REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IIPR vs COLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
IIPR vs COLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $1.65B | $3.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $263M | $2.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $-115M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 46.7% | 0.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $394M | $4.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $137M |
IIPR vs COLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| Americold Realty Tr… (COLD) | 100 | 35.6 | -64.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IIPR vs COLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 13.2%
- 442.0% 10Y total return vs COLD's 10.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.3%, current ratio 0.15x
COLD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth -2.4%, EPS growth -21.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.7%
- Beta 0.81, current ratio 0.11x
- -2.4% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.4% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs COLD's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs IIPR's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 13.2% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.2% vs COLD's -25.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs COLD's -1.4%, ROIC 4.3% vs 0.1% |
IIPR vs COLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IIPR vs COLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 9.9x IIPR's $263M. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLD's -4.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $263M | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $197M | $375M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120M | -$115M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $144M | -$205M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.3% | +23.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | -7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | -138.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IIPR and COLD each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IIPR's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COLD's 21.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $8.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.68x | -31.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.42x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.92x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.06x | 21.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.20x | 1.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for COLD. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLD's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IIPR scores 4/9 vs COLD's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $346M | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $137M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.67x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IIPR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IIPR five years ago would be worth $5,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,533 for COLD. Over the past 12 months, IIPR leads with a +23.2% total return vs COLD's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IIPR at 5.0% vs COLD's -20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.5% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.2% | -25.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.7% | -49.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.2% | -54.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +442.0% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | -20.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IIPR and COLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIPR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs COLD's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.40 | $18.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.58 | $10.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 309K | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
IIPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IIPR as "Hold" and COLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.3% upside for COLD (target: $13) vs -23.7% for IIPR (target: $44). IIPR is the only dividend payer here at 13.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $13.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.62 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
IIPR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
IIPR vs COLD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IIPR or COLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Americold Realty Trust, Inc.
(COLD) is the stronger pick with -2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IIPR or COLD?
Over the past 5 years, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) delivered a total return of -48. 2%, compared to -54. 7% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +442. 0% versus COLD's +10. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IIPR or COLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Americold Realty Trust, Inc.
(COLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIPR is approximately 13% more volatile than COLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 154% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IIPR or COLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Americold Realty Trust, Inc.
(COLD) is pulling ahead at -2. 4% versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Americold Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS -21. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IIPR leads at -1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IIPR or COLD?
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus 0. 3% for COLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IIPR or COLD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COLD: 4.
3% to $13. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — IIPR or COLD?
In this comparison, IIPR (13.
2% yield) pays a dividend. COLD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IIPR or COLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 13. 2% yield, +442. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIPR: +442. 0%, COLD: +10. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IIPR and COLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IIPR pays a dividend while COLD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.