Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
INFY vs MPWR vs ENTG vs WIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Information Technology Services
INFY vs MPWR vs ENTG vs WIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $51.04B | $77.41B | $22.48B | $20.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.85B | $2.79B | $3.24B | $900.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.21B | $616M | $265M | $135.47B |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 55.2% | 43.2% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 26.1% | 29.1% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.5x | 73.1x | 41.4x | 0.2x |
| Total Debt | $962M | $24M | $3.89B | $192.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.86B | $1.10B | $360M | $121.97B |
INFY vs MPWR vs ENTG vs WIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infosys Limited (INFY) | 100 | 138.3 | +38.3% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
| Wipro Limited (WIT) | 100 | 119.3 | +19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INFY vs MPWR vs ENTG vs WIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INFY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 4.6%
- 4.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%
- 18.6% ROA vs ENTG's 3.1%, ROIC 31.8% vs 9.3%
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
- 26.4% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
ENTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WIT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.02 vs MPWR's 2.48
- Beta 0.64, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.72x
- Lower P/E (0.2x vs 41.4x)
- Beta 0.64 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs ENTG's 8.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +148.6% vs WIT's -27.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.6% ROA vs ENTG's 3.1%, ROIC 31.8% vs 9.3% |
INFY vs MPWR vs ENTG vs WIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INFY vs MPWR vs ENTG vs WIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories
WIT leads 1 • INFY leads 1 • ENTG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WIT is the larger business by revenue, generating $900.0B annually — 322.5x MPWR's $2.8B. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENTG's 8.2%. On growth, MPWR holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.8B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $900.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $781M | $1.3B | $178.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.2B | $616M | $265M | $135.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.8B | $664M | $721M | $145.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +55.2% | +43.2% | +30.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +26.1% | +29.1% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +22.1% | +8.2% | +15.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +23.8% | +22.3% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +20.8% | +5.0% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | -88.4% | +46.3% | +1.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WIT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, WIT trades at a 88% valuation discount to MPWR's 123.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WIT offers better value at 1.75x vs MPWR's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $51.0B | $77.4B | $22.5B | $20.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49.1B | $76.3B | $26.0B | $21.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.56x | 123.60x | 95.26x | 14.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.52x | 73.12x | 41.38x | 0.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.48x | 4.19x | — | 1.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.59x | 97.90x | 19.81x | 11.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.65x | 27.74x | 7.03x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 21.56x | 5.68x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.49x | 116.20x | 56.74x | 12.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INFY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INFY delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $7 for ENTG. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENTG's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WIT scores 7/9 vs ENTG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.6% | +17.9% | +6.7% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.6% | +15.2% | +3.1% | +10.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.8% | +22.2% | +9.3% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.5% | +20.4% | +11.7% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.01x | 0.98x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | -$1.1B | $3.5B | $70.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.9B | $1.1B | $360M | $122.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $962M | $24M | $3.9B | $192.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 90.32x | — | 2.47x | 12.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,881 for WIT. Over the past 12 months, MPWR leads with a +148.6% total return vs WIT's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs INFY's -2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.7% | +68.5% | +65.1% | -29.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.0% | +148.6% | +88.9% | -27.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | +280.3% | +87.4% | -5.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | +366.2% | +30.4% | -41.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.6% | +2494.7% | +1040.3% | +0.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.6% | +56.1% | +23.3% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MPWR and WIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WIT is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPWR currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs INFY's 41.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 2.28x | 2.66x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.00 | $1662.00 | $159.15 | $3.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.16 | $613.00 | $66.32 | $1.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.9% | +94.8% | +92.8% | +63.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 71.0 | 63.8 | 35.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16.2M | 577K | 2.4M | 13.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — INFY and MPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INFY as "Hold", MPWR as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", WIT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 271.2% upside for WIT (target: $7) vs 2.5% for MPWR (target: $1615). For income investors, INFY offers the higher dividend yield at 4.62% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.90 | $1615.00 | $152.00 | $7.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 25 | 26 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +0.4% | +0.3% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | $5.90 | $0.40 | $5.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
INFY vs MPWR vs ENTG vs WIT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). Wipro Limited (WIT) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (0. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT?
On trailing P/E, Wipro Limited (WIT) is the cheapest at 15.
0x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. at 123. 6x. On forward P/E, Wipro Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Wipro Limited wins at 0. 02x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -41. 2% for Wipro Limited (WIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus WIT's +0. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wipro Limited (WIT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 319% more volatile than WIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 98% for Entegris, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wipro Limited grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 7. 4% for Entegris, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus 17. 0% for WIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Wipro Limited (WIT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Wipro Limited (WIT) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 73. 1x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 73. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WIT: 271. 2% to $7. 35.
08Which pays a better dividend — INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Infosys Limited (INFY) offers the highest yield at 4. 6%, versus 0. 3% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG).
09Is INFY or MPWR or ENTG or WIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wipro Limited (WIT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 3. 2% yield). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WIT: +0. 3%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INFY and MPWR and ENTG and WIT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INFY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WIT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. INFY, WIT pay a dividend while MPWR, ENTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.