Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IMMR vs VRNS vs MSFT vs CYBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
IMMR vs VRNS vs MSFT vs CYBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $211M | $3.37B | $3.13T | $20.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $660M | $318.27B | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $66M | $-137M | $125.22B | $-147M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 78.1% | 68.3% | 74.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | -21.9% | 46.8% | -7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 242.2x | 25.3x | 81.9x |
| Total Debt | $322M | $572M | $112.18B | $1.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $202M | $30.24B | $623M |
IMMR vs VRNS vs MSFT vs CYBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immersion Corporati… (IMMR) | 100 | 96.0 | -4.0% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 102.0 | +2.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 100 | 415.1 | +315.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMMR vs VRNS vs MSFT vs CYBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 295.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 227.7%
- 35.4% revenue growth vs VRNS's 13.2%
- Lower P/E (15.5x vs 81.9x)
- 6.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
VRNS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs VRNS's -20.7%
CYBR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.9%
- +13.3% vs VRNS's -36.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.4% revenue growth vs VRNS's 13.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 81.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs VRNS's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs IMMR's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.3% vs VRNS's -36.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 24.9% vs -11.0% |
IMMR vs VRNS vs MSFT vs CYBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMMR vs VRNS vs MSFT vs CYBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
IMMR leads 1 • CYBR leads 1 • VRNS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 482.1x VRNS's $660M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRNS's -20.7%. On growth, IMMR holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $660M | $318.3B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $166M | -$135M | $192.6B | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $66M | -$137M | $125.2B | -$147M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$69M | $120M | $72.9B | $259M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +78.1% | +68.3% | +74.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -21.9% | +46.8% | -7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -20.7% | +39.3% | -10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +18.1% | +22.9% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +26.9% | +18.3% | +18.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -137.3% | 0.0% | +23.4% | +83.2% |
Valuation Metrics
IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, IMMR trades at a 95% valuation discount to MSFT's 30.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMMR's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CYBR's 908.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $211M | $3.4B | $3.13T | $20.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $455M | $3.7B | $3.21T | $21.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.58x | -25.38x | 30.86x | -139.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.49x | 242.23x | 25.34x | 81.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.95x | — | 19.72x | 908.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 5.40x | 11.10x | 15.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 6.19x | 9.15x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.99x | 43.66x | 79.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNS's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs IMMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | -27.4% | +33.1% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -8.2% | +19.2% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.2% | -11.0% | +24.9% | -3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.8% | -14.0% | +29.7% | -3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.96x | 0.33x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $244M | $369M | $81.9B | $599M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $202M | $30.2B | $623M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $322M | $572M | $112.2B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.24x | -9.01x | 55.65x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CYBR five years ago would be worth $34,006 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,014 for VRNS. Over the past 12 months, CYBR leads with a +13.3% total return vs VRNS's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYBR at 43.4% vs IMMR's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | -10.5% | -10.8% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | -36.7% | -2.1% | +13.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.4% | +23.7% | +39.5% | +194.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.1% | -39.9% | +72.5% | +240.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | +317.5% | +787.7% | +901.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +7.3% | +11.7% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMMR and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMMR's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMMR currently trades 79.6% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.95x | 0.89x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.15 | $63.90 | $555.45 | $526.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.25 | $19.70 | $356.28 | $347.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +44.9% | +75.8% | +77.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 66.1 | 54.0 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 518K | 2.3M | 32.5M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IMMR and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMMR as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", CYBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.1% upside for IMMR (target: $10) vs 12.3% for CYBR (target: $459). For income investors, IMMR offers the higher dividend yield at 5.98% vs MSFT's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $36.00 | $551.75 | $459.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 34 | 81 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 19 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | — | $3.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.4% | +0.6% | +0.0% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMMR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IMMR vs VRNS vs MSFT vs CYBR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger pick with 35.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 2% for Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immersion Corporation (IMMR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR?
On trailing P/E, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the cheapest at 1.
6x versus Microsoft Corporation at 30. 9x. On forward P/E, Immersion Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR?
Over the past 5 years, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) delivered a total return of +240. 1%, compared to -39. 9% for Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYBR returned +901. 8% versus IMMR's +13. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Immersion Corporation's 1. 52β — meaning IMMR is approximately 71% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 96% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is pulling ahead at 35.
4% versus 13. 2% for Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for CyberArk Software Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMMR leads at 227. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -20. 7% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRNS leads at 79. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) trades at 15.
5x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 226. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMMR: 54. 1% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR?
In this comparison, IMMR (6.
0% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. VRNS, CYBR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMMR or VRNS or MSFT or CYBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, IMMR: +13. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMMR and VRNS and MSFT and CYBR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CYBR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. IMMR, MSFT pay a dividend while VRNS, CYBR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.