Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IOT vs TRAK vs MBLY vs GRMN vs SPSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Auto - Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Software - Infrastructure
IOT vs TRAK vs MBLY vs GRMN vs SPSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Auto - Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $185M | $7.22B | $46.66B | $2.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.62B | $24M | $2.01B | $7.46B | $762M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $7M | $-4.11B | $1.74B | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 76.7% | 85.0% | 48.3% | 59.1% | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 30.2% | -209.5% | 26.5% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 59.3x | 27.8x | 31.4x | 25.5x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $510K | $0.00 | $165M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $29M | $1.84B | $2.28B | $151M |
IOT vs TRAK vs MBLY vs GRMN vs SPSC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 244.6 | +144.6% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 208.5 | +108.5% |
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 33.6 | -66.4% |
| Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | 100 | 274.8 | +174.8% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOT vs TRAK vs MBLY vs GRMN vs SPSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 92.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- 29.6% revenue growth vs TRAK's 10.5%
TRAK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- PEG 0.81 vs GRMN's 2.38
- PEG 0.81 vs 2.38
- 30.9% margin vs MBLY's -204.0%
Among these 5 stocks, MBLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GRMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 1.4%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs TRAK's 14.5%
- Beta 1.30, yield 1.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- 1.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRAK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SPSC is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.03 vs MBLY's 1.80
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs TRAK's 10.5% | |
| Value | PEG 0.81 vs 2.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs MBLY's -204.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs MBLY's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRAK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.4% vs SPSC's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.2% ROA vs MBLY's -35.5%, ROIC 22.0% vs -3.2% |
IOT vs TRAK vs MBLY vs GRMN vs SPSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IOT vs TRAK vs MBLY vs GRMN vs SPSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GRMN leads in 3 of 6 categories
TRAK leads 1 • SPSC leads 1 • IOT leads 0 • MBLY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 317.6x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBLY's -2.0%. On growth, IOT holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $24M | $2.0B | $7.5B | $762M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | $8M | -$3.8B | $2.2B | $162M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $7M | -$4.1B | $1.7B | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $7M | $482M | $1.5B | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.7% | +85.0% | +48.3% | +59.1% | +68.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +30.2% | -2.1% | +26.5% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +30.9% | -2.0% | +23.3% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +29.1% | +23.9% | +19.4% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +6.7% | +27.4% | +14.2% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +13.2% | -35.0% | +21.5% | -8.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SPSC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, SPSC trades at a 20% valuation discount to TRAK's 29.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRAK offers better value at 0.85x vs GRMN's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $185M | $7.2B | $46.7B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $157M | $5.4B | $44.5B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1505.50x | 29.01x | -18.48x | 28.16x | 23.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.34x | 27.82x | 31.38x | 25.45x | 12.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x | — | 2.63x | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.98x | 69.97x | 21.57x | 11.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.02x | 8.18x | 3.81x | 6.44x | 2.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.16x | 3.93x | 0.61x | 5.22x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.17x | 22.01x | 13.81x | 34.23x | 14.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GRMN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GRMN delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MBLY. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IOT's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOT scores 7/9 vs MBLY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +14.6% | -37.3% | +19.9% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +12.9% | -35.5% | +16.2% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +21.4% | -3.2% | +22.0% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +12.9% | -3.6% | +21.6% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.01x | — | 0.02x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | -$28M | -$1.8B | -$2.1B | -$141M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $29M | $1.8B | $2.3B | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $509,973 | $0 | $165M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 165.50x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GRMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $21,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,062 for MBLY. Over the past 12 months, GRMN leads with a +30.4% total return vs SPSC's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRMN at 34.4% vs MBLY's -39.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -14.1% | -21.0% | +19.9% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.2% | -52.5% | -39.9% | +30.4% | -59.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +63.0% | -77.3% | +142.8% | -62.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +110.3% | -69.4% | +79.0% | -41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +14.5% | -69.4% | +563.1% | +119.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +17.7% | -39.0% | +34.4% | -28.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRMN and SPSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPSC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBLY's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRMN currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs SPSC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 1.15x | 1.80x | 1.30x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.41 | $23.72 | $20.18 | $273.32 | $153.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.38 | $6.94 | $6.47 | $184.47 | $50.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +42.8% | +44.0% | +88.5% | +37.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 63.8 | 65.5 | 44.2 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 161K | 6.2M | 733K | 605K |
Analyst Outlook
GRMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOT as "Buy", TRAK as "Buy", MBLY as "Buy", GRMN as "Hold", SPSC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 136.3% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 11.2% for GRMN (target: $269). For income investors, GRMN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.42% vs TRAK's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.82 | $24.00 | $14.44 | $269.00 | $68.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 1 | 26 | 28 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | +1.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | — | $3.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | +1.4% | +0.5% | +5.3% |
GRMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TRAK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
IOT vs TRAK vs MBLY vs GRMN vs SPSC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 5% for ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK). SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Samsara Inc. (IOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC?
On trailing P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. at 29. 0x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ReposiTrak, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -69. 4% for Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRMN returned +563. 1% versus MBLY's -69. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Mobileye Global Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning MBLY is approximately 75% more volatile than SPSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Samsara Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus 10. 5% for ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Samsara Inc. grew EPS 92. 9% year-over-year, compared to 17. 7% for Garmin Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOT leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -20. 7% for Mobileye Global Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus -23. 2% for MBLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Samsara Inc. — 46. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 136. 3% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC?
In this comparison, GRMN (1.
4% yield), TRAK (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. IOT, MBLY, SPSC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOT or TRAK or MBLY or GRMN or SPSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +563. 1% 10Y return). Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRMN: +563. 1%, MBLY: -69. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOT and TRAK and MBLY and GRMN and SPSC?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOT (Technology) and TRAK (Technology) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and GRMN (Technology) and SPSC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock. TRAK, GRMN pay a dividend while IOT, MBLY, SPSC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.