IOT vs GRMN

For growth investors, Samsara Inc.

(IOT) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 1% for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) offers the better valuation at 28. 2x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Samsara Inc. (IOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Garmin Ltd.

is actually cheaper at 25. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) delivered a total return of +79. 0%, compared to +21. 9% for Samsara Inc. (IOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRMN returned +563. 1% versus IOT's +21. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Samsara Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning IOT is approximately 12% more volatile than GRMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Samsara Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Samsara Inc.

(IOT) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus 15. 1% for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Samsara Inc. grew EPS 92. 9% year-over-year, compared to 17. 7% for Garmin Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOT leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 0% net margin versus -0. 6% for Samsara Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRMN leads at 25. 9% versus -3. 2% for IOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IOT leads at 76. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) trades at 25. 5x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Samsara Inc. — 33. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOT: 52. 2% to $45. 82.

In this comparison, GRMN (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. IOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +563. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRMN: +563. 1%, IOT: +21. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

GRMN pays a dividend while IOT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.