Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ICON vs TRMD vs TNK vs INSW vs DHT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
ICON vs TRMD vs TNK vs INSW vs DHT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2M | $3.36B | $2.83B | $4.46B | $3.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $1.29B | $952M | $676M | $566M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $277M | $351M | $546M | $331M |
| Gross Margin | -0.7% | 47.2% | 27.5% | 40.6% | 47.5% |
| Operating Margin | -32.2% | 26.6% | 27.5% | 44.4% | 50.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.6x | 6.0x | 8.5x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $1.23B | $55M | $576M | $429M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $946K | $272M | $831M | $117M | $79M |
ICON vs TRMD vs TNK vs INSW vs DHT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icon Energy Corp. (ICON) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 124.2 | +24.2% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 161.0 | +61.0% |
| DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICON vs TRMD vs TNK vs INSW vs DHT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 15.5%
- 18.6% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
TRMD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth -15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.0%
- 16.6% yield, vs INSW's 3.2%
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- PEG 0.19 vs TRMD's 0.29
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.0x)
INSW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TRMD's 5.9%
- 80.8% margin vs ICON's -79.7%
- +160.2% vs ICON's -14.9%
DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.27, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.80x
- Beta 0.27 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
- 21.3% ROA vs ICON's -8.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs ICON's -79.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.6% yield, vs INSW's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs ICON's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.3% ROA vs ICON's -8.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 0.8% |
ICON vs TRMD vs TNK vs INSW vs DHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ICON vs TRMD vs TNK vs INSW vs DHT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INSW leads in 1 of 6 categories
TRMD leads 1 • ICON leads 0 • TNK leads 0 • DHT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — INSW and DHT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 210.7x ICON's $6M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICON's -79.7%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +57.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $1.3B | $952M | $676M | $566M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$492,000 | $555M | $348M | $465M | $388M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $277M | $351M | $546M | $331M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $242M | $113M | $193M | -$131M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +47.2% | +27.5% | +40.6% | +47.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.2% | +26.6% | +27.5% | +44.4% | +50.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.7% | +21.4% | +36.9% | +80.8% | +58.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +18.7% | +11.8% | +28.5% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.8% | -26.4% | -91.3% | +57.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -43.0% | +46.0% | +4.8% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ICON and TRMD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 64% valuation discount to DHT's 14.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMD offers better value at 0.23x vs TNK's 0.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $3.4B | $2.8B | $4.5B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $4.3B | $2.1B | $4.9B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.35x | 5.21x | 8.05x | 14.48x | 14.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.62x | 6.00x | 8.52x | 7.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.23x | 0.26x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.12x | 5.07x | 6.80x | 10.48x | 12.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 2.15x | 2.97x | 5.29x | 6.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | 1.54x | 1.38x | 2.21x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.38x | 25.09x | 117.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TNK and DHT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-24 for ICON. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICON's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.9% | +12.9% | +17.2% | +27.1% | +29.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.3% | +8.7% | +15.7% | +20.1% | +21.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +18.0% | +12.5% | +9.4% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | +22.8% | +10.9% | +12.1% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.36x | 0.59x | 0.03x | 0.29x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | $954M | -$776M | $459M | $350M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $946,000 | $272M | $831M | $117M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $1.2B | $55M | $576M | $429M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.97x | 4.61x | 109.95x | 0.90x | 25.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,257 for ICON. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs ICON's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs ICON's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +91.4% | +70.8% | +58.3% | +96.5% | +65.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.9% | +113.4% | +80.3% | +160.2% | +79.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | +57.3% | +136.5% | +179.7% | +167.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | +435.1% | +513.8% | +438.1% | +282.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | +585.5% | +187.7% | +1014.5% | +318.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.9% | +16.3% | +33.2% | +40.9% | +38.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSW and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs ICON's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.54x | 0.35x | 0.43x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.23 | $34.88 | $83.54 | $91.58 | $20.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.55 | $15.79 | $41.05 | $35.60 | $10.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.6% | +94.9% | +97.3% | +98.5% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.7 | 62.3 | 57.9 | 67.3 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 277K | 924K | 542K | 597K | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TRMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMD as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", DHT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs TNK's 2.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 | $90.00 | $83.33 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 23 | 13 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.5% | +16.6% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.19 | $5.48 | $1.98 | $2.92 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INSW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). TRMD leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
ICON vs TRMD vs TNK vs INSW vs DHT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Icon Energy Corp.
(ICON) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TORM plc (TRMD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus DHT Holdings, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to -87. 4% for Icon Energy Corp. (ICON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus ICON's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus TORM plc's 0. 54β — meaning TRMD is approximately 99% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 136% for Icon Energy Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Icon Energy Corp.
(ICON) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -118. 1% for Icon Energy Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRMD leads at 36. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT?
DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus -4. 0% for Icon Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 3. 2% for ICON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for International Seaways, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 6%, versus 2. 4% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is ICON or TRMD or TNK or INSW or DHT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, ICON: -87. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICON and TRMD and TNK and INSW and DHT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ICON (Industrials) and TRMD (Energy) and TNK (Energy) and INSW (Energy) and DHT (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ICON is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.