Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IAG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
IAG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $11.01B | $6.75B | $12.09B | $96.80B | $12.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.42B | $1.82B | $2.57B | $11.87B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.01B | $510M | $799M | $4.45B | $559M |
| Gross Margin | 47.9% | 46.4% | 35.4% | 57.3% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 44.8% | 40.0% | 39.4% | 52.9% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 8.0x | 9.4x | 13.9x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $840M | $1.30B | $365M | $321M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $421M | $868M | $554M | $2.87B | $242M |
IAG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) | 100 | 500.0 | +400.0% |
| Eldorado Gold Corpo… (EGO) | 100 | 406.5 | +306.5% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 322.8 | +222.8% |
| Agnico Eagle Mines … (AEM) | 100 | 301.9 | +201.9% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 560.5 | +460.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IAG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IAG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 450.0% 10Y total return vs HL's 373.7%
- PEG 0.11 vs AEM's 0.42
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 20.7x)
- 17.6% ROA vs EGO's 8.0%, ROIC 19.1% vs 13.3%
Among these 5 stocks, EGO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CDE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs EGO's 39.9%
AEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.02x
- Beta 0.66, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.02x
- 37.5% margin vs EGO's 28.0%
HL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +278.6% vs AEM's +69.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs EGO's 39.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs EGO's 28.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CDE's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +278.6% vs AEM's +69.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs EGO's 8.0%, ROIC 19.1% vs 13.3% |
IAG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IAG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AEM leads in 4 of 6 categories
EGO leads 1 • IAG leads 1 • CDE leads 0 • HL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEM is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.9B annually — 7.5x HL's $1.6B. AEM is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGO's 28.0%. On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $1.8B | $2.6B | $11.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $993M | $1.2B | $7.9B | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $510M | $799M | $4.4B | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | -$184M | $915M | $4.4B | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.9% | +46.4% | +35.4% | +57.3% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +40.0% | +39.4% | +52.9% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +28.0% | +31.1% | +37.5% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | -10.1% | +35.6% | +37.1% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.9% | +34.5% | +137.8% | +64.9% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | +134.6% | +4.9% | +199.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EGO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, EGO trades at a 64% valuation discount to HL's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IAG offers better value at 0.24x vs AEM's 0.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.0B | $6.8B | $12.1B | $96.8B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.4B | $7.2B | $11.9B | $94.3B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.12x | 13.61x | 20.62x | 21.81x | 37.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.62x | 7.97x | 9.37x | 13.94x | 20.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | 0.50x | 0.39x | 0.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.31x | 6.91x | 11.63x | 11.82x | 17.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.79x | 3.65x | 5.84x | 8.13x | 8.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.57x | 1.64x | 3.65x | 3.93x | 4.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.27x | — | 18.15x | 22.71x | 40.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IAG delivers a 25.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $12 for EGO. AEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGO's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEM scores 8/9 vs CDE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.8% | +12.4% | +15.2% | +19.3% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.6% | +8.0% | +11.2% | +13.7% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.1% | +13.3% | +23.5% | +21.9% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | +13.5% | +23.9% | +20.9% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.30x | 0.11x | 0.01x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $419M | $428M | -$188M | -$2.5B | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $421M | $868M | $554M | $2.9B | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $840M | $1.3B | $365M | $321M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.83x | 20.66x | 47.33x | 73.32x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IAG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IAG five years ago would be worth $57,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,396 for CDE. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +278.6% total return vs AEM's +69.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IAG at 79.4% vs EGO's 42.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | -3.4% | +5.8% | +13.6% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.0% | +75.1% | +166.3% | +69.9% | +278.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +477.2% | +186.9% | +427.3% | +233.6% | +203.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +471.9% | +211.1% | +104.0% | +194.1% | +161.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +450.0% | +63.3% | +156.0% | +363.7% | +373.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +79.4% | +42.1% | +74.1% | +49.4% | +44.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEM currently trades 75.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.74x | 1.89x | 0.66x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.87 | $51.16 | $27.77 | $255.24 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.06 | $17.18 | $6.20 | $103.38 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +66.8% | +66.8% | +75.7% | +54.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 51.0 | 46.0 | 41.7 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 3.0M | 22.1M | 2.5M | 15.2M |
Analyst Outlook
AEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IAG as "Buy", EGO as "Hold", CDE as "Buy", AEM as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for IAG (target: $30) vs 19.3% for HL (target: $22). AEM is the only dividend payer here at 0.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $52.67 | $27.20 | $237.71 | $22.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 24 | 21 | 31 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.7% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.45 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.2% | +0.1% | +0.7% | +0.0% |
AEM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IAG vs EGO vs CDE vs AEM vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 39. 9% for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO). Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL?
On trailing P/E, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the cheapest at 13.
6x versus Hecla Mining Company at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, IAMGOLD Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IAMGOLD Corporation wins at 0. 11x versus Agnico Eagle Mines Limited's 0. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL?
Over the past 5 years, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) delivered a total return of +471.
9%, compared to +104. 0% for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAG returned +450. 0% versus EGO's +63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning CDE is approximately 187% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Eldorado Gold Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 39. 9% for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -22. 7% for IAMGOLD Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IAG leads at 44. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL?
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
5% net margin versus 22. 6% for Hecla Mining Company — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus 36. 3% for CDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Agnico Eagle Mines Limited's 0. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Hecla Mining Company — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAG: 57. 8% to $29. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL?
In this comparison, AEM (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. IAG, EGO, CDE, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IAG or EGO or CDE or AEM or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 0. 7% yield, +363. 7% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +363. 7%, CDE: +156. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IAG and EGO and CDE and AEM and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
AEM pays a dividend while IAG, EGO, CDE, HL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.