IAG vs CDE

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 77. 8% for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the cheapest at 15.

9x versus Coeur Mining, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, IAMGOLD Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IAMGOLD Corporation wins at 0. 12x versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 0. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) delivered a total return of +467.

5%, compared to +103. 0% for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAG returned +405. 5% versus CDE's +137. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

93β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 95% more volatile than IAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 20% for IAMGOLD Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 77. 8% for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc. grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to -22. 7% for IAMGOLD Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IAG leads at 44. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 23. 3% for IAMGOLD Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IAG leads at 38. 9% versus 36. 3% for CDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAG leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 0. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 9. 4x for Coeur Mining, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAG: 59. 5% to $29. 50.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

93), +405. 5% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IAG: +405. 5%, CDE: +137. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.