Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ICL vs SMG vs MOS vs NTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
Agricultural Inputs
Agricultural Inputs
ICL vs SMG vs MOS vs NTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $7.74B | $3.62B | $7.27B | $32.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.05B | $3.35B | $11.68B | $26.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $369M | $90M | $1.22B | $2.27B |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 31.0% | 16.5% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 11.7% | 9.9% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 14.2x | 15.7x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.76B | $2.38B | $760M | $12.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $291M | $37M | $277M | $700M |
ICL vs SMG vs MOS vs NTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICL Group Ltd (ICL) | 100 | 173.4 | +73.4% |
| The Scotts Miracle-… (SMG) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| The Mosaic Company (MOS) | 100 | 189.5 | +89.5% |
| Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) | 100 | 201.1 | +101.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICL vs SMG vs MOS vs NTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 98.7% 10Y total return vs NTR's 54.0%
- PEG 0.27 vs MOS's 0.91
- Lower P/E (15.6x vs 15.7x), PEG 0.27 vs 0.91
SMG is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.2% yield, vs NTR's 3.2%
MOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.52, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.32x
- 10.5% margin vs SMG's 2.7%
NTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 248.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.3%
- 5.3% revenue growth vs SMG's -3.9%
- +24.6% vs MOS's -24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs SMG's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 15.7x), PEG 0.27 vs 0.91 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.5% margin vs SMG's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs SMG's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs NTR's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.6% vs MOS's -24.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs SMG's 2.9%, ROIC 6.1% vs 13.3% |
ICL vs SMG vs MOS vs NTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ICL vs SMG vs MOS vs NTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MOS leads 2 • ICL leads 0 • SMG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.9B annually — 8.0x SMG's $3.4B. MOS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMG's 2.7%. On growth, NTR holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.1B | $3.4B | $11.7B | $26.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $466M | $2.2B | $6.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $369M | $90M | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $317M | $358M | -$535M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +31.0% | +16.5% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +11.7% | +9.9% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +2.7% | +10.5% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +10.7% | -4.6% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | -15.0% | -7.5% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | -78.5% | +3.8% | +4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MOS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, MOS trades at a 82% valuation discount to ICL's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MOS offers better value at 0.34x vs ICL's 0.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.7B | $3.6B | $7.3B | $32.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.2B | $6.0B | $7.8B | $45.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.33x | 25.25x | 5.90x | 14.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.59x | 14.23x | 15.68x | 12.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.58x | — | 0.34x | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.75x | 13.75x | 3.59x | 7.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 1.06x | 0.62x | 1.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | — | 0.55x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.57x | 13.22x | — | 16.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for ICL. MOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTR scores 8/9 vs ICL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | — | +10.0% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +2.9% | +5.0% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +13.3% | +6.1% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +17.4% | +5.9% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — | 0.06x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $2.3B | $483M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $291M | $37M | $277M | $700M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $2.4B | $760M | $12.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.71x | 3.08x | 8.81x | 5.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTR five years ago would be worth $12,815 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,094 for SMG. Over the past 12 months, NTR leads with a +24.6% total return vs MOS's -24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTR at 5.1% vs MOS's -12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.4% | +6.1% | -7.6% | +9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.8% | +20.7% | -24.6% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | -3.2% | -32.7% | +16.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.6% | -69.1% | -27.9% | +28.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.7% | +34.9% | +14.9% | +54.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.4% | -1.1% | -12.4% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMG and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMG's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMG currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs MOS's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.10x | 0.52x | -0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.35 | $72.35 | $38.23 | $85.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.76 | $52.00 | $22.74 | $53.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.6% | +86.2% | +59.9% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 48.9 | 42.7 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 938K | 9.5M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMG and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ICL as "Hold", SMG as "Buy", MOS as "Hold", NTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.4% upside for MOS (target: $31) vs 2.5% for ICL (target: $6). For income investors, SMG offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs ICL's 2.89%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.15 | $72.00 | $31.25 | $84.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 17 | 49 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +4.2% | +4.2% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $2.63 | $0.95 | $2.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +1.7% |
NTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MOS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ICL vs SMG vs MOS vs NTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR?
On trailing P/E, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the cheapest at 5.
9x versus ICL Group Ltd at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Nutrien Ltd. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ICL Group Ltd wins at 0. 27x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR?
Over the past 5 years, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) delivered a total return of +28. 1%, compared to -69. 1% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICL returned +98. 7% versus MOS's +14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's 1. 10β — meaning SMG is approximately -1618% more volatile than NTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 51% for Nutrien Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -3. 9% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for ICL Group Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMG leads at -4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR?
The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 3. 2% for ICL Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTR leads at 14. 5% versus 9. 8% for ICL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTR leads at 31. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for The Mosaic Company — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 36. 4% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 9% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL).
09Is ICL or SMG or MOS or NTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutrien Ltd.
(NTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTR: +54. 0%, SMG: +34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICL and SMG and MOS and NTR?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.