Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IMPP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs TOPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
IMPP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs TOPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $167M | $78M | $3.09B | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $68M | $1.04B | $123M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $-44M | $84M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 23.8% | 33.0% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | -62.2% | 13.6% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.4x | 2.3x | 8.0x | 2.0x |
| Total Debt | $79K | $111M | $1.07B | $251M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $88M | $500M | $8M |
IMPP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs TOPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Petroleum … (IMPP) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 118.3 | +18.3% |
| Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMPP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs TOPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMPP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 7.92x
- Beta 0.65, yield 1.1%, current ratio 7.92x
- 28.6% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
- +86.7% vs TOPS's -61.1%
CTRM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 3.2%
- 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs IMPP's -95.6%
TOPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- 3.8% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1%
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 8.0x)
- Beta 0.54 vs CTRM's 1.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 8.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.6% margin vs CTRM's -65.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs CTRM's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.7% vs TOPS's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs CTRM's -6.3%, ROIC 10.6% vs 0.2% |
IMPP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs TOPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMPP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs TOPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
IMPP leads 1 • SBLK leads 1 • CTRM leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 15.4x CTRM's $68M. IMPP is the more profitable business, keeping 28.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRM's -65.4%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $68M | $1.0B | $123M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | -$27M | $311M | $66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | -$44M | $84M | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | -$58M | $209M | -$63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +23.8% | +33.0% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | -62.2% | +13.6% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | -65.4% | +8.1% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.9% | -86.1% | +20.0% | -50.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | +10.2% | -2.7% | +100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -94.1% | +58.3% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TOPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 95% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMPP's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $167M | $78M | $3.1B | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $102M | $3.7B | $254M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.51x | 2.32x | 36.73x | 2.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.40x | — | 8.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.63x | 5.86x | 11.87x | 4.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 1.18x | 2.97x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 0.13x | 1.26x | 0.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.26x | — | 14.73x | 0.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMPP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMPP delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CTRM. IMPP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs TOPS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | -8.0% | +3.4% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | -6.3% | +2.2% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +0.2% | +3.2% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +0.2% | +4.0% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.18x | 0.44x | 1.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$68M | $23M | $572M | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $88M | $500M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78,761 | $111M | $1.1B | $251M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.99x | -4.80x | 2.08x | 1.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBLK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBLK five years ago would be worth $17,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, IMPP leads with a +86.7% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBLK at 17.1% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.5% | -4.7% | +40.3% | -53.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.7% | -4.7% | +83.1% | -61.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.4% | -69.4% | +60.6% | -75.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | -88.4% | +79.1% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | -99.0% | +977.3% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.3% | -32.6% | +17.1% | -37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SBLK and TOPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTRM's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.22x | 0.73x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.57 | $2.65 | $27.20 | $11.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.45 | $1.66 | $14.79 | $2.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.7% | +76.1% | +98.6% | +19.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 55.5 | 72.8 | 24.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 747K | 52K | 1.4M | 210K |
Analyst Outlook
CTRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMPP as "Hold", SBLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for IMPP (target: $6) vs 8.2% for SBLK (target: $29). For income investors, CTRM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs IMPP's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | — | $29.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 24 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.2% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.06 | $0.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +100.0% |
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMPP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
IMPP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs TOPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS?
On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS?
Over the past 5 years, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) delivered a total return of +79. 1%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Castor Maritime Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning CTRM is approximately 125% more volatile than TOPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMPP leads at 104. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS?
Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 0% net margin versus 5. 8% for Top Ships Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus 2. 3% for CTRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOPS leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) trades at 2. 4x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMPP: 22. 2% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS?
In this comparison, CTRM (3.
2% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield), IMPP (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TOPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMPP or CTRM or SBLK or TOPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, CTRM: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMPP and CTRM and SBLK and TOPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMPP (Energy) and CTRM (Industrials) and SBLK (Industrials) and TOPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTRM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock. IMPP, CTRM, SBLK pay a dividend while TOPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.