Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) vs ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GTM | 2.9% revenue growth vs IBTA's -6.8% |
| Value | GTM | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 208.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | GTM | 9.9% net margin vs IBTA's 4.7% |
| Stability / Safety | IBTA | Beta 0.88 vs GTM's 1.81, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | IBTA | -25.2% vs GTM's -46.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IBTA | 3.1% ROA vs GTM's 1.9%, ROIC -0.5% vs 5.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Ibotta operates a digital promotions platform that connects consumer packaged goods brands with shoppers through cash-back offers. It makes money primarily from performance-based marketing fees paid by brands—typically a percentage of sales driven through its network—with additional revenue from data analytics services. The company's moat lies in its extensive network of retail partners and proprietary shopper data, creating a two-sided marketplace that's difficult for competitors to replicate.
ZoomInfo is a go-to-market intelligence platform that provides comprehensive data on companies and professionals for sales, marketing, and recruiting teams. It generates revenue primarily through subscription-based access to its cloud platform—with tiered pricing for different organizational sizes—and additional fees for premium data and workflow tools. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive, continuously updated database of business contacts and buying signals—a network effect that becomes more valuable as more users contribute data.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GTM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). IBTA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GTM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 3.6x IBTA's $342M. GTM is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBTA's 4.7%. On growth, GTM holds the edge at +3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IBTAIbotta, Inc. | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $342M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $280M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $124M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $72M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.2% | +84.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +31.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.3% | +175.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, GTM trades at a 92% valuation discount to IBTA's 208.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTM's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IBTA's 210.5x.
| Metric | IBTAIbotta, Inc. | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $647M | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 208.08x | 15.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 210.47x | 11.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 1.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.77x | 4.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTM delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for IBTA. IBTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTM's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTM scores 7/9 vs IBTA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | IBTAIbotta, Inc. | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$161M | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $187M | $176M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.56x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in IBTA five years ago would be worth $2,419 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,101 for GTM. Over the past 12 months, IBTA leads with a -25.2% total return vs GTM's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTM at -36.4% vs IBTA's -37.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IBTAIbotta, Inc. | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | -35.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.2% | -46.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.8% | -74.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.8% | -89.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.7% | -81.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.7% | -36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
IBTA is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTM's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTM currently trades 49.6% from its 52-week high vs IBTA's 39.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IBTAIbotta, Inc. | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.74 | $12.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.10 | $5.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.8% | +49.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 34.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 236K | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IBTA as "Buy" and GTM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.6% upside for GTM (target: $9) vs 4.1% for IBTA (target: $26).
| Metric | IBTAIbotta, Inc. | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $9.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +21.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) | 100 | 20.63 | -79.4% |
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | 100 | 47.74 | -52.3% |
Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) returned -76% over 5 years vs ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM)'s -89%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) | $211M | $342M | +62.5% |
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | $144M | $1.2B | +765.9% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s revenue grew from $144M (2018) to $1.2B (2025) — a 36.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) | -26.0% | 4.7% | +118.1% |
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | -19.8% | 9.9% | +150.2% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s net margin went from -20% (2018) to 10% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | 214 | 26.1 | -87.8% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. has traded in a 26x–214x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) | -1.81 | 0.12 | +106.6% |
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | -0.2 | 0.39 | +295.0% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.20 (2018) to $0.39 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Ibotta, Inc. generated $75M FCF in 2025 (+216% vs 2022). ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. generated $389M FCF in 2025 (+41% vs 2021).
IBTA vs GTM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IBTA or GTM a better buy right now?
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) offers the better valuation at 15.9x trailing P/E (5.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IBTA or GTM?
On trailing P/E, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) is the cheapest at 15.9x versus Ibotta, Inc. at 208.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IBTA or GTM?
Over the past 5 years, Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) delivered a total return of -75.8%, compared to -89.0% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM). A $10,000 investment in IBTA five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBTA returned -75.7% versus GTM's -81.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IBTA or GTM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.88β versus ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s 1.81β — meaning GTM is approximately 107% more volatile than IBTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 120% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — IBTA or GTM?
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) is the more profitable company, earning 9.9% net margin versus 4.7% for Ibotta, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTM leads at 18.1% versus -0.2% for IBTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTM leads at 82.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IBTA or GTM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTM: 49.6% to $9.29.
07Which pays a better dividend — IBTA or GTM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IBTA or GTM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ibotta, Inc. (IBTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.88)). ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) carries a higher beta of 1.81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBTA: -75.7%, GTM: -81.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IBTA and GTM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: IBTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTM is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.