Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IRBT vs NVCR vs HELE vs SWK vs TTI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IRBT
iRobot Corporation

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-81.6%
HELE
Helen of Troy Limited

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$595M
5Y Perf.-90.9%
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.47B
5Y Perf.-37.3%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+3354.5%

IRBT vs NVCR vs HELE vs SWK vs TTI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IRBT logoIRBT
NVCR logoNVCR
HELE logoHELE
SWK logoSWK
TTI logoTTI
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesHousehold & Personal ProductsManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$2M$1.92B$595M$12.47B$1.32B
Revenue (TTM)$547M$674M$1.79B$15.23B$630M
Net Income (TTM)$-209M$-173M$-899M$371M$7M
Gross Margin22.0%75.2%45.7%30.0%24.6%
Operating Margin-29.5%-27.2%6.0%7.8%8.4%
Forward P/E7.5x17.6x41.4x
Total Debt$227M$290M$78M$5.86B$263M
Cash & Equiv.$134M$103M$19M$280M$45M

IRBT vs NVCR vs HELE vs SWK vs TTILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IRBT
NVCR
HELE
SWK
TTI
StockMay 20Feb 26Return
iRobot Corporation (IRBT)1000.1-99.9%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10018.4-81.6%
Helen of Troy Limit… (HELE)1009.1-90.9%
Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK)10062.7-37.3%
TETRA Technologies,… (TTI)1003454.5+3354.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IRBT vs NVCR vs HELE vs SWK vs TTI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SWK leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. TETRA Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. NVCR and HELE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IRBT
iRobot Corporation
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IRBT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Growth Play

NVCR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
  • 8.3% revenue growth vs IRBT's -23.4%
Best for: growth exposure
HELE
Helen of Troy Limited
The Defensive Pick

HELE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 9.8%, current ratio 1.71x
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 41.4x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
The Income Pick

SWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
  • 2.4% margin vs HELE's -50.3%
  • 4.1% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 1.7% ROA vs IRBT's -43.3%, ROIC 5.8% vs -38.6%
Best for: income & stability
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.

  • 96.4% 10Y total return vs SWK's -1.5%
  • Beta 1.46, current ratio 2.02x
  • Beta 1.46 vs IRBT's 5.21, lower leverage
  • +246.3% vs IRBT's -97.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVCR logoNVCR8.3% revenue growth vs IRBT's -23.4%
ValueHELE logoHELELower P/E (7.5x vs 41.4x)
Quality / MarginsSWK logoSWK2.4% margin vs HELE's -50.3%
Stability / SafetyTTI logoTTIBeta 1.46 vs IRBT's 5.21, lower leverage
DividendsSWK logoSWK4.1% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TTI logoTTI+246.3% vs IRBT's -97.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SWK logoSWK1.7% ROA vs IRBT's -43.3%, ROIC 5.8% vs -38.6%

IRBT vs NVCR vs HELE vs SWK vs TTI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IRBTiRobot Corporation
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$682M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

HELEHelen of Troy Limited
FY 2025
Beauty & Wellness
52.5%$1.0B
Home & Outdoor
47.5%$906M
SWKStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
FY 2024
Industrial Segment
100.0%$2.1B
TTITETRA Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
55.7%$352M
Service
44.3%$279M

IRBT vs NVCR vs HELE vs SWK vs TTI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSWKLAGGINGHELE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NVCR and TTI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

SWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 27.8x IRBT's $547M. SWK is the more profitable business, keeping 2.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HELE's -50.3%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIRBT logoIRBTiRobot CorporationNVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$547M$674M$1.8B$15.2B$630M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$151M-$165M$107M$1.7B$90M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$209M-$173M-$899M$371M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$107M-$48M$171M$726M$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.0%+75.2%+45.7%+30.0%+24.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-29.5%-27.2%+6.0%+7.8%+8.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-38.2%-25.7%-50.3%+2.4%+1.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-19.6%-7.1%+9.6%+4.8%+0.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-24.6%+12.3%-3.3%+2.7%-0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-195.2%-100.0%-2.1%-35.0%+100.0%
Evenly matched — NVCR and TTI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — IRBT and HELE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 30.3x trailing earnings, SWK trades at a 93% valuation discount to TTI's 439.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWK's 11.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTI's 15.9x.

