Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IMVT vs DAWN vs RCUS vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
IMVT vs DAWN vs RCUS vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5.83B | $2.22B | $2.62B | $7.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $158M | $236M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-464M | $-107M | $-369M | $-303M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% | 90.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -80.8% | -168.6% | — |
| Total Debt | $98K | $3M | $99M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $714M | $197M | $222M | $357M |
IMVT vs DAWN vs RCUS vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 189.1 | +89.1% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMVT vs DAWN vs RCUS vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 188.1% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 52.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
- 3.2% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
DAWN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.35
- Rev growth 20.6%, EPS growth -2.0%
- 20.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.35 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage
RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.6% vs IMVT's +107.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.6% vs IMVT's +107.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -20.7% ROA vs PRAX's -53.5%, ROIC -30.5% vs -65.0% |
IMVT vs DAWN vs RCUS vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMVT vs DAWN vs RCUS vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories
RCUS leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • IMVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAWN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. DAWN is the more profitable business, keeping -67.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $158M | $236M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$487M | -$124M | -$391M | -$326M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$464M | -$107M | -$369M | -$303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$423M | -$108M | -$489M | -$249M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.1% | +90.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -80.8% | -168.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -67.8% | -156.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -68.0% | -2.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +83.9% | -39.3% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.7% | +70.0% | +10.5% | -19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RCUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.8B | $2.2B | $2.6B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $2.0B | $2.5B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.50x | -20.70x | -7.90x | -25.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 14.06x | 10.60x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.14x | 5.05x | 4.43x | 8.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN delivers a -23.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DAWN scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.1% | -23.4% | -69.0% | -58.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.1% | -20.7% | -35.3% | -53.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -30.5% | -64.1% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -66.1% | -26.7% | -42.1% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$714M | -$194M | -$123M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $714M | $197M | $222M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98,000 | $3M | $99M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -13.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $17,386 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,157 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +860.9% total return vs IMVT's +107.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 176.1% vs RCUS's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.7% | +143.3% | +11.6% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +107.2% | +208.0% | +220.2% | +860.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +65.1% | +31.0% | +2005.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.9% | -8.4% | -13.7% | -18.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.1% | -8.4% | +52.9% | -19.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +18.2% | +9.4% | +176.1% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs RCUS's 90.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 0.35x | 1.95x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.09 | $21.53 | $28.72 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.36 | $5.64 | $7.06 | $34.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +100.0% | +90.5% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 80.3 | 60.9 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 4.9M | 1.2M | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMVT as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 10.3% for DAWN (target: $24).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.50 | $23.75 | $30.00 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 12 | 18 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IMVT vs DAWN vs RCUS vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMVT or DAWN or RCUS or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMVT or DAWN or RCUS or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to -18. 4% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +188. 1% versus PRAX's -19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMVT or DAWN or RCUS or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 451% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IMVT or DAWN or RCUS or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS -2. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMVT or DAWN or RCUS or PRAX?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IMVT or DAWN or RCUS or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IMVT or DAWN or RCUS or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAWN: -8. 4%, RCUS: +52. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IMVT and DAWN and RCUS and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.