Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IAUX vs EXK vs MUX vs USAS vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
Other Precious Metals
Industrial Materials
Gold
IAUX vs EXK vs MUX vs USAS vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Other Precious Metals | Other Precious Metals | Industrial Materials | Gold |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $2.99B | $1.39B | $2.03B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $89M | $330M | $162M | $109M | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-175M | $-94M | $74M | $-61M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | -10.9% | 9.3% | 32.9% | 3.3% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | -98.7% | -1.7% | 22.2% | -25.5% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.3x | 22.2x | 26.3x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $175M | $120M | $926K | $24M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $106M | $51M | $20M | $242M |
IAUX vs EXK vs MUX vs USAS vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 192.2 | +92.2% |
| McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) | 100 | 194.8 | +94.8% |
| Americas Gold and S… (USAS) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 306.1 | +206.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IAUX vs EXK vs MUX vs USAS vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IAUX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth 20.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- 77.2% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3%
- Beta 0.85 vs USAS's 2.31
EXK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x)
MUX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
- 45.7% margin vs IAUX's -195.9%
- 0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
USAS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +418.7% vs IAUX's +142.2%
HL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
- 16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.2% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.7% margin vs IAUX's -195.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs USAS's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +418.7% vs IAUX's +142.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3% |
IAUX vs EXK vs MUX vs USAS vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IAUX vs EXK vs MUX vs USAS vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HL leads in 2 of 6 categories
USAS leads 1 • MUX leads 1 • IAUX leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 17.6x IAUX's $89M. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IAUX's -195.9%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $89M | $330M | $162M | $109M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$84M | $49M | $61M | -$7M | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$175M | -$94M | $74M | -$61M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | -$129M | -$24M | -$52M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +9.3% | +32.9% | +3.3% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -98.7% | -1.7% | +22.2% | -25.5% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -195.9% | -28.4% | +45.7% | -56.2% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.6% | -39.1% | -14.7% | -47.7% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.3% | +154.0% | -100.0% | +45.6% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.8% | -97.5% | +4.9% | +55.3% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EXK and MUX each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.9x trailing earnings, HL trades at a 7% valuation discount to MUX's 39.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HL's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3.0B | $1.4B | $2.0B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $3.0B | $1.3B | $2.0B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.52x | -78.08x | 39.61x | -15.19x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.34x | 22.21x | 26.30x | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 76.02x | 74.65x | — | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.04x | 13.72x | 7.03x | 20.24x | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.89x | 5.07x | 2.31x | 12.65x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IAUX's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs USAS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.8% | -18.4% | +13.6% | -122.1% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.0% | -9.2% | +9.0% | -26.1% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.6% | +1.5% | -1.9% | -26.3% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +1.6% | -1.9% | -21.6% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.25x | 0.00x | 0.45x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111M | $14M | -$50M | $4M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $106M | $51M | $20M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $175M | $120M | $926,000 | $24M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.19x | -39.17x | -1.52x | -18.89x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,290 for IAUX. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs IAUX's +142.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 80.8% vs IAUX's -15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +12.5% | +25.1% | +24.9% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +142.2% | +193.4% | +198.5% | +418.7% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | +144.0% | +163.5% | +490.7% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | +61.1% | +79.8% | +35.7% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.4% | +182.7% | -0.1% | -5.1% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.5% | +34.6% | +38.1% | +80.8% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IAUX and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAUX is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 1.71x | 1.27x | 2.31x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.24 | $15.15 | $29.70 | $10.50 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $3.14 | $6.88 | $1.06 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.5% | +67.0% | +78.7% | +60.8% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 47.6 | 51.0 | 56.3 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17.1M | 9.4M | 992K | 5.8M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IAUX as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", MUX as "Buy", USAS as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.8% upside for USAS (target: $10) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.75 | $30.00 | $9.75 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.04 | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
HL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). USAS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
IAUX vs EXK vs MUX vs USAS vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, i-80 Gold Corp.
(IAUX) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). Hecla Mining Company (HL) offers the better valuation at 36. 9x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL?
On trailing P/E, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the cheapest at 36.
9x versus McEwen Mining Inc. at 39. 6x. On forward P/E, Endeavour Silver Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to -27. 1% for i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus IAUX's -28. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), i-80 Gold Corp.
(IAUX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately 172% more volatile than IAUX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 50% for i-80 Gold Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), i-80 Gold Corp.
(IAUX) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IAUX leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL?
Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
6% net margin versus -195. 9% for i-80 Gold Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -98. 7% for IAUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp.
(EXK) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAS: 52. 8% to $9. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL?
In this comparison, MUX (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. IAUX, EXK, USAS, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IAUX or EXK or MUX or USAS or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, i-80 Gold Corp.
(IAUX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85)). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IAUX: -28. 4%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IAUX and EXK and MUX and USAS and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IAUX is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.