Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INSE vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs DKNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
INSE vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs DKNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $219M | $2.24B | $5.66B | $9.75B | $12.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $301M | $6.96B | $11.56B | $17.72B | $6.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-843M | $-485M | $183M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 58.9% | 30.6% | 43.9% | 44.2% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | -7.9% | 17.8% | 5.2% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 23.0x | — | 22.1x | 99.1x |
| Total Debt | $372M | $8.38B | $26.34B | $56.16B | $1.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $687M | $887M | $2.06B | $1.60B |
INSE vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs DKNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspired Entertainm… (INSE) | 100 | 301.1 | +201.1% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSE vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs DKNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INSE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 99.1x)
PENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CZR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27
- 302.6% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
MGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 1.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
- +20.1% vs DKNG's -27.3%
- 0.4% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 1.7% vs 1.8%
DKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs INSE's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.1% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 1.7% vs 1.8% |
INSE vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs DKNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INSE vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs DKNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
INSE leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • CZR leads 0 • MGM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 58.9x INSE's $301M. MGM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $301M | $7.0B | $11.6B | $17.7B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | -$105M | $3.5B | $2.0B | $266M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$843M | -$485M | $183M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | -$169M | $538M | $1.7B | $612M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.9% | +30.6% | +43.9% | +44.2% | +41.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | -7.9% | +17.8% | +5.2% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | -12.1% | -4.2% | +1.0% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -2.4% | +4.7% | +9.8% | +10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +8.2% | +2.7% | +4.2% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +37.5% | +11.1% | -5.9% | +192.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INSE and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INSE's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $219M | $2.2B | $5.7B | $9.8B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $549M | $9.9B | $31.1B | $63.8B | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.97x | -2.88x | -11.48x | 50.14x | -3113.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | 22.95x | — | 22.10x | 99.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.83x | 13.81x | 8.90x | 31.61x | 49.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 0.32x | 0.49x | 0.56x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.33x | 1.57x | 3.08x | 19.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.45x | — | 10.88x | 5.85x | 19.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGM delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. DKNG carries lower financial leverage with a 3.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs MGM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -34.7% | -12.6% | +5.3% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | -5.7% | -1.5% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +1.8% | +5.4% | +1.7% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +2.0% | +7.0% | +2.6% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.58x | 7.15x | 17.14x | 3.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $330M | $7.7B | $25.5B | $54.1B | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $687M | $887M | $2.1B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $8.4B | $26.3B | $56.2B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | -1.02x | 0.90x | 1.52x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZR and DKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSE five years ago would be worth $9,552 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, MGM leads with a +20.1% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKNG at 1.4% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | +12.9% | +17.9% | +4.4% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +6.7% | +2.5% | +20.1% | -27.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | -35.3% | -38.6% | -12.3% | +4.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.5% | -80.6% | -73.7% | -4.5% | -47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.9% | +11.9% | +302.6% | +81.8% | +157.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | -13.5% | -15.0% | -4.3% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGM and DKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DKNG is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSE's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.34x | 1.27x | 1.28x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.95 | $20.61 | $31.58 | $40.94 | $48.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.10 | $11.65 | $17.95 | $29.19 | $20.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +81.4% | +88.0% | +93.1% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 55.1 | 54.5 | 50.0 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 4.4M | 4.6M | 4.4M | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSE as "Buy", PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.5% upside for INSE (target: $19) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | $19.88 | $30.57 | $39.71 | $36.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 47 | 30 | 36 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +15.8% | +4.0% | +12.6% | +6.6% |
DKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
INSE vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs DKNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). MGM Resorts International (MGM) offers the better valuation at 50. 1x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG?
On forward P/E, Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG?
Over the past 5 years, Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) delivered a total return of -4. 5%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +302. 6% versus INSE's -17. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Inspired Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning INSE is approximately 58% more volatile than DKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG?
MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSE leads at 54. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 78. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSE: 131. 5% to $18. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is INSE or PENN or CZR or MGM or DKNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +157. 3% 10Y return). Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKNG: +157. 3%, INSE: -17. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INSE and PENN and CZR and MGM and DKNG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.