IHG vs HLT vs MAR vs H

For growth investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger pick with 117.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E (26. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is the cheapest at 30.

7x versus Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. at 51. 8x. On forward P/E, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC is actually cheaper at 26. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

(HLT) delivered a total return of +162. 5%, compared to +115. 1% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLT returned +608. 0% versus H's +249. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

(HLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Hyatt Hotels Corporation's 1. 39β — meaning H is approximately 49% more volatile than HLT relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is pulling ahead at 117.

0% versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InterContinental Hotels Group PLC grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -104. 3% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, H leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

6% net margin versus -0. 7% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IHG leads at 23. 1% versus 7. 8% for H. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLT leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) trades at 26.

4x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — 23. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for H: 13. 5% to $190. 30.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 2% for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

96), 1. 2% yield, +281. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IHG: +281. 7%, H: +249. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IHG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HLT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; H is a mid-cap high-growth stock. IHG, MAR pay a dividend while HLT, H do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.