Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INBK vs CFFN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
INBK vs CFFN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $222M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $323M | $417M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $73M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 19.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $457M | $252M |
INBK vs CFFN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Internet Banc… (INBK) | 100 | 158.7 | +58.7% |
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBK vs CFFN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 15.5% 10Y total return vs CFFN's 12.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 98.7%, current ratio 0.23x
- NIM 2.0% vs CFFN's 1.8%
CFFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 4.4%
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- Beta 1.01, yield 4.4%, current ratio 0.17x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs INBK's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs INBK's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CFFN's 4.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs INBK's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs INBK's 0.3% |
INBK vs CFFN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INBK vs CFFN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFN and INBK operate at a comparable scale, with $417M and $323M in trailing revenue. CFFN is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBK's -10.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $323M | $417M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | $97M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +19.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
INBK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $222M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.33x | 15.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 11.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.81x | 20.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CFFN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CFFN delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INBK. INBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFN scores 7/9 vs INBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 1.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $457M | $252M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFN five years ago would be worth $8,144 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,745 for INBK. Over the past 12 months, CFFN leads with a +44.6% total return vs INBK's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBK at 33.9% vs CFFN's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | +20.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +44.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.9% | +60.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | +12.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.9% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CFFN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFFN is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBK's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFFN currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs INBK's 89.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.51 | $7.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.05 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.5% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 926K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — INBK and CFFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INBK as "Hold" and CFFN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.8% upside for INBK (target: $27) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, CFFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs INBK's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% |
CFFN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INBK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
INBK vs CFFN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBK or CFFN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Internet Bancorp (INBK) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBK or CFFN?
On forward P/E, First Internet Bancorp is actually cheaper at 11.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBK or CFFN?
Over the past 5 years, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) delivered a total return of -18. 6%, compared to -22. 6% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INBK returned +15. 5% versus CFFN's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBK or CFFN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus First Internet Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning INBK is approximately 0% more volatile than CFFN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Internet Bancorp (INBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 99% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBK or CFFN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to -239. 9% for First Internet Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBK or CFFN?
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 3% net margin versus -10. 9% for First Internet Bancorp — meaning it keeps 16. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CFFN leads at 19. 9% versus -15. 8% for INBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CFFN leads at 47. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBK or CFFN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Internet Bancorp (INBK) trades at 11.
4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INBK: 3. 8% to $26. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBK or CFFN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 9% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK).
09Is INBK or CFFN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 4. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFFN: +12. 0%, INBK: +15. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBK and CFFN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare CFFN vs WAFD
WAFD is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CFFN.
Compare INBK vs SOFI
SOFI overlaps with INBK in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With WAFD + HOMB
WAFD and HOMB are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.