Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INTR vs SOFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
INTR vs SOFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $2.54B | $20.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.71B | $4.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.21B | $481M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 27.0x |
| Total Debt | $11.86B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.84B | $4.93B |
INTR vs SOFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) | 100 | 373.3 | +273.3% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 309.3 | +209.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INTR vs SOFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 0.4%
- 131.7% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 55.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, current ratio 0.54x
SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 0.0%
- 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs INTR's 27.1%
- +28.0% vs INTR's +18.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs INTR's 27.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 27.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SOFI's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs SOFI's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs INTR's +18.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SOFI's 0.6% |
INTR vs SOFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INTR vs SOFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.7B annually — 2.0x SOFI's $4.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.1% (SOFI) to 9.3% (INTR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.7B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $760M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $481M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.9B | -$2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.4% | +75.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | -83.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.9% | -56.7% |
Valuation Metrics
INTR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, INTR trades at a 55% valuation discount to SOFI's 41.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INTR's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOFI's 23.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $20.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $17.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.70x | 41.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.88x | 26.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.42x | 23.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 4.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
INTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INTR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for SOFI. SOFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INTR's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTR scores 7/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.0B | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.8B | $4.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.9B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INTR five years ago would be worth $23,170 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,867 for SOFI. Over the past 12 months, SOFI leads with a +28.0% total return vs INTR's +18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INTR at 62.5% vs SOFI's 43.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.9% | -40.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.2% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +328.9% | +198.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.7% | +8.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.7% | +55.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.5% | +43.9% |
Risk & Volatility
INTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INTR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOFI's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INTR currently trades 75.7% from its 52-week high vs SOFI's 49.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.36 | $32.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.40 | $12.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +49.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 66.0M |
Analyst Outlook
INTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INTR as "Buy" and SOFI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for INTR (target: $12) vs 28.2% for SOFI (target: $21). INTR is the only dividend payer here at 0.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $20.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% |
INTR leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
INTR vs SOFI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INTR or SOFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is the stronger pick with 28. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 1% for Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR). Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INTR or SOFI?
On trailing P/E, Inter & Co, Inc.
(INTR) is the cheapest at 18. 7x versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. at 41. 8x. On forward P/E, Inter & Co, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INTR or SOFI?
Over the past 5 years, Inter & Co, Inc.
(INTR) delivered a total return of +131. 7%, compared to +8. 7% for SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INTR returned +131. 7% versus SOFI's +55. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INTR or SOFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inter & Co, Inc.
(INTR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning SOFI is approximately 82% more volatile than INTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 131% for Inter & Co, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INTR or SOFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is pulling ahead at 28. 8% versus 27. 1% for Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inter & Co, Inc. grew EPS 176. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INTR or SOFI?
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus 9. 3% for Inter & Co, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INTR leads at 12. 4% versus 11. 0% for SOFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOFI leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INTR or SOFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Inter & Co, Inc.
(INTR) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 0x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 25. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INTR: 53. 1% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INTR or SOFI?
In this comparison, INTR (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SOFI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INTR or SOFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inter & Co, Inc.
(INTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+131. 7% 10Y return). SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INTR: +131. 7%, SOFI: +55. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INTR and SOFI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.