Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IOT vs MBLY vs TRAK vs LAZR vs OUST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Software - Application
Auto - Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
IOT vs MBLY vs TRAK vs LAZR vs OUST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Auto - Parts | Software - Application | Auto - Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $8.03B | $7.48B | $186M | $2M | $1.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.62B | $2.01B | $24M | $76M | $185M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-4.11B | $7M | $-234M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 76.7% | 48.3% | 85.0% | -21.3% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | -209.5% | 30.2% | -332.8% | -37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 58.6x | 33.8x | 28.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $73M | $0.00 | $510K | $535M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $1.84B | $29M | $83M | $67M |
IOT vs MBLY vs TRAK vs LAZR vs OUST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 241.6 | +141.6% |
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 210.1 | +110.1% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Ouster, Inc. (OUST) | 100 | 201.6 | +101.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOT vs MBLY vs TRAK vs LAZR vs OUST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 92.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- 20.4% 10Y total return vs TRAK's 15.4%
MBLY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.83
TRAK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- Beta 1.09, yield 0.8%, current ratio 6.09x
- Better valuation composite
- 30.9% margin vs LAZR's -308.4%
Among these 5 stocks, LAZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OUST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 52.5% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0%
- +191.3% vs LAZR's -98.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.5% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs LAZR's -308.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs OUST's 3.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +191.3% vs LAZR's -98.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs LAZR's -81.0%, ROIC 21.4% vs -123.6% |
IOT vs MBLY vs TRAK vs LAZR vs OUST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IOT vs MBLY vs TRAK vs LAZR vs OUST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories
OUST leads 1 • MBLY leads 1 • IOT leads 0 • LAZR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 85.7x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAZR's -3.1%. On growth, OUST holds the edge at +48.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $2.0B | $24M | $76M | $185M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | -$3.8B | $8M | -$229M | -$60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$4.1B | $7M | -$234M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $482M | $7M | -$209M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.7% | +48.3% | +85.0% | -21.3% | +49.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -2.1% | +30.2% | -3.3% | -37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | -2.0% | +30.9% | -3.1% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +23.9% | +29.1% | -2.8% | -37.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +27.4% | +6.7% | +21.0% | +48.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -35.0% | +13.2% | -2.6% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MBLY and TRAK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRAK's 21.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBLY's 73.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.0B | $7.5B | $186M | $2M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $5.6B | $158M | $454M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1487.00x | -19.15x | 29.23x | -0.01x | -23.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.61x | 33.81x | 28.03x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.85x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 73.35x | 21.16x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.96x | 3.95x | 8.24x | 0.03x | 9.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.01x | 0.63x | 3.95x | — | 5.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.69x | 14.31x | 22.17x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MBLY. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OUST's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOT scores 7/9 vs LAZR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | -37.3% | +14.6% | — | -22.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | -35.5% | +12.9% | -81.0% | -15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | -3.2% | +21.4% | -123.6% | -30.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | -3.6% | +12.9% | -118.7% | -31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | — | 0.01x | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | -$1.8B | -$28M | $452M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $1.8B | $29M | $83M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $0 | $509,973 | $535M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 165.50x | -3.73x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $20,681 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +191.3% total return vs LAZR's -98.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 78.1% vs LAZR's -91.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.3% | -18.2% | -13.4% | -24.1% | +7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.5% | -41.4% | -53.1% | -98.4% | +191.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.0% | -76.5% | +64.2% | -99.9% | +465.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.4% | -68.3% | +106.8% | -100.0% | -73.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.4% | -68.3% | +15.4% | -100.0% | -74.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | -38.3% | +18.0% | -91.4% | +78.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IOT and TRAK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OUST's 3.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IOT currently trades 61.4% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.83x | 1.09x | 2.40x | 3.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.41 | $20.18 | $23.72 | $4.82 | $41.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.38 | $6.47 | $6.94 | $0.05 | $8.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +45.5% | +43.1% | +1.3% | +60.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 60.6 | 67.5 | 36.2 | 48.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 6.2M | 154K | 418K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
MBLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOT as "Buy", MBLY as "Buy", TRAK as "Buy", OUST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 134.6% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 54.1% for IOT (target: $46). TRAK is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.82 | $14.44 | $24.00 | — | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 26 | 1 | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.09 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OUST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
IOT vs MBLY vs TRAK vs LAZR vs OUST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) is the stronger pick with 52. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (28. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Samsara Inc. (IOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST?
On forward P/E, ReposiTrak, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 28. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +106. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IOT returned +20. 4% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Ouster, Inc. 's 3. 46β — meaning OUST is approximately 217% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for Ouster, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) is pulling ahead at 52. 5% versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Samsara Inc. grew EPS 92. 9% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for ReposiTrak, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OUST leads at 60. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -362. 3% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus -577. 0% for LAZR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) trades at 28. 0x forward P/E versus 58. 6x for Samsara Inc. — 30. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 134. 6% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST?
In this comparison, TRAK (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. IOT, MBLY, LAZR, OUST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOT or MBLY or TRAK or LAZR or OUST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 8% yield). Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRAK: +15. 4%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOT and MBLY and TRAK and LAZR and OUST?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOT (Technology) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and TRAK (Technology) and LAZR (Consumer Cyclical) and OUST (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock. TRAK pays a dividend while IOT, MBLY, LAZR, OUST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.