Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Limited

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-29.9%
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.10B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
WVVI
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-16.8%

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IBG logoIBG
SAM logoSAM
TAP logoTAP
WVVI logoWVVI
IndustryBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Market Cap$1M$2.18B$8.10B$14M
Revenue (TTM)$8M$2.09B$11.19B$37M
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-61M$-2.11B$-1M
Gross Margin11.3%45.2%37.8%60.5%
Operating Margin-71.3%-3.8%-20.3%-2.4%
Forward P/E20.6x9.2x
Total Debt$184K$38M$6.30B$15.52B
Cash & Equiv.$620K$223M$897M$411M

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IBG
SAM
TAP
WVVI
StockSep 24May 26Return
Innovation Beverage… (IBG)1001.7-98.3%
The Boston Beer Com… (SAM)10070.1-29.9%
Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP)10075.0-25.0%
Willamette Valley V… (WVVI)10083.2-16.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SAM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. TAP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Limited
The Secondary Option

IBG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
The Growth Play

SAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
  • 3.7% revenue growth vs WVVI's -100.0%
  • -2.9% margin vs IBG's -80.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
The Long-Run Compounder

TAP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -41.4% 10Y total return vs SAM's 32.0%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding
WVVI
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.
The Income Pick

WVVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -0.25, yield 100.0%
  • Beta -0.25, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.70x
  • 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • -1.1% ROA vs IBG's -124.5%, ROIC -2.6% vs -87.3%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAM logoSAM3.7% revenue growth vs WVVI's -100.0%
ValueTAP logoTAPBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSAM logoSAM-2.9% margin vs IBG's -80.0%
Stability / SafetySAM logoSAMBeta 0.29 vs IBG's 1.13, lower leverage
DividendsWVVI logoWVVI100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SAM logoSAM-15.9% vs IBG's -95.8%
Efficiency (ROA)WVVI logoWVVI-1.1% ROA vs IBG's -124.5%, ROIC -2.6% vs -87.3%

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSAMLAGGINGWVVI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

TAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.2B annually — 1457.1x IBG's $8M. SAM is the more profitable business, keeping -2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBG's -80.0%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8M$2.1B$11.2B$37M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$14M-$1.5B$2M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M-$61M-$2.1B-$1M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$191M$1.2B-$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.3%+45.2%+37.8%+60.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-71.3%-3.8%-20.3%-2.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-80.0%-2.9%-18.9%-3.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-37.0%+9.1%+10.4%-8.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.6%+1.7%+2.0%-10.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.3%-7.4%+35.6%-94.1%
Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
Market CapShares × price$1M$2.2B$8.1B$14M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$966,549$2.0B$13.5B$15.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.54x20.50x-3.98x-4.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.56x9.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.48x1.04x0.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.54x2.54x0.80x0.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.09x7.58x
Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SAM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

WVVI delivers a -1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-10 for IBG. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TAP's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAM scores 7/9 vs WVVI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-10.1%-7.3%-18.6%-1.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-124.5%-5.0%-8.9%-1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-87.3%+15.5%-10.1%-2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-155.2%+14.8%-11.6%-3.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93741
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.04x0.60x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$435,590-$186M$5.4B$15.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$619,944$223M$897M$411M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$184,354$38M$6.3B$15.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.53x-9.99x-0.69x
SAM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SAM and TAP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TAP five years ago would be worth $8,585 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $116 for IBG. Over the past 12 months, SAM leads with a -15.9% total return vs IBG's -95.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAP at -9.1% vs IBG's -77.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-91.1%+1.5%-8.0%-8.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-95.8%-15.9%-20.8%-49.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-35.0%-24.8%-51.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-81.8%-14.1%-80.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%+32.0%-41.4%-59.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-77.4%-13.4%-9.1%-21.2%
Evenly matched — SAM and TAP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SAM and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WVVI is the less volatile stock with a -0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IBG's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAM currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs IBG's 2.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x0.29x-0.01x-0.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.50$264.46$57.57$7.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.84$185.34$40.64$2.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.3%+76.7%+74.9%+40.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.828.747.253.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded790K199K2.9M3K
Evenly matched — SAM and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SAM as "Hold", TAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for SAM (target: $247) vs 12.0% for TAP (target: $48). For income investors, WVVI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs TAP's 4.46%.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$246.86$48.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts3137
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.5%+100.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises054
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.92$194.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.4%+8.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SAM leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallThe Boston Beer Company, In… (SAM)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (WVVI). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI?

On forward P/E, Molson Coors Beverage Company is actually cheaper at 9.

2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI?

Over the past 5 years, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) delivered a total return of -14.

1%, compared to -98. 8% for Innovation Beverage Group Limited (IBG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +32. 0% versus IBG's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

(WVVI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 25β versus Innovation Beverage Group Limited's 1. 13β — meaning IBG is approximately -551% more volatile than WVVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 60% for Molson Coors Beverage Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -100. 0% for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (WVVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAP leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI?

The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 2% net margin versus -87. 7% for Innovation Beverage Group Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAM leads at 6. 9% versus -88. 2% for IBG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WVVI leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) trades at 9.

2x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAM: 21. 7% to $246. 86.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI?

In this comparison, WVVI (100.

0% yield), TAP (4. 5% yield) pay a dividend. IBG, SAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

(WVVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 25), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WVVI: -59. 3%, IBG: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IBG and SAM and TAP and WVVI?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IBG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WVVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. TAP, WVVI pay a dividend while IBG, SAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IBG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TAP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WVVI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 36%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IBG and SAM and TAP and WVVI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IBG: -38.6% · SAM: 1.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.