Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ILAG vs TUYA vs CEVA vs SMSI vs KOSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Consumer Electronics
ILAG vs TUYA vs CEVA vs SMSI vs KOSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $8M | $1.42B | $810M | $17M | $40M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $318M | $108M | $17M | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $29M | $-11M | $-28M | $-871K |
| Gross Margin | 8.7% | 47.7% | 87.2% | 75.5% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | -170.2% | -6.7% | -10.1% | -154.8% | -15.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.2x | 67.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $5M | $6M | $2M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $646K | $653M | $18M | $1M | $3M |
ILAG vs TUYA vs CEVA vs SMSI vs KOSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent Living … (ILAG) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Tuya Inc. (TUYA) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) | 100 | 90.6 | -9.4% |
| Smith Micro Softwar… (SMSI) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ILAG vs TUYA vs CEVA vs SMSI vs KOSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ILAG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 1.01 vs CEVA's 2.76
- +9.7% vs SMSI's -19.8%
TUYA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs ILAG's -40.1%
- Better valuation composite
- 9.1% margin vs ILAG's -192.0%
CEVA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 4.4%
- Beta 1.48, yield 4.4%, current ratio 0.74x
- 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TUYA's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
KOSS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 91.0% 10Y total return vs CEVA's 27.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 8.3%, current ratio 11.65x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs ILAG's -40.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs ILAG's -192.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs CEVA's 2.76 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TUYA's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.7% vs SMSI's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs ILAG's -175.5%, ROIC -8.5% vs -133.0% |
ILAG vs TUYA vs CEVA vs SMSI vs KOSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ILAG vs TUYA vs CEVA vs SMSI vs KOSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TUYA leads in 2 of 6 categories
ILAG leads 1 • SMSI leads 1 • CEVA leads 0 • KOSS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TUYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TUYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $318M annually — 26.5x ILAG's $12M. TUYA is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILAG's -192.0%. On growth, TUYA holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $318M | $108M | $17M | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$21M | -$7M | -$21M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $29M | -$11M | -$28M | -$871,116 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $0 | -$6M | -$10M | -$546,651 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +47.7% | +87.2% | +75.5% | +36.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -170.2% | -6.7% | -10.1% | -154.8% | -15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -192.0% | +9.1% | -10.5% | -165.4% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -46.8% | +25.5% | -6.0% | -61.3% | -4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.9% | +9.3% | +4.3% | -8.7% | -19.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | — | -2.0% | +64.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TUYA and SMSI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $1.4B | $810M | $17M | $40M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $770M | $797M | $18M | $39M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | 282.35x | -91.14x | -0.58x | -44.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.20x | 67.35x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.83x | 4.75x | 7.57x | 1.00x | 3.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 1.41x | 2.99x | 0.94x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.61x | 1569.47x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TUYA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TUYA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ILAG. TUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILAG's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TUYA scores 7/9 vs ILAG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +2.9% | -4.2% | -141.9% | -2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -175.5% | +2.6% | -3.7% | -104.4% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -133.0% | -8.5% | -2.3% | -48.3% | -4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -183.5% | -4.8% | -2.7% | -62.8% | -4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.00x | 0.02x | 0.13x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$649M | -$13M | $844,000 | -$266,063 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $645,939 | $653M | $18M | $1M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $5M | $6M | $2M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -276.36x | — | — | -7.39x | -1972.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILAG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ILAG five years ago would be worth $6,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $207 for SMSI. Over the past 12 months, ILAG leads with a +971.1% total return vs SMSI's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILAG at 45.1% vs SMSI's -56.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.4% | +12.4% | +50.4% | +53.2% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +971.1% | +9.8% | +59.5% | -19.8% | -10.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +205.4% | +23.2% | +31.6% | -91.9% | +5.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -84.9% | -35.4% | -97.9% | -75.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -89.5% | +27.2% | -96.5% | +91.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.1% | +7.2% | +9.6% | -56.7% | +1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ILAG and CEVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILAG is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CEVA's 2.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CEVA currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs KOSS's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.80x | 2.76x | 1.48x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.19 | $2.95 | $34.87 | $1.30 | $8.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $1.99 | $17.02 | $0.43 | $3.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.2% | +81.4% | +96.7% | +64.8% | +48.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 52.4 | 78.9 | 66.7 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 1.5M | 498K | 310K | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
SMSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TUYA as "Buy", CEVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.8% upside for TUYA (target: $4) vs -13.0% for CEVA (target: $29). For income investors, SMSI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.43% vs TUYA's 2.33%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.69 | $29.33 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 23 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% | — | +4.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 | — | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TUYA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ILAG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ILAG vs TUYA vs CEVA vs SMSI vs KOSS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 1% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. (ILAG). Tuya Inc. (TUYA) offers the better valuation at 282. 4x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tuya Inc. (TUYA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS?
On forward P/E, Tuya Inc.
is actually cheaper at 19. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS?
Over the past 5 years, Intelligent Living Application Group Inc.
(ILAG) delivered a total return of -35. 2%, compared to -97. 9% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOSS returned +91. 0% versus SMSI's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intelligent Living Application Group Inc.
(ILAG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus CEVA, Inc. 's 2. 76β — meaning CEVA is approximately 174% more volatile than ILAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tuya Inc. (TUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 42% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -40. 1% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. (ILAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tuya Inc. grew EPS 107. 7% year-over-year, compared to -375. 0% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TUYA leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS?
Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 7% net margin versus -430. 6% for Intelligent Living Application Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CEVA leads at -7. 1% versus -368. 5% for ILAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CEVA leads at 88. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) trades at 19. 2x forward P/E versus 67. 3x for CEVA, Inc. — 48. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TUYA: 53. 8% to $3. 69.
08Which pays a better dividend — ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS?
In this comparison, SMSI (4.
4% yield), TUYA (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ILAG, CEVA, KOSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ILAG or TUYA or CEVA or SMSI or KOSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smith Micro Software, Inc.
(SMSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 4% yield). CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) carries a higher beta of 2. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMSI: -96. 5%, CEVA: +27. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ILAG and TUYA and CEVA and SMSI and KOSS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ILAG (Industrials) and TUYA (Technology) and CEVA (Technology) and SMSI (Technology) and KOSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ILAG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TUYA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CEVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMSI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TUYA, SMSI pay a dividend while ILAG, CEVA, KOSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.