Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ILAG vs KOSS vs SMSI vs SONO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Software - Application
Consumer Electronics
ILAG vs KOSS vs SMSI vs SONO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Consumer Electronics | Software - Application | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $8M | $40M | $17M | $1.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $13M | $17M | $1.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-871K | $-28M | $-41M |
| Gross Margin | 8.7% | 36.4% | 75.5% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -170.2% | -15.8% | -154.8% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 47.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M | $2M | $60M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $646K | $3M | $1M | $175M |
ILAG vs KOSS vs SMSI vs SONO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent Living … (ILAG) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
| Smith Micro Softwar… (SMSI) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Sonos, Inc. (SONO) | 100 | 67.3 | -32.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ILAG vs KOSS vs SMSI vs SONO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ILAG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 42.3%, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 1.01, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 1.01 vs SONO's 1.75
- +9.7% vs SMSI's -19.8%
KOSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth 6.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.7%
- 91.0% 10Y total return vs SONO's -25.2%
- 2.9% revenue growth vs ILAG's -40.1%
- -2.3% ROA vs ILAG's -175.5%, ROIC -4.2% vs -133.0%
SMSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 4.4%
- 4.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
SONO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- -2.8% margin vs ILAG's -192.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9% revenue growth vs ILAG's -40.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.8% margin vs ILAG's -192.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs SONO's 1.75 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.7% vs SMSI's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs ILAG's -175.5%, ROIC -4.2% vs -133.0% |
ILAG vs KOSS vs SMSI vs SONO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ILAG vs KOSS vs SMSI vs SONO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
SONO leads 1 • KOSS leads 1 • ILAG leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SONO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SONO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 121.7x ILAG's $12M. SONO is the more profitable business, keeping -2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILAG's -192.0%. On growth, SONO holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $13M | $17M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$2M | -$21M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$871,116 | -$28M | -$41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$546,651 | -$10M | $118M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +36.4% | +75.5% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -170.2% | -15.8% | -154.8% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -192.0% | -6.8% | -165.4% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -46.8% | -4.3% | -61.3% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.9% | -19.6% | -8.7% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | — | +64.3% | -29.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SMSI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $40M | $17M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $39M | $18M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | -44.78x | -0.58x | -29.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 47.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 142.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.83x | 3.14x | 1.00x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 1.28x | 0.94x | 5.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 16.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KOSS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KOSS delivers a -2.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ILAG. KOSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILAG's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KOSS scores 5/9 vs ILAG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -2.8% | -141.9% | -10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -175.5% | -2.3% | -104.4% | -4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -133.0% | -4.2% | -48.3% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -183.5% | -4.9% | -62.8% | -9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.08x | 0.13x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$266,063 | $844,000 | -$115M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $645,939 | $3M | $1M | $175M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M | $2M | $60M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -276.36x | -1972.72x | -7.39x | 2587.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILAG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ILAG five years ago would be worth $6,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $207 for SMSI. Over the past 12 months, ILAG leads with a +971.1% total return vs SMSI's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILAG at 45.1% vs SMSI's -56.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.4% | -3.6% | +53.2% | -14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +971.1% | -10.6% | -19.8% | +66.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +205.4% | +5.3% | -91.9% | -31.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -75.7% | -97.9% | -60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | +91.0% | -96.5% | -25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.1% | +1.7% | -56.7% | -11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ILAG and SONO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILAG is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SONO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SONO currently trades 75.1% from its 52-week high vs KOSS's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.62x | 1.48x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.19 | $8.59 | $1.30 | $19.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $3.50 | $0.43 | $8.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.2% | +48.7% | +64.8% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 55.2 | 66.7 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 23K | 310K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SMSI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
SMSI is the only dividend payer here at 4.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% |
SMSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). SONO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ILAG vs KOSS vs SMSI vs SONO: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ILAG or KOSS or SMSI or SONO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Koss Corporation (KOSS) is the stronger pick with 2.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 1% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. (ILAG). Analysts rate Sonos, Inc. (SONO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ILAG or KOSS or SMSI or SONO?
Over the past 5 years, Intelligent Living Application Group Inc.
(ILAG) delivered a total return of -35. 2%, compared to -97. 9% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOSS returned +91. 0% versus SMSI's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ILAG or KOSS or SMSI or SONO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intelligent Living Application Group Inc.
(ILAG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Sonos, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning SONO is approximately 73% more volatile than ILAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Koss Corporation (KOSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 42% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ILAG or KOSS or SMSI or SONO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Koss Corporation (KOSS) is pulling ahead at 2.
9% versus -40. 1% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. (ILAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Smith Micro Software, Inc. grew EPS 62. 9% year-over-year, compared to -375. 0% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SONO leads at -6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ILAG or KOSS or SMSI or SONO?
Sonos, Inc.
(SONO) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 2% net margin versus -430. 6% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SONO leads at -3. 5% versus -368. 5% for ILAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMSI leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ILAG or KOSS or SMSI or SONO?
In this comparison, SMSI (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ILAG, KOSS, SONO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ILAG or KOSS or SMSI or SONO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smith Micro Software, Inc.
(SMSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 4% yield). Sonos, Inc. (SONO) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMSI: -96. 5%, SONO: -25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ILAG and KOSS and SMSI and SONO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ILAG (Industrials) and KOSS (Technology) and SMSI (Technology) and SONO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ILAG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMSI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SMSI pays a dividend while ILAG, KOSS, SONO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.