Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ICMB vs TPVG vs HTGC vs GAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
ICMB vs TPVG vs HTGC vs GAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $24M | $243M | $3.07B | $657M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $97M | $547M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-12M | $289M | $130M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 83.5% | 87.2% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 65.0% | 77.9% | 66.7% | 72.7% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 6.5x | 8.4x | 40.7x |
| Total Debt | $122M | $469M | $2.30B | $456M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $771K | $20M | $57M | $14M |
ICMB vs TPVG vs HTGC vs GAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investcorp Credit M… (ICMB) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 147.2 | +47.2% |
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICMB vs TPVG vs HTGC vs GAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 14.3%
- Beta 0.26, yield 14.3%, current ratio 2.05x
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 40.7x)
- Beta 0.26 vs TPVG's 0.83
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ICMB's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
- 17.1% yield, vs GAIN's 10.0%
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 9.1% vs GAIN's 5.5%
GAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 319.3% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 171.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 91.3%, current ratio 3.69x
- +30.8% vs ICMB's -26.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 40.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ICMB's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs TPVG's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield, vs GAIN's 10.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.8% vs ICMB's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ICMB's 0.3% |
ICMB vs TPVG vs HTGC vs GAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GAIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICMB leads 1 • TPVG leads 1 • HTGC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $547M annually — 23.5x ICMB's $23M. GAIN is the more profitable business, keeping 72.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPVG's 50.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $97M | $547M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | -$22M | $381M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$12M | $289M | $130M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $35M | -$352M | -$82M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +83.5% | +87.2% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +77.9% | +66.7% | +72.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.0% | +50.6% | +62.1% | +72.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -58.2% | -58.7% | -77.8% | +126.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.4% | -2.3% | -20.7% | +58.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ICMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, ICMB trades at a 79% valuation discount to GAIN's 9.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TPVG's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GAIN's 16.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $243M | $3.1B | $657M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $145M | $691M | $5.3B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.99x | 4.91x | 8.86x | 9.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 8.41x | 40.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x | 14.54x | 16.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 2.50x | 5.61x | 7.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 0.68x | 1.44x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 5.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TPVG and GAIN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. GAIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICMB's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs ICMB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | -3.4% | +13.2% | +21.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | -1.5% | +6.4% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +7.2% | +6.6% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +9.4% | +8.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | 1.33x | 1.04x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $121M | $449M | $2.2B | $441M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $771,483 | $20M | $57M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122M | $469M | $2.3B | $456M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.10x | -1.02x | 4.34x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $17,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,538 for ICMB. Over the past 12 months, GAIN leads with a +30.8% total return vs ICMB's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTGC at 17.9% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.9% | -6.3% | -10.6% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.6% | +19.3% | +6.6% | +30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | -3.4% | +63.9% | +56.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.6% | -13.5% | +46.8% | +72.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.5% | +93.3% | +171.6% | +319.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.5% | -1.2% | +17.9% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICMB and GAIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs ICMB's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | 0.83x | 0.69x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.12 | $7.53 | $19.67 | $17.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.29 | $4.48 | $13.70 | $13.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.5% | +79.5% | +83.4% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 58.3 | 64.7 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 504K | 2.5M | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
TPVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy", GAIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -9.1% for GAIN (target: $15). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs HTGC's 8.64%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $18.92 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 31 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.3% | +17.1% | +8.6% | +10.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $1.02 | $1.42 | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
GAIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ICMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ICMB vs TPVG vs HTGC vs GAIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN?
On trailing P/E, Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
(ICMB) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Gladstone Investment Corporation at 9. 3x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +72.
0%, compared to -24. 6% for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +319. 3% versus ICMB's +9. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
(ICMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 217% more volatile than ICMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 157% for Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to -27. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN?
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 72.
7% net margin versus 50. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 65. 0% for ICMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICMB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 7x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 8. 6% for Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC).
09Is ICMB or TPVG or HTGC or GAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
(ICMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26), 14. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICMB: +9. 5%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICMB and TPVG and HTGC and GAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.