MetricIRBT logoIRBTiRobot CorporationNVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…
Market CapShares × price$2M$1.9B$595M$12.5B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$95M$2.1B$654M$18.0B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.01x-13.80x-0.66x30.26x439.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.53x17.64x41.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.71x15.93x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x2.92x0.33x0.82x2.09x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x5.51x0.74x1.35x4.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.48x18.12x67.62x
Evenly matched — IRBT and HELE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — HELE and SWK and TTI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

SWK delivers a 4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-113 for IRBT. HELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRBT's 3.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWK scores 6/9 vs IRBT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIRBT logoIRBTiRobot CorporationNVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-112.9%-50.8%-94.5%+4.1%+2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-43.3%-16.5%-37.8%+1.7%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-38.6%-16.4%+4.6%+5.8%+9.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-27.7%-28.9%+5.0%+7.0%+9.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935564
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.71x0.85x0.10x0.65x0.93x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$93M$187M$59M$5.6B$218M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$134M$103M$19M$280M$45M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$227M$290M$78M$5.9B$263M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.36x-96.80x-5.02x2.07x2.96x
Evenly matched — HELE and SWK and TTI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TTI five years ago would be worth $28,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for IRBT. Over the past 12 months, TTI leads with a +246.3% total return vs IRBT's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs IRBT's -88.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIRBT logoIRBTiRobot CorporationNVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.0%+28.3%+25.2%+5.9%-0.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.7%+1.1%+5.4%+41.7%+246.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-75.7%-73.2%+6.9%+229.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-91.3%-88.6%-56.2%+183.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+30.3%-74.4%-1.5%+96.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-88.8%-37.6%-35.5%+2.2%+48.9%
TTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SWK and TTI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TTI is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRBT's 5.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWK currently trades 85.9% from its 52-week high vs IRBT's 0.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIRBT logoIRBTiRobot CorporationNVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5005.21x2.20x1.65x1.83x1.46x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.10$20.06$33.76$93.37$12.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.04$9.82$13.85$58.23$2.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.9%+83.9%+76.5%+85.9%+77.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.969.878.461.063.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded01.5M627K2.0M1.8M
Evenly matched — SWK and TTI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SWK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NVCR as "Buy", HELE as "Hold", SWK as "Hold", TTI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs -14.8% for HELE (target: $22). SWK is the only dividend payer here at 4.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIRBT logoIRBTiRobot CorporationNVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.50$22.00$89.17$12.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts15113731
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises161
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.3%+0.1%0.0%
SWK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TTI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). SWK leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.

Best OverallStanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IRBT vs NVCR vs HELE vs SWK vs TTI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is the stronger pick with 8.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 4% for iRobot Corporation (IRBT). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) offers the better valuation at 30. 3x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI?

On trailing P/E, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

(SWK) is the cheapest at 30. 3x versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. at 439. 9x. On forward P/E, Helen of Troy Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI?

Over the past 5 years, TETRA Technologies, Inc.

(TTI) delivered a total return of +183. 0%, compared to -99. 9% for iRobot Corporation (IRBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTI returned +96. 4% versus IRBT's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TETRA Technologies, Inc.

(TTI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus iRobot Corporation's 5. 21β — meaning IRBT is approximately 258% more volatile than TTI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for iRobot Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is pulling ahead at 8.

3% versus -23. 4% for iRobot Corporation (IRBT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iRobot Corporation grew EPS 55. 3% year-over-year, compared to -827. 7% for Helen of Troy Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVCR leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI?

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

(SWK) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 7% net margin versus -50. 3% for Helen of Troy Limited — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTI leads at 9. 4% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) trades at 7.

5x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI?

In this comparison, SWK (4.

1% yield) pays a dividend. IRBT, NVCR, HELE, TTI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IRBT or NVCR or HELE or SWK or TTI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

(SWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 1% yield). iRobot Corporation (IRBT) carries a higher beta of 5. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWK: -1. 5%, IRBT: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IRBT and NVCR and HELE and SWK and TTI?

These companies operate in different sectors (IRBT (Consumer Cyclical) and NVCR (Healthcare) and HELE (Consumer Defensive) and SWK (Industrials) and TTI (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IRBT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SWK pays a dividend while IRBT, NVCR, HELE, TTI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IRBT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HELE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SWK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TTI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IRBT and NVCR and HELE and SWK and TTI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IRBT: -24.6% · NVCR: 12.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.