Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ICON vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ICON
Icon Energy Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+61.0%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+24.2%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.38B
5Y Perf.+10.4%

ICON vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ICON logoICON
INSW logoINSW
TNK logoTNK
STNG logoSTNG
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2M$4.46B$2.83B$4.38B
Revenue (TTM)$6M$676M$952M$1.04B
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$546M$351M$502M
Gross Margin-0.7%40.6%27.5%51.8%
Operating Margin-32.2%44.4%27.5%38.8%
Forward P/E8.5x6.0x8.6x
Total Debt$16M$576M$55M$619M
Cash & Equiv.$946K$117M$831M$752M

ICON vs INSW vs TNK vs STNGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ICON
INSW
TNK
STNG
StockJul 24May 26Return
Icon Energy Corp. (ICON)1000.9-99.1%
International Seawa… (INSW)100161.0+61.0%
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100124.2+24.2%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100110.4+10.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ICON vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSW leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Icon Energy Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. TNK and STNG also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ICON
Icon Energy Corp.
The Income Pick

ICON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 15.5%
  • 18.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
  • 15.5% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Best for: income & stability
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Growth Play

INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
  • 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
  • 80.8% margin vs ICON's -79.7%
  • +160.2% vs ICON's -14.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Value Pick

TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs STNG's 0.26
  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
Best for: valuation efficiency
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.28 vs ICON's 0.50, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthICON logoICON18.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW80.8% margin vs ICON's -79.7%
Stability / SafetySTNG logoSTNGBeta 0.28 vs ICON's 0.50, lower leverage
DividendsICON logoICON15.5% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+160.2% vs ICON's -14.9%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW20.1% ROA vs ICON's -8.3%, ROIC 9.4% vs 0.8%

ICON vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ICONIcon Energy Corp.
FY 2020
Wholesale License
71.1%$76M
Direct To Retail License
28.9%$31M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
59.3%$1.1B
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.4%$547M
Other revenue
7.6%$136M
Time-charter
1.4%$26M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.7%$13M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
0.6%$11M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ICON vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGSTNG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 169.0x ICON's $6M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICON's -79.7%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$676M$952M$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$492,000$465M$348M$580M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M$546M$351M$502M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M$193M$113M$389M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-0.7%+40.6%+27.5%+51.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-32.2%+44.4%+27.5%+38.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-79.7%+80.8%+36.9%+48.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.9%+28.5%+11.8%+37.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-91.3%-26.4%+46.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.8%+46.0%+2.5%
Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ICON and TNK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 44% valuation discount to INSW's 14.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.26x vs STNG's 0.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Market CapShares × price$2M$4.5B$2.8B$4.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17M$4.9B$2.1B$4.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.35x14.48x8.05x12.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.52x6.00x8.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x0.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.12x10.48x6.80x8.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.29x5.29x2.97x4.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.13x2.21x1.38x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF117.08x25.09x8.92x
Evenly matched — ICON and TNK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — INSW and TNK each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-24 for ICON. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICON's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.9%+27.1%+17.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.3%+20.1%+15.7%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.8%+9.4%+12.5%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.0%+12.1%+10.9%+8.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94646
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.36x0.29x0.03x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$15M$459M-$776M-$133M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$946,000$117M$831M$752M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$16M$576M$55M$619M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.97x0.90x109.95x6.82x
Evenly matched — INSW and TNK each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,257 for ICON. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs ICON's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs ICON's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+91.4%+96.5%+58.3%+71.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.9%+160.2%+80.3%+115.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%+179.7%+136.5%+92.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%+438.1%+513.8%+359.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%+1014.5%+187.7%+62.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-49.9%+40.9%+33.2%+24.4%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICON's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs ICON's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x0.43x0.35x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.23$91.58$83.54$87.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.55$35.60$41.05$37.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+29.6%+98.5%+97.3%+96.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.767.357.960.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded277K597K542K1.2M
Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ICON and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: INSW as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, ICON offers the higher dividend yield at 15.54% vs STNG's 1.99%.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$83.33$90.00$85.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts132331
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+15.5%+3.2%+2.4%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.19$2.92$1.98$1.69
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0%
Evenly matched — ICON and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

INSW leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ICON vs INSW vs TNK vs STNG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Icon Energy Corp.

(ICON) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to -87. 4% for Icon Energy Corp. (ICON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus ICON's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Icon Energy Corp. 's 0. 50β — meaning ICON is approximately 78% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 136% for Icon Energy Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Icon Energy Corp.

(ICON) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -118. 1% for Icon Energy Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSW leads at -0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG?

Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus -4. 0% for Icon Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 3. 2% for ICON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Icon Energy Corp. (ICON) offers the highest yield at 15. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

09

Is ICON or INSW or TNK or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, ICON: -87. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ICON and INSW and TNK and STNG?

These companies operate in different sectors (ICON (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and TNK (Energy) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ICON is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ICON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 6.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSW

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 48%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TNK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STNG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 23%
  • Net Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ICON and INSW and TNK and STNG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ICON: 18.6% · INSW: -91.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.