Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $222M | $1.02B | $2.73B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $323M | $417M | $1.41B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $73M | $243M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 47.3% | 50.9% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 19.9% | 20.5% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.8x | 10.9x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $1.95B | $1.82B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $457M | $252M | $657M | $910M |
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Internet Banc… (INBK) | 100 | 158.7 | +58.7% |
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 11.8x)
CFFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- Beta 1.01, yield 4.4%, current ratio 0.17x
- 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAFD's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- 84.4% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.00x
- PEG 3.55 vs CFFN's 5.80
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.8% vs CFFN's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAFD's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs INBK's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WAFD's 0.3% |
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
INBK leads 2 • WAFD leads 1 • CFFN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.5x INBK's $323M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBK's -10.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $323M | $417M | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | $97M | $277M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $73M | $243M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $61M | $226M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +47.3% | +50.9% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +19.9% | +20.5% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +16.3% | +16.0% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +11.9% | +14.8% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | +33.3% | +46.3% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 11% valuation discount to CFFN's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 4.39x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $222M | $1.0B | $2.7B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121M | $2.7B | $3.9B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.33x | 15.04x | 13.56x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 11.85x | 10.93x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.36x | 4.41x | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.91x | 12.98x | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.43x | 1.93x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.97x | 0.94x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.81x | 20.37x | 13.09x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INBK. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFN scores 7/9 vs INBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +7.0% | +8.0% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +0.7% | +1.0% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +2.0% | +3.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | +2.5% | +5.7% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 1.86x | 0.60x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $1.7B | $1.2B | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $457M | $252M | $657M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 0.41x | 0.48x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,745 for INBK. Over the past 12 months, CFFN leads with a +44.6% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBK at 33.9% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | +20.0% | +11.9% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +44.6% | +28.5% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.9% | +60.9% | +51.6% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | -18.6% | +22.5% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | +12.0% | +84.4% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.9% | +17.2% | +14.9% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBK's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.01x | 0.81x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.51 | $7.96 | $36.12 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.05 | $5.51 | $26.31 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.5% | +98.2% | +98.8% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 60.7 | 68.3 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 926K | 661K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CFFN and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INBK as "Hold", CFFN as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, CFFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs INBK's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $7.00 | $35.00 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 11 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +4.4% | +3.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 7 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $0.34 | $1.05 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% | +3.7% | +1.6% |
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INBK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Internet Bancorp (INBK) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WaFd, Inc. wins at 3. 55x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 5%, compared to -22. 6% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAFD returned +84. 4% versus CFFN's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus First Internet Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning INBK is approximately 24% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to -239. 9% for First Internet Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -10. 9% for First Internet Bancorp — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -15. 8% for INBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 65. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 55x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 9% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK).
09Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 4%, INBK: +15. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBK and CFFN and WAFD and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.