Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IDXX vs ZTS vs HSIC vs ELAN vs ANIP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Distribution
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
IDXX vs ZTS vs HSIC vs ELAN vs ANIP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Distribution | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $44.49B | $34.96B | $8.13B | $11.81B | $1.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.45B | $9.51B | $13.18B | $4.89B | $924M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.10B | $2.64B | $398M | $-242M | $90M |
| Gross Margin | 62.1% | 70.8% | 29.1% | 49.4% | 52.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.6% | 37.6% | 5.8% | 9.0% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 38.3x | 11.9x | 13.2x | 22.4x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $9.49B | $3.69B | $4.02B | $325M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $180M | $2.31B | $156M | $545M | $286M |
IDXX vs ZTS vs HSIC vs ELAN vs ANIP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
| Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) | 100 | 59.4 | -40.6% |
| Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) | 100 | 116.6 | +16.6% |
| Elanco Animal Healt… (ELAN) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| ANI Pharmaceuticals… (ANIP) | 100 | 263.6 | +163.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IDXX vs ZTS vs HSIC vs ELAN vs ANIP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IDXX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs ANIP's 80.2%
- 32.6% ROA vs ELAN's -1.8%, ROIC 42.5% vs 1.9%
ZTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 2.4%
- PEG 0.99 vs HSIC's 4.20
- Beta 0.88, yield 2.4%, current ratio 3.03x
- 27.8% margin vs ELAN's -4.9%
Among these 5 stocks, HSIC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ELAN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +92.6% vs ZTS's -47.5%
ANIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth 419.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 60.1%, current ratio 2.71x
- 43.8% revenue growth vs ZTS's 2.3%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 22.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs ZTS's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 22.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs ELAN's -4.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs ELAN's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ANIP's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.6% vs ZTS's -47.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs ELAN's -1.8%, ROIC 42.5% vs 1.9% |
IDXX vs ZTS vs HSIC vs ELAN vs ANIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IDXX vs ZTS vs HSIC vs ELAN vs ANIP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZTS leads in 2 of 6 categories
IDXX leads 1 • ELAN leads 1 • HSIC leads 0 • ANIP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.2B annually — 14.3x ANIP's $924M. ZTS is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELAN's -4.9%. On growth, ANIP holds the edge at +20.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $9.5B | $13.2B | $4.9B | $924M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $4.1B | $1.1B | $957M | $213M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $2.6B | $398M | -$242M | $90M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $845M | $2.1B | $561M | $315M | $172M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.1% | +70.8% | +29.1% | +49.4% | +52.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +37.6% | +5.8% | +9.0% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +27.8% | +3.0% | -4.9% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +22.5% | +4.3% | +6.4% | +18.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +1.9% | +7.7% | +14.9% | +20.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.6% | +0.7% | +14.9% | -15.4% | +85.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZTS and ELAN and ANIP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.8x trailing earnings, ZTS trades at a 68% valuation discount to IDXX's 42.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZTS offers better value at 1.15x vs HSIC's 6.87x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44.5B | $35.0B | $8.1B | $11.8B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45.4B | $42.1B | $11.7B | $15.3B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.82x | 13.76x | 21.66x | -50.32x | 24.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.29x | 11.90x | 13.25x | 22.43x | 9.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.00x | 1.15x | 6.87x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.95x | 10.32x | 10.90x | 16.40x | 11.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.34x | 3.69x | 0.62x | 2.51x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.15x | 11.04x | 1.80x | 1.79x | 3.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.23x | 15.31x | 14.18x | 41.59x | 10.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ELAN. ANIP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZTS's 2.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDXX scores 7/9 vs HSIC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +70.9% | +62.4% | +8.2% | -3.6% | +17.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +32.6% | +17.5% | +3.6% | -1.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +42.5% | +26.9% | +7.1% | +1.9% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +61.4% | +29.9% | +9.8% | +2.2% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 2.85x | 0.77x | 0.61x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $897M | $7.2B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $180M | $2.3B | $156M | $545M | $286M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $9.5B | $3.7B | $4.0B | $325M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 35.55x | 14.74x | 4.59x | 0.87x | 3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANIP five years ago would be worth $24,881 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,311 for ZTS. Over the past 12 months, ELAN leads with a +92.6% total return vs ZTS's -47.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELAN at 36.2% vs ZTS's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.4% | -33.4% | -7.8% | +5.0% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.3% | -47.5% | +2.8% | +92.6% | +14.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.4% | -52.2% | -11.3% | +152.7% | +92.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | -46.9% | -14.6% | -26.6% | +148.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +542.3% | +97.8% | +5.8% | -34.3% | +80.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.9% | -21.8% | -3.9% | +36.2% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELAN and ANIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANIP is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAN's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ELAN currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs ZTS's 48.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.88x | 0.72x | 1.46x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $769.98 | $172.23 | $89.29 | $27.72 | $99.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $485.41 | $81.10 | $61.95 | $11.83 | $56.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.7% | +48.1% | +79.3% | +85.3% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 15.2 | 34.3 | 53.8 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 535K | 4.0M | 1.2M | 4.7M | 348K |
Analyst Outlook
ZTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDXX as "Buy", ZTS as "Hold", HSIC as "Hold", ELAN as "Buy", ANIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for ZTS (target: $134) vs 18.4% for ELAN (target: $28). ZTS is the only dividend payer here at 2.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $747.50 | $133.57 | $85.43 | $28.00 | $124.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 30 | 32 | 20 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | — | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.00 | — | — | $0.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +9.3% | +10.5% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
ZTS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). IDXX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
IDXX vs ZTS vs HSIC vs ELAN vs ANIP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ANIP) is the stronger pick with 43. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP?
On trailing P/E, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the cheapest at 13. 8x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. at 42. 8x. On forward P/E, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Zoetis Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Henry Schein, Inc. 's 4. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP?
Over the past 5 years, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ANIP) delivered a total return of +148. 8%, compared to -46. 9% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +542. 3% versus ELAN's -34. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ANIP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Elanco Animal Health Incorporated's 1. 46β — meaning ELAN is approximately 160% more volatile than ANIP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ANIP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 3% for Zoetis Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ANIP) is pulling ahead at 43. 8% versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 419. 2% year-over-year, compared to -169. 1% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANIP leads at 40. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP?
Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -4. 9% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTS leads at 38. 0% versus 5. 3% for ELAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZTS leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Henry Schein, Inc. 's 4. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ANIP) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 38. 3x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 29. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZTS: 61. 3% to $133. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP?
In this comparison, ZTS (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. IDXX, HSIC, ELAN, ANIP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IDXX or ZTS or HSIC or ELAN or ANIP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZTS: +97. 8%, ELAN: -34. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IDXX and ZTS and HSIC and ELAN and ANIP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZTS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HSIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ELAN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ANIP is a small-cap high-growth stock. ZTS pays a dividend while IDXX, HSIC, ELAN, ANIP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.