Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ING vs BBVA vs SAN vs DB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
ING vs BBVA vs SAN vs DB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $85.67B | $122.83B | $178.56B | $60.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.04B | $36.93B | $119.89B | $60.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.33B | $10.51B | $14.10B | $6.93B |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 83.6% | 40.0% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 39.7% | 43.9% | 15.6% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 10.8x | 10.2x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $169.33B | $81.84B | $496.64B | $254.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52.89B | $93.95B | $179.30B | $171.62B |
ING vs BBVA vs SAN vs DB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ING Groep N.V. (ING) | 100 | 466.8 | +366.8% |
| Banco Bilbao Vizcay… (BBVA) | 100 | 703.2 | +603.2% |
| Banco Santander, S.… (SAN) | 100 | 558.0 | +458.0% |
| Deutsche Bank AG (DB) | 100 | 374.6 | +274.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ING vs BBVA vs SAN vs DB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ING is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.13
- Beta 1.13 vs SAN's 1.48, lower leverage
BBVA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 0.6%
- 319.6% 10Y total return vs ING's 229.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, current ratio 0.44x
- Beta 1.28, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.44x
SAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs ING's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +73.0% vs DB's +20.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs ING's 0.5%
DB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.08 vs ING's 0.46
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% NII/revenue growth vs ING's -65.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs ING's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs SAN's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.0% vs DB's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs ING's 0.5% |
ING vs BBVA vs SAN vs DB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BBVA leads in 2 of 6 categories
DB leads 2 • SAN leads 1 • ING leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBVA leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $119.9B annually — 5.2x ING's $23.0B. BBVA is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DB's 11.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.0B | $36.9B | $119.9B | $60.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.1B | $17.7B | $22.4B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $10.5B | $14.1B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $13.7B | -$12.3B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | +83.6% | +40.0% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.7% | +43.9% | +15.6% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +28.5% | +11.8% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +38.3% | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | +5.0% | +20.0% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, DB trades at a 27% valuation discount to ING's 12.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DB offers better value at 0.08x vs ING's 0.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85.7B | $122.8B | $178.6B | $60.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $222.5B | $108.6B | $551.5B | $158.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.95x | 11.01x | 11.90x | 8.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.40x | 10.80x | 10.23x | 9.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.44x | 0.17x | — | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.70x | 5.21x | 21.47x | 13.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.16x | 2.83x | 1.27x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 1.80x | 1.46x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.39x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBVA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBVA delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $9 for DB. BBVA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAN's 4.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBVA scores 6/9 vs SAN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +17.2% | +12.8% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +7.0% | +2.3% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +7.6% | +1.6% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.32x | 1.32x | 4.40x | 3.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116.4B | -$12.1B | $317.3B | $83.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52.9B | $94.0B | $179.3B | $171.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $169.3B | $81.8B | $496.6B | $254.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.99x | 1.24x | 0.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBVA five years ago would be worth $42,520 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,527 for DB. Over the past 12 months, SAN leads with a +73.0% total return vs DB's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAN at 54.5% vs ING's 39.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.3% | -5.9% | +1.7% | -20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.6% | +61.4% | +73.0% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.4% | +246.5% | +268.6% | +210.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.2% | +325.2% | +234.0% | +135.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.2% | +319.6% | +227.3% | +101.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.3% | +51.3% | +54.5% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ING leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ING is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAN's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ING currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs DB's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.28x | 1.48x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.18 | $26.20 | $13.24 | $40.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.07 | $14.12 | $7.15 | $26.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +83.5% | +91.9% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 50.6 | 56.5 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 1.9M | 12.5M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
DB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ING as "Buy", BBVA as "Buy", SAN as "Buy", DB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -24.4% upside for ING (target: $23) vs -75.3% for SAN (target: $3). BBVA is the only dividend payer here at 3.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | — | $3.00 | $14.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 13 | 23 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BBVA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
ING vs BBVA vs SAN vs DB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ING or BBVA or SAN or DB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.
A. (BBVA) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 3% for ING Groep N. V. (ING). Deutsche Bank AG (DB) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ING Groep N. V. (ING) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ING or BBVA or SAN or DB?
On trailing P/E, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the cheapest at 8.
7x versus ING Groep N. V. at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, Deutsche Bank AG is actually cheaper at 9. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deutsche Bank AG wins at 0. 08x versus ING Groep N. V. 's 0. 46x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ING or BBVA or SAN or DB?
Over the past 5 years, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.
A. (BBVA) delivered a total return of +325. 2%, compared to +135. 3% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BBVA returned +319. 6% versus DB's +101. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ING or BBVA or SAN or DB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ING Groep N.
V. (ING) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Banco Santander, S. A. 's 1. 48β — meaning SAN is approximately 31% more volatile than ING relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A. (BBVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 132% versus 4% for Banco Santander, S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ING or BBVA or SAN or DB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.
A. (BBVA) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -65. 3% for ING Groep N. V. (ING). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deutsche Bank AG grew EPS 125. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ING or BBVA or SAN or DB?
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.
A. (BBVA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 11. 4% for Deutsche Bank AG — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BBVA leads at 43. 9% versus 15. 6% for SAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ING leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ING or BBVA or SAN or DB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 08x versus ING Groep N. V. 's 0. 46x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for ING Groep N. V. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ING: -24. 4% to $22. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ING or BBVA or SAN or DB?
In this comparison, BBVA (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ING, SAN, DB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ING or BBVA or SAN or DB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.
A. (BBVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28), 3. 6% yield, +319. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBVA: +319. 6%, DB: +101. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ING and BBVA and SAN and DB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BBVA pays a dividend while ING, SAN, DB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.