Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IOT vs SPSC vs ORCL vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
IOT vs SPSC vs ORCL vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $2.14B | $559.27B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.62B | $762M | $64.08B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $91M | $16.21B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 76.7% | 68.0% | 66.4% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 15.3% | 30.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 59.3x | 12.7x | 26.0x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $10M | $104.10B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $151M | $10.79B | $86.81B |
IOT vs SPSC vs ORCL vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 107.1 | +7.1% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 223.1 | +123.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 162.6 | +62.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOT vs SPSC vs ORCL vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 92.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- 29.6% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4%
SPSC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- PEG 0.89 vs ORCL's 3.66
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 25.3% margin vs IOT's -0.6%
- 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ORCL's 425.1%
- +43.7% vs SPSC's -59.7%
- 11.5% ROA vs IOT's -0.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs IOT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SPSC's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs IOT's -0.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -3.8% |
IOT vs SPSC vs ORCL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IOT vs SPSC vs ORCL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOT leads 1 • SPSC leads 1 • ORCL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 974.7x SPSC's $762M. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IOT's -0.6%. On growth, IOT holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $762M | $64.1B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | $162M | $26.5B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $91M | $16.2B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $167M | -$24.7B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.7% | +68.0% | +66.4% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +15.3% | +30.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +11.9% | +25.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +21.9% | -38.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +5.8% | +21.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -8.6% | +24.5% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPSC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, SPSC trades at a 48% valuation discount to ORCL's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $2.1B | $559.3B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $2.0B | $652.6B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1505.50x | 23.24x | 44.82x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.34x | 12.73x | 25.99x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.62x | 6.31x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.30x | 27.36x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.02x | 2.84x | 9.74x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.16x | 2.23x | 26.59x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.17x | 14.04x | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-1 for IOT. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOT scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +9.5% | +56.3% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +7.9% | +8.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +12.2% | +12.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +12.5% | +14.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.01x | 4.96x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | -$141M | $93.3B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $151M | $10.8B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $10M | $104.1B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 5.44x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,811 for SPSC. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SPSC's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -35.0% | -0.1% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.2% | -59.7% | +31.6% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | -62.6% | +106.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | -41.9% | +151.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +119.8% | +425.1% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | -28.0% | +27.3% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPSC and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPSC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SPSC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 1.03x | 1.59x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.41 | $153.16 | $345.72 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.38 | $50.56 | $134.57 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +37.3% | +56.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 46.9 | 68.5 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 605K | 26.3M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOT as "Buy", SPSC as "Hold", ORCL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.2% upside for IOT (target: $46) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). ORCL is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.82 | $68.71 | $257.19 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 23 | 86 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 18 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.65 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). IOT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
IOT vs SPSC vs ORCL vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL). SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Samsara Inc. (IOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Oracle Corporation at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPS Commerce, Inc. wins at 0. 89x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -41. 9% for SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus IOT's +21. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning ORCL is approximately 54% more volatile than SPSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus 8. 4% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Samsara Inc. grew EPS 92. 9% year-over-year, compared to 17. 0% for Oracle Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOT leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -0. 6% for Samsara Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -3. 2% for IOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IOT leads at 76. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Samsara Inc. — 46. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOT: 52. 2% to $45. 82.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN?
In this comparison, ORCL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. IOT, SPSC, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOT or SPSC or ORCL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +425. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORCL: +425. 1%, IOT: +21. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOT and SPSC and ORCL and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOT (Technology) and SPSC (Technology) and ORCL (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. ORCL pays a dividend while IOT, SPSC, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.