or EXK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

26), +360. 6% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +360. 6%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HYMC and CDE and HL and EXK?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HYMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HYMC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.