Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IFBD vs AIXI vs CLPS vs NICE vs FIVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IFBD
Infobird Co., Ltd

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-19.1%
NICE
NICE Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.-58.2%
FIVN
Five9, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.70B
5Y Perf.-69.3%

IFBD vs AIXI vs CLPS vs NICE vs FIVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IFBD logoIFBD
AIXI logoAIXI
CLPS logoCLPS
NICE logoNICE
FIVN logoFIVN
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$5M$8M$25M$5.78B$1.70B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$115M$299M$2.95B$1.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-53M$-4M$612M$57M
Gross Margin39.3%64.3%22.8%66.4%55.1%
Operating Margin-99.4%-44.2%-1.4%21.9%4.7%
Forward P/E8.7x7.0x
Total Debt$505K$46M$34M$164M$847M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$847K$28M$379M$232M

IFBD vs AIXI vs CLPS vs NICE vs FIVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IFBD
AIXI
CLPS
NICE
FIVN
StockMar 23May 26Return
Infobird Co., Ltd (IFBD)1000.2-99.8%
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI)1001.2-98.8%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10080.9-19.1%
NICE Ltd. (NICE)10041.8-58.2%
Five9, Inc. (FIVN)10030.7-69.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IFBD vs AIXI vs CLPS vs NICE vs FIVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLPS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. NICE Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. IFBD and FIVN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IFBD
Infobird Co., Ltd
The Growth Play

IFBD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 413.5%, EPS growth 84.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -47.0%
  • 413.5% revenue growth vs NICE's 7.7%
Best for: growth exposure
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AIXI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.27 vs FIVN's 1.79, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NICE
NICE Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

NICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 50.7% 10Y total return vs FIVN's 125.4%
  • 20.8% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
  • 11.8% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 13.2% vs -34.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIVN
Five9, Inc.
The Value Play

FIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIFBD logoIFBD413.5% revenue growth vs NICE's 7.7%
ValueFIVN logoFIVNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNICE logoNICE20.8% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs FIVN's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLPS logoCLPS-5.4% vs AIXI's -79.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NICE logoNICE11.8% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 13.2% vs -34.4%

IFBD vs AIXI vs CLPS vs NICE vs FIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IFBDInfobird Co., Ltd
FY 2022
Standard Cloud Based Services
38.2%$2M
B P O Services
36.4%$2M
Business Integration Services
24.1%$1M
Other Revenues
1.4%$77,663
AIXIXiao-I Corporation
FY 2024
Technology Service
94.5%$24M
Hardware Products Member
5.5%$1M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
NICENICE Ltd.
FY 2025
Cloud
76.0%$2.2B
Service
19.0%$560M
Product
5.0%$147M
FIVNFive9, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.1B

IFBD vs AIXI vs CLPS vs NICE vs FIVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNICELAGGINGFIVN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 570.7x IFBD's $5M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, IFBD holds the edge at +171.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIFBD logoIFBDInfobird Co., LtdAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationCLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationNICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$115M$299M$2.9B$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M-$49M-$1M$845M$140M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$53M-$4M$612M$57M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$2M$0$665M$206M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.3%+64.3%+22.8%+66.4%+55.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-99.4%-44.2%-1.4%+21.9%+4.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-32.7%-45.9%-1.3%+20.8%+4.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-70.6%-2.0%-2.3%+22.6%+17.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+171.2%-64.9%+15.3%+9.0%+9.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.7%-29.9%+75.8%+56.5%+20.0%
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NICE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIVN's 48.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIVN's 16.8x.

MetricIFBD logoIFBDInfobird Co., LtdAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationCLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationNICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5M$8M$25M$5.8B$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$994,534$53M$31M$5.6B$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.90x-0.45x-3.48x9.89x48.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.74x6.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.59x16.84x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.60x0.11x0.15x1.96x1.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x0.43x1.56x2.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.22x8.45x
NICE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CLPS. IFBD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVN's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIFBD logoIFBDInfobird Co., LtdAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationCLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationNICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.5%-6.1%+16.4%+7.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.3%-65.3%-3.2%+11.8%+3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.2%-34.4%-7.9%+13.2%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.7%-3.4%-9.8%+16.1%+2.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934278
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.59x0.04x1.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M$45M$6M-$216M$615M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$846,593$28M$379M$232M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$505,225$46M$34M$164M$847M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.95x-14.13x7.94x
NICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NICE five years ago would be worth $4,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for IFBD. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs IFBD's -84.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIFBD logoIFBDInfobird Co., LtdAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationCLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationNICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.9%+68.1%-10.3%-14.6%+18.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-15.2%-79.2%-5.4%-40.4%-11.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-98.6%+0.5%-49.3%-61.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-98.6%-69.3%-59.1%-87.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-98.6%-78.5%+50.7%+125.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-84.3%-75.9%+0.2%-20.2%-27.2%
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IFBD and FIVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IFBD is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVN's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIVN currently trades 73.1% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIFBD logoIFBDInfobird Co., LtdAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationCLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationNICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.09x0.94x0.27x0.72x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.69$4.02$1.88$180.61$30.38
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.66$0.08$0.80$94.89$13.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+56.2%+18.0%+48.2%+53.0%+73.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.749.349.840.968.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3K60.6M15K631K2.8M
Evenly matched — IFBD and FIVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NICE as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for NICE (target: $151) vs 27.9% for FIVN (target: $28). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIFBD logoIFBDInfobird Co., LtdAIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationCLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationNICE logoNICENICE Ltd.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$150.88$28.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts2341
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+8.5%+2.9%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NICE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLPS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallNICE Ltd. (NICE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IFBD vs AIXI vs CLPS vs NICE vs FIVN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Infobird Co.

, Ltd (IFBD) is the stronger pick with 413. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for NICE Ltd. (NICE). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NICE Ltd. (NICE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN?

On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Five9, Inc. at 48. 3x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN?

Over the past 5 years, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) delivered a total return of -59. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Infobird Co. , Ltd (IFBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVN returned +125. 4% versus IFBD's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Infobird Co.

, Ltd (IFBD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus Five9, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FIVN is approximately -2158% more volatile than IFBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Infobird Co. , Ltd (IFBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 108% for Five9, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Infobird Co.

, Ltd (IFBD) is pulling ahead at 413. 5% versus 7. 7% for NICE Ltd. (NICE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN?

NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -146. 0% for Infobird Co. , Ltd — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -120. 6% for IFBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 7x for NICE Ltd. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NICE: 57. 8% to $150. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. IFBD, AIXI, NICE, FIVN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IFBD or AIXI or CLPS or NICE or FIVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). Five9, Inc. (FIVN) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, FIVN: +125. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IFBD and AIXI and CLPS and NICE and FIVN?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IFBD is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while IFBD, AIXI, NICE, FIVN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IFBD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8558%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AIXI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IFBD and AIXI and CLPS and NICE and FIVN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IFBD: 17118.0% · AIXI: -64.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.