Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMUX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs PTCT vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
IMUX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs PTCT vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $137M | $3.61B | $7.70B | $6.23B | $30.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.10B | $0.00 | $827M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $376M | $-327M | $-187M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% | — | 77.8% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.4% | — | -8.2% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 54.2x | — | 84.8x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $684K | $52M | $110K | $492M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $178M | $357M | $985M | $1.98B |
IMUX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs PTCT vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) | 100 | 8.8 | -91.3% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 144.0 | +44.0% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 117.8 | +17.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMUX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs PTCT vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, IMUX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6%
- 26.2% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +491.9% vs ACAD's -3.0%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -36.1%
- Beta 0.89, current ratio 2.35x
- 114.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.16
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs IMUX's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +491.9% vs ACAD's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0% |
IMUX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs PTCT vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMUX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs PTCT vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • IMUX leads 0 • PTCT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTCT's -22.6%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $0 | $827M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $96M | -$357M | -$21M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | $376M | -$327M | -$187M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | $212M | -$283M | -$229M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.5% | — | +77.8% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% | — | -8.2% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +34.3% | — | -22.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +19.4% | — | -27.7% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% | — | -76.8% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.8% | -81.8% | +2.7% | -100.3% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and IQV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 60% valuation discount to IQV's 23.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 25.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137M | $3.6B | $7.7B | $6.2B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $122M | $3.5B | $7.3B | $5.7B | $45.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.22x | 9.21x | -19.77x | 9.66x | 23.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 54.20x | — | 84.80x | 14.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.09x | — | 6.41x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.37x | — | 3.60x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.94x | 6.83x | — | 4.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.34x | — | 8.87x | 15.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACAD and PTCT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +35.6% | -43.0% | — | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -132.0% | +26.2% | -40.2% | -6.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.0% | -65.0% | — | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.0% | +10.1% | -49.3% | +55.9% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.00x | — | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$126M | -$357M | -$492M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $178M | $357M | $985M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,000 | $52M | $110,000 | $492M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -1.00x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $17,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $976 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs ACAD's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs IMUX's -6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +137.7% | -19.3% | -6.9% | -2.1% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.2% | -3.0% | +491.9% | +47.4% | +14.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.0% | -14.3% | +1757.4% | +73.3% | -14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.2% | -22.6% | -14.2% | +71.1% | -25.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -44.6% | -36.1% | +995.3% | +177.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.4% | -5.0% | +164.8% | +20.1% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMUX and PTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTCT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMUX currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs PRAX's 72.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.10x | 1.55x | 0.89x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.77 | $27.81 | $366.52 | $87.50 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $19.69 | $37.19 | $43.18 | $153.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +75.8% | +72.7% | +85.9% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 47.9 | 31.9 | 59.5 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 291K | 1.4M | 396K | 1.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMUX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 4.6% for IMUX (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $34.78 | $607.15 | $95.83 | $222.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 37 | 16 | 26 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
ACAD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
IMUX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs PTCT vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (54. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +71. 1%, compared to -90. 2% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +995. 3% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning IMUX is approximately 102% more volatile than PTCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 84. 8x for PTC Therapeutics, Inc. — 70. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127. 8% to $607. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IMUX or ACAD or PRAX or PTCT or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), +995. 3% 10Y return). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +995. 3%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMUX and ACAD and PRAX and PTCT and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